[SailfishDevel] SDK 2.0 Released
Hello Today (Mar 28th) at 14:00 UTC we have released the Sailfish SDK 2.0 to all users. The SDK has provided good value for our Sailfish users and developers, and has now matured enough for it to be released from its Beta status. Please, check out the release notes from https://together.jolla.com/question/202355/release-notes-sailfish-sdk-20/ The installers for this Early Access release of the SDK are now available at https://sailfishos.org/wiki/Application_SDK#Latest_SDK_Release. If you have an older beta release of the SDK, you should see an update notification in the Sailfish OS IDE. If you have any questions, feel free to either send an email to this mailing list: devel at lists.sailfishos.org, write it up in http://together.jolla.com and tag your issue with ‘sdk’ or send an e-mail to developer-care at jolla.com. Happy hacking, Jolla SDK Team ___ SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org
Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour validator bug again -- now it doesn't accept my i486 rpm
Hi Tamas, What's the situation regarding your package? Did you manage to get it to harbour? Have you tried again? -Ville On 25.7.2019 0.38, Tamas Miklos wrote: Hi, It seems the validator is acting up again... Now it says: "1. RPM-validation can not be done: ERROR [/home/mersdk/.cache/sdk-webapp/harbour-aida64-2.0.2-16.i486.rpm] Invalid RPM file! https://harbour.jolla.com/faq#9.1.0"; While the SFOS SDK can validate the rpm just fine. What to do in such situations? BTW, it's getting very annoying that I cannot submit updates to my app without these extra hoops. It's already taxing that you gotta wait 3-4 days for the validation, but when it fails without doing anything wrong, it makes app updates rather tiring. Thanks, Tamas ___ SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org ___ SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org
Re: [SailfishDevel] Error installing .desktop file
Hi, I think the post you found from 2013 is actually quite relevant. Your .yaml file contains a line mentioning a .desktop file, while your .pro file doesn't. Do you actually have a .desktop file? -Ville On 20.8.2019 2.23, Thomas Tanghus wrote: I am adding a subproject to my project, and since I did, the build stops with: + desktop-file-install --delete-original --dir /home/deploy/installroot/usr/share/applications '/home/deploy/installroot/usr/share/applications/*.desktop' Error on file "/home/deploy/installroot/usr/share/applications/*.desktop": No such file or directory error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.dspzIi (%install) I've been through google, duckduckgo and the list archive, and the only thing I could find, that was slightly interesting is: https://lists.sailfishos.org/pipermail/devel/2013-November/001118.html and that doesn't really apply here? The .pro and .yaml file are at https://gist.github.com/tanghus/840ce2ad46ea691f2b932e796dade0d8 /Thomas I hope this gets thru. Kmail has decided not to send emails, so I'm using Nextclouds web mail. ___ SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org ___ SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org
[SailfishDevel] Participate in our Sailfish SDK survey
Hello, We are looking for ways to improve the Sailfish SDK in future versions. In order to do that, we'd like to hear your opinions! Please take part in our short anonymous survey, and give us your valuable input. It should only take about five minutes to complete. The last day to answer the survey is Tuesday, September 3rd. Thank you in advance for your help in our product planning! Survey link: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/5CJBPDZ Kindly, Jolla SDK Team ___ SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org
Re: [SailfishDevel] [Solved] RPM validator error
On 18.9.2019 23.38, David Llewellyn-Jones wrote:
On 18/09/2019 23:27, Marko Koschak wrote:
I was trying to check the created rpm for my app ownKeepass but it
failed for a strange reason: "cpio: ./usr/bin/harbour-ownkeepass:
Cannot open: Permission denied"
After I changed one line in the .yml file the validation worked again:
- '%attr(655,-,-) %{_bindir}' -> - '%attr(755,-,-) %{_bindir}'
It seemed the executable bit was the source of the error...
Glad you solved it; I was too slow! Is this the first release? If not,
it's odd this has never caused problems in the past.
It's not that odd really. There used to be a bug in the validator.
-Ville
___
SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org
Re: [SailfishDevel] "shift" key in SDK
Hi Eli,
This sounds a lot like
https://together.jolla.com/question/220689/bug-updating-to-the-latest-sdk-307-the-numeric-pad-and-much-others-keys-dont-work-anymore-in-qtcreator/
That bug will be fixed in our next release.
-Ville
On 31.3.2020 0.43, E.S. Rosenberg wrote:
Hi all,
I'm not sure if I messed up something in my config or if this is
something else.
Inside the SDK the shift key combined with arrow keys doesn't work at all.
I can select a block of text by holding shift and clicking with the
mouse but shift+{up,down,left,right,home,end,pgup,pgdn} doesn't work.
(all the above buttons are mapped to my arrow keys on my laptop).
Anyone else also seeing this?
specs: QtCreator 4.9.1 (latests SDK - 3.2.1.x OS), Ubuntu 20.04 (pre
release)
Thanks,
Eli
___
SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org
___
SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org
Re: [SailfishDevel] ContextKit not installed?
On 1.5.2020 10.24, Thomas Tanghus wrote [C] expression for network:71 - file:///usr/share/harbour-dktv/qml/components/Network.qml:30 module "org.freedesktop.contextkit" is not installed Maybe the error message is correct, and you don't have the org.freedesktop.context plugin installed? Without seeing your project this is just guessing, but my guess is that you don't have "Requires: contextkit-declarative-qt5" line in your .spec file. BR, Ville ___ SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org
Re: [SailfishDevel] Docker build engine
On 11.5.2020 22.43, george b wrote: > sb2 -t SailfishOS-3.3.0.16-armv7hl -m sdk-install -R zypper in openssl-devel And obviously, even if that works, it will be gone on the next shutdown of the docker container. Any hints here? As long as you shutdown the container using the tools provided by the SDK (i.e. either sfdk or Qt Creator), the changes will be preserved. -Ville ___ SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org
Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour validation rules for SFOS 3.3
Hi, On 12.5.2020 12.35, Lukáš Karas wrote: ERROR [/usr/share/harbour-osmscout/map-icons/bus_stop.svg] Hardcoded path: inkscape:export-filename="/home/tim/projects/OSMScout/libosmscout/data/icons/ 14x14/standard/bus_stop.png" Another "errors" comes from application binary itself, for example: ERROR [/usr/bin/harbour-osmscout] Hardcoded path: /home/mersdk/share/ Both cases looks like false positive to me. Or there is any real reason to rejecting such binaries? You are right, these are both false positives. We will fix the validator. I will let you know (on this list) when it's done. -Ville ___ SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org
Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour validation rules for SFOS 3.3
On 12.5.2020 16.07, Lukáš Karas wrote: Great to hear that :-) I may provide patch to speedup this fix, it seems to be simple shell script: https://github.com/sailfishos/sdk-harbour-rpmvalidator/blob/master/ rpmvalidation.sh#L1066 Question is, how it should be checked? Just ELF excutables and ignore /home/mersdk/* ? PRs are always welcome :) Our current thinking is that we should still keep checking all files, but only against /home/nemo/ and /home/defaultuser/. Those two are the most likely candidates to be accidentally hardcoded in apps. -Ville ___ SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org
Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour validation rules for SFOS 3.3
On 12.5.2020 15.25, Ville Nummela wrote: On 12.5.2020 12.35, Lukáš Karas wrote: Both cases looks like false positive to me. Or there is any real reason to rejecting such binaries? You are right, these are both false positives. We will fix the validator. I will let you know (on this list) when it's done. According to our QA, the fixed validator is now in place. Thanks for the PR! -Ville ___ SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org
