syzbot reproduces BUG_ON in skb_checksum_help():
tun creates (bogus) skb with huge partial-checksummed area and
small ip packet inside. Then ip_rcv trims the skb based on size
of internal ip packet, after that csum offset points beyond of
trimmed skb. Then checksum_tg() called via netfilter hook
triggers BUG_ON:

        offset = skb_checksum_start_offset(skb);
        BUG_ON(offset >= skb_headlen(skb));

To work around the problem this patch forces pskb_trim_rcsum_slow()
to return -EINVAL in described scenario. It allows its callers to
drop such kind of packets.

Link: 
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=b419a5ca95062664fe1a60b764621eb4526e2cd0
Reported-by: syzbot+7010af67ced6105e5...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <v...@virtuozzo.com>
Acked-by: Willem de Bruijn <will...@google.com>
Link: 
https://lore.kernel.org/r/1b2494af-2c56-8ee2-7bc0-923fcad1c...@virtuozzo.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <k...@kernel.org>

Now it is in net-next:
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/54970a2fbb67
https://jira.sw.ru/browse/PSBM-123062
Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <v...@virtuozzo.com>
---
 include/linux/skbuff.h | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
index 296e734..f2c66b1 100644
--- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
+++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
@@ -3108,6 +3108,13 @@ static inline int pskb_trim_rcsum(struct sk_buff *skb, 
unsigned int len)
                return 0;
        if (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_COMPLETE)
                skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;
+       else if (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL) {
+               int hdlen = (len > skb_headlen(skb)) ? skb_headlen(skb) : len;
+               int offset = skb_checksum_start_offset(skb) + skb->csum_offset;
+
+               if (offset + sizeof(__sum16) > hdlen)
+                       return -EINVAL;
+       }
        return __pskb_trim(skb, len);
 }
 
-- 
1.8.3.1

_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to