Re: [Devel] [RFC PATCH 1/2] autofs: set compat flag on sbi when daemon uses 32bit addressation

2017-09-14 Thread Stanislav Kinsburskiy


14.09.2017 13:45, Ian Kent пишет:
> On 14/09/17 19:39, Stanislav Kinsburskiy wrote:
>>
>>
>> 14.09.2017 13:29, Ian Kent пишет:
>>> On 14/09/17 17:24, Stanislav Kinsburskiy wrote:


 14.09.2017 02:38, Ian Kent пишет:
> On 01/09/17 19:21, Stanislav Kinsburskiy wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsburskiy 
>> ---
>>  fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h  |3 +++
>>  fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c |3 +++
>>  fs/autofs4/inode.c |4 +++-
>>  3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h b/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h
>> index 4737615..3da105f 100644
>> --- a/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h
>> +++ b/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h
>> @@ -120,6 +120,9 @@ struct autofs_sb_info {
>>  struct list_head active_list;
>>  struct list_head expiring_list;
>>  struct rcu_head rcu;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
>> +unsigned is32bit:1;
>> +#endif
>>  };
>>  
>>  static inline struct autofs_sb_info *autofs4_sbi(struct super_block *sb)
>> diff --git a/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c b/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c
>> index b7c816f..467d6c4 100644
>> --- a/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c
>> +++ b/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c
>> @@ -397,6 +397,9 @@ static int autofs_dev_ioctl_setpipefd(struct file 
>> *fp,
>>  sbi->pipefd = pipefd;
>>  sbi->pipe = pipe;
>>  sbi->catatonic = 0;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
>> +sbi->is32bit = is_compat_task();
>> +#endif
>>  }
>>  out:
>>  put_pid(new_pid);
>> diff --git a/fs/autofs4/inode.c b/fs/autofs4/inode.c
>> index 09e7d68..21d3c0b 100644
>> --- a/fs/autofs4/inode.c
>> +++ b/fs/autofs4/inode.c
>> @@ -301,7 +301,9 @@ int autofs4_fill_super(struct super_block *s, void 
>> *data, int silent)
>>  } else {
>>  sbi->oz_pgrp = get_task_pid(current, PIDTYPE_PGID);
>>  }
>> -
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
>> +sbi->is32bit = is_compat_task();
>> +#endif
>>  if (autofs_type_trigger(sbi->type))
>>  __managed_dentry_set_managed(root);
>>  
>>
>
> Not sure about this.
>
> Don't you think it would be better to avoid the in code #ifdefs by doing 
> some
> checks and defines in the header file and defining what's need to just use
> is_compat_task().
>

 Yes, might be...

> Not sure 2 patches are needed for this either ..
>

 Well, I found this issue occasionally.
>>>
>>> I'm wondering what the symptoms are?
>>>
>>
>> Size of struct autofs_v5_packet is 300 bytes for x86 and 304 bytes for 
>> x86_64.
>> Which means, that 32bit task can read more than size of autofs_v5_packet on 
>> 64bit kernel.
> 
> Are you sure?
> 
> Shouldn't that be a short read on the x86 side of a 4 bytes longer
> structure on the x86_64 side.
> 
> I didn't think you could have a 64 bit client on a 32 bit kernel
> so the converse (the read past end of struct) doesn't apply.
> 

Sorry for the confusion, I had to add brackets like this:

> Which means, that 32bit task can read more than size of autofs_v5_packet (on 
> 64bit kernel).

IOW, 32bit task expects to read 300 bytes (size of struct autofs_v5_packet) 
while there are 304 bytes available on the "wire" from the 64bit kernel.


> Ian
> 
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: [Devel] [RFC PATCH 1/2] autofs: set compat flag on sbi when daemon uses 32bit addressation

2017-09-14 Thread Ian Kent
On 14/09/17 19:39, Stanislav Kinsburskiy wrote:
> 
> 
> 14.09.2017 13:29, Ian Kent пишет:
>> On 14/09/17 17:24, Stanislav Kinsburskiy wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> 14.09.2017 02:38, Ian Kent пишет:
 On 01/09/17 19:21, Stanislav Kinsburskiy wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsburskiy 
> ---
>  fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h  |3 +++
>  fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c |3 +++
>  fs/autofs4/inode.c |4 +++-
>  3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h b/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h
> index 4737615..3da105f 100644
> --- a/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h
> +++ b/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h
> @@ -120,6 +120,9 @@ struct autofs_sb_info {
>   struct list_head active_list;
>   struct list_head expiring_list;
>   struct rcu_head rcu;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> + unsigned is32bit:1;
> +#endif
>  };
>  
>  static inline struct autofs_sb_info *autofs4_sbi(struct super_block *sb)
> diff --git a/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c b/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c
> index b7c816f..467d6c4 100644
> --- a/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c
> @@ -397,6 +397,9 @@ static int autofs_dev_ioctl_setpipefd(struct file *fp,
>   sbi->pipefd = pipefd;
>   sbi->pipe = pipe;
>   sbi->catatonic = 0;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> + sbi->is32bit = is_compat_task();
> +#endif
>   }
>  out:
>   put_pid(new_pid);
> diff --git a/fs/autofs4/inode.c b/fs/autofs4/inode.c
> index 09e7d68..21d3c0b 100644
> --- a/fs/autofs4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/autofs4/inode.c
> @@ -301,7 +301,9 @@ int autofs4_fill_super(struct super_block *s, void 
> *data, int silent)
>   } else {
>   sbi->oz_pgrp = get_task_pid(current, PIDTYPE_PGID);
>   }
> -
> +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> + sbi->is32bit = is_compat_task();
> +#endif
>   if (autofs_type_trigger(sbi->type))
>   __managed_dentry_set_managed(root);
>  
>

 Not sure about this.

 Don't you think it would be better to avoid the in code #ifdefs by doing 
 some
 checks and defines in the header file and defining what's need to just use
 is_compat_task().

>>>
>>> Yes, might be...
>>>
 Not sure 2 patches are needed for this either ..

>>>
>>> Well, I found this issue occasionally.
>>
>> I'm wondering what the symptoms are?
>>
> 
> Size of struct autofs_v5_packet is 300 bytes for x86 and 304 bytes for x86_64.
> Which means, that 32bit task can read more than size of autofs_v5_packet on 
> 64bit kernel.

Are you sure?

Shouldn't that be a short read on the x86 side of a 4 bytes longer
structure on the x86_64 side.

I didn't think you could have a 64 bit client on a 32 bit kernel
so the converse (the read past end of struct) doesn't apply.

Ian
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: [Devel] [RFC PATCH 1/2] autofs: set compat flag on sbi when daemon uses 32bit addressation

2017-09-14 Thread Stanislav Kinsburskiy


14.09.2017 13:29, Ian Kent пишет:
> On 14/09/17 17:24, Stanislav Kinsburskiy wrote:
>>
>>
>> 14.09.2017 02:38, Ian Kent пишет:
>>> On 01/09/17 19:21, Stanislav Kinsburskiy wrote:
 Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsburskiy 
 ---
  fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h  |3 +++
  fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c |3 +++
  fs/autofs4/inode.c |4 +++-
  3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

 diff --git a/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h b/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h
 index 4737615..3da105f 100644
 --- a/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h
 +++ b/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h
 @@ -120,6 +120,9 @@ struct autofs_sb_info {
struct list_head active_list;
struct list_head expiring_list;
struct rcu_head rcu;
 +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
 +  unsigned is32bit:1;
 +#endif
  };
  
  static inline struct autofs_sb_info *autofs4_sbi(struct super_block *sb)
 diff --git a/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c b/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c
 index b7c816f..467d6c4 100644
 --- a/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c
 +++ b/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c
 @@ -397,6 +397,9 @@ static int autofs_dev_ioctl_setpipefd(struct file *fp,
sbi->pipefd = pipefd;
sbi->pipe = pipe;
sbi->catatonic = 0;
 +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
 +  sbi->is32bit = is_compat_task();
 +#endif
}
  out:
put_pid(new_pid);
 diff --git a/fs/autofs4/inode.c b/fs/autofs4/inode.c
 index 09e7d68..21d3c0b 100644
 --- a/fs/autofs4/inode.c
 +++ b/fs/autofs4/inode.c
 @@ -301,7 +301,9 @@ int autofs4_fill_super(struct super_block *s, void 
 *data, int silent)
} else {
sbi->oz_pgrp = get_task_pid(current, PIDTYPE_PGID);
}
 -
 +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
 +  sbi->is32bit = is_compat_task();
 +#endif
if (autofs_type_trigger(sbi->type))
__managed_dentry_set_managed(root);
  

>>>
>>> Not sure about this.
>>>
>>> Don't you think it would be better to avoid the in code #ifdefs by doing 
>>> some
>>> checks and defines in the header file and defining what's need to just use
>>> is_compat_task().
>>>
>>
>> Yes, might be...
>>
>>> Not sure 2 patches are needed for this either ..
>>>
>>
>> Well, I found this issue occasionally.
> 
> I'm wondering what the symptoms are?
> 

Size of struct autofs_v5_packet is 300 bytes for x86 and 304 bytes for x86_64.
Which means, that 32bit task can read more than size of autofs_v5_packet on 
64bit kernel.

>> And, frankly speaking, it's not clear to me, whether this issue is important 
>> at all, so I wanted to clarify this first.
>> Thanks to O_DIRECT, the only way to catch the issue is to try to read more, 
>> than expected, in compat task (that's how I found it).
> 
> Right, the O_DIRECT patch from Linus was expected to fix the structure
> alignment problem. The stuct field offsets are ok aren't they?
> 

Yes, they are ok.

>> I don't see any other flaw so far. And if so, that, probably, we shouldn't 
>> care about the issue at all.
>> What do you think?
> 
> If we are seeing hangs, incorrect struct fields or similar something
> should be done about it but if all is actually working ok then the
> O_DIRECT fix is doing it's job and further changes aren't necessary.
> 

Well, yes. O_DIRECT fix covers the issue.
Ok then.
Thanks for the clarification!

> Ian
> 
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: [Devel] [RFC PATCH 1/2] autofs: set compat flag on sbi when daemon uses 32bit addressation

2017-09-14 Thread Ian Kent
On 14/09/17 17:24, Stanislav Kinsburskiy wrote:
> 
> 
> 14.09.2017 02:38, Ian Kent пишет:
>> On 01/09/17 19:21, Stanislav Kinsburskiy wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsburskiy 
>>> ---
>>>  fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h  |3 +++
>>>  fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c |3 +++
>>>  fs/autofs4/inode.c |4 +++-
>>>  3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h b/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h
>>> index 4737615..3da105f 100644
>>> --- a/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h
>>> +++ b/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h
>>> @@ -120,6 +120,9 @@ struct autofs_sb_info {
>>> struct list_head active_list;
>>> struct list_head expiring_list;
>>> struct rcu_head rcu;
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
>>> +   unsigned is32bit:1;
>>> +#endif
>>>  };
>>>  
>>>  static inline struct autofs_sb_info *autofs4_sbi(struct super_block *sb)
>>> diff --git a/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c b/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c
>>> index b7c816f..467d6c4 100644
>>> --- a/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c
>>> +++ b/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c
>>> @@ -397,6 +397,9 @@ static int autofs_dev_ioctl_setpipefd(struct file *fp,
>>> sbi->pipefd = pipefd;
>>> sbi->pipe = pipe;
>>> sbi->catatonic = 0;
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
>>> +   sbi->is32bit = is_compat_task();
>>> +#endif
>>> }
>>>  out:
>>> put_pid(new_pid);
>>> diff --git a/fs/autofs4/inode.c b/fs/autofs4/inode.c
>>> index 09e7d68..21d3c0b 100644
>>> --- a/fs/autofs4/inode.c
>>> +++ b/fs/autofs4/inode.c
>>> @@ -301,7 +301,9 @@ int autofs4_fill_super(struct super_block *s, void 
>>> *data, int silent)
>>> } else {
>>> sbi->oz_pgrp = get_task_pid(current, PIDTYPE_PGID);
>>> }
>>> -
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
>>> +   sbi->is32bit = is_compat_task();
>>> +#endif
>>> if (autofs_type_trigger(sbi->type))
>>> __managed_dentry_set_managed(root);
>>>  
>>>
>>
>> Not sure about this.
>>
>> Don't you think it would be better to avoid the in code #ifdefs by doing some
>> checks and defines in the header file and defining what's need to just use
>> is_compat_task().
>>
> 
> Yes, might be...
> 
>> Not sure 2 patches are needed for this either ..
>>
> 
> Well, I found this issue occasionally.

I'm wondering what the symptoms are?

> And, frankly speaking, it's not clear to me, whether this issue is important 
> at all, so I wanted to clarify this first.
> Thanks to O_DIRECT, the only way to catch the issue is to try to read more, 
> than expected, in compat task (that's how I found it).

Right, the O_DIRECT patch from Linus was expected to fix the structure
alignment problem. The stuct field offsets are ok aren't they?

> I don't see any other flaw so far. And if so, that, probably, we shouldn't 
> care about the issue at all.
> What do you think?

If we are seeing hangs, incorrect struct fields or similar something
should be done about it but if all is actually working ok then the
O_DIRECT fix is doing it's job and further changes aren't necessary.

Ian
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: [Devel] [RFC PATCH 1/2] autofs: set compat flag on sbi when daemon uses 32bit addressation

2017-09-14 Thread Stanislav Kinsburskiy


14.09.2017 02:38, Ian Kent пишет:
> On 01/09/17 19:21, Stanislav Kinsburskiy wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsburskiy 
>> ---
>>  fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h  |3 +++
>>  fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c |3 +++
>>  fs/autofs4/inode.c |4 +++-
>>  3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h b/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h
>> index 4737615..3da105f 100644
>> --- a/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h
>> +++ b/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h
>> @@ -120,6 +120,9 @@ struct autofs_sb_info {
>>  struct list_head active_list;
>>  struct list_head expiring_list;
>>  struct rcu_head rcu;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
>> +unsigned is32bit:1;
>> +#endif
>>  };
>>  
>>  static inline struct autofs_sb_info *autofs4_sbi(struct super_block *sb)
>> diff --git a/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c b/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c
>> index b7c816f..467d6c4 100644
>> --- a/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c
>> +++ b/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c
>> @@ -397,6 +397,9 @@ static int autofs_dev_ioctl_setpipefd(struct file *fp,
>>  sbi->pipefd = pipefd;
>>  sbi->pipe = pipe;
>>  sbi->catatonic = 0;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
>> +sbi->is32bit = is_compat_task();
>> +#endif
>>  }
>>  out:
>>  put_pid(new_pid);
>> diff --git a/fs/autofs4/inode.c b/fs/autofs4/inode.c
>> index 09e7d68..21d3c0b 100644
>> --- a/fs/autofs4/inode.c
>> +++ b/fs/autofs4/inode.c
>> @@ -301,7 +301,9 @@ int autofs4_fill_super(struct super_block *s, void 
>> *data, int silent)
>>  } else {
>>  sbi->oz_pgrp = get_task_pid(current, PIDTYPE_PGID);
>>  }
>> -
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
>> +sbi->is32bit = is_compat_task();
>> +#endif
>>  if (autofs_type_trigger(sbi->type))
>>  __managed_dentry_set_managed(root);
>>  
>>
> 
> Not sure about this.
> 
> Don't you think it would be better to avoid the in code #ifdefs by doing some
> checks and defines in the header file and defining what's need to just use
> is_compat_task().
> 

Yes, might be...

> Not sure 2 patches are needed for this either ..
> 

Well, I found this issue occasionally.
And, frankly speaking, it's not clear to me, whether this issue is important at 
all, so I wanted to clarify this first.
Thanks to O_DIRECT, the only way to catch the issue is to try to read more, 
than expected, in compat task (that's how I found it).
I don't see any other flaw so far. And if so, that, probably, we shouldn't care 
about the issue at all.
What do you think?


> Ian
> 


 
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: [Devel] [RFC PATCH 1/2] autofs: set compat flag on sbi when daemon uses 32bit addressation

2017-09-13 Thread Ian Kent
On 01/09/17 19:21, Stanislav Kinsburskiy wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsburskiy 
> ---
>  fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h  |3 +++
>  fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c |3 +++
>  fs/autofs4/inode.c |4 +++-
>  3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h b/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h
> index 4737615..3da105f 100644
> --- a/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h
> +++ b/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h
> @@ -120,6 +120,9 @@ struct autofs_sb_info {
>   struct list_head active_list;
>   struct list_head expiring_list;
>   struct rcu_head rcu;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> + unsigned is32bit:1;
> +#endif
>  };
>  
>  static inline struct autofs_sb_info *autofs4_sbi(struct super_block *sb)
> diff --git a/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c b/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c
> index b7c816f..467d6c4 100644
> --- a/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c
> @@ -397,6 +397,9 @@ static int autofs_dev_ioctl_setpipefd(struct file *fp,
>   sbi->pipefd = pipefd;
>   sbi->pipe = pipe;
>   sbi->catatonic = 0;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> + sbi->is32bit = is_compat_task();
> +#endif
>   }
>  out:
>   put_pid(new_pid);
> diff --git a/fs/autofs4/inode.c b/fs/autofs4/inode.c
> index 09e7d68..21d3c0b 100644
> --- a/fs/autofs4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/autofs4/inode.c
> @@ -301,7 +301,9 @@ int autofs4_fill_super(struct super_block *s, void *data, 
> int silent)
>   } else {
>   sbi->oz_pgrp = get_task_pid(current, PIDTYPE_PGID);
>   }
> -
> +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> + sbi->is32bit = is_compat_task();
> +#endif
>   if (autofs_type_trigger(sbi->type))
>   __managed_dentry_set_managed(root);
>  
> 

Not sure about this.

Don't you think it would be better to avoid the in code #ifdefs by doing some
checks and defines in the header file and defining what's need to just use
is_compat_task().

Not sure 2 patches are needed for this either ..

Ian
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Devel] [RFC PATCH 1/2] autofs: set compat flag on sbi when daemon uses 32bit addressation

2017-09-01 Thread Stanislav Kinsburskiy
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsburskiy 
---
 fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h  |3 +++
 fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c |3 +++
 fs/autofs4/inode.c |4 +++-
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h b/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h
index 4737615..3da105f 100644
--- a/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h
+++ b/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h
@@ -120,6 +120,9 @@ struct autofs_sb_info {
struct list_head active_list;
struct list_head expiring_list;
struct rcu_head rcu;
+#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
+   unsigned is32bit:1;
+#endif
 };
 
 static inline struct autofs_sb_info *autofs4_sbi(struct super_block *sb)
diff --git a/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c b/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c
index b7c816f..467d6c4 100644
--- a/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c
@@ -397,6 +397,9 @@ static int autofs_dev_ioctl_setpipefd(struct file *fp,
sbi->pipefd = pipefd;
sbi->pipe = pipe;
sbi->catatonic = 0;
+#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
+   sbi->is32bit = is_compat_task();
+#endif
}
 out:
put_pid(new_pid);
diff --git a/fs/autofs4/inode.c b/fs/autofs4/inode.c
index 09e7d68..21d3c0b 100644
--- a/fs/autofs4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/autofs4/inode.c
@@ -301,7 +301,9 @@ int autofs4_fill_super(struct super_block *s, void *data, 
int silent)
} else {
sbi->oz_pgrp = get_task_pid(current, PIDTYPE_PGID);
}
-
+#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
+   sbi->is32bit = is_compat_task();
+#endif
if (autofs_type_trigger(sbi->type))
__managed_dentry_set_managed(root);
 

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Devel] [RFC PATCH 1/2] autofs: set compat flag on sbi when daemon uses 32bit addressation

2017-08-31 Thread Stanislav Kinsburskiy
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsburskiy 
---
 fs/autofs4/inode.c |   16 
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/autofs4/inode.c b/fs/autofs4/inode.c
index b23cf2a..989ac38 100644
--- a/fs/autofs4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/autofs4/inode.c
@@ -217,6 +217,7 @@ int autofs4_fill_super(struct super_block *s, void *data, 
int silent)
int pgrp;
bool pgrp_set = false;
int ret = -EINVAL;
+   struct task_struct *tsk;
 
sbi = kzalloc(sizeof(*sbi), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!sbi)
@@ -281,10 +282,25 @@ int autofs4_fill_super(struct super_block *s, void *data, 
int silent)
pgrp);
goto fail_dput;
}
+   tsk = get_pid_task(sbi->oz_pgrp, PIDTYPE_PGID);
+   if (!tsk) {
+   pr_warn("autofs: could not find process group leader 
%d\n",
+   pgrp);
+   goto fail_put_pid;
+   }
} else {
sbi->oz_pgrp = get_task_pid(current, PIDTYPE_PGID);
+   get_task_struct(current);
+   tsk = current;
}
 
+   if (test_tsk_thread_flag(tsk, TIF_ADDR32))
+   sbi->is32bit = 1;
+   else
+   sbi->is32bit = 0;
+
+   put_task_struct(tsk);
+
if (autofs_type_trigger(sbi->type))
__managed_dentry_set_managed(root);
 

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel