Re: [ovirt-devel] oVirt 3.5 Test Day 1 Results - user defined Windows Sysprep file

2014-07-10 Thread Shahar Havivi
On 09.07.14 12:44, Vojtech Szocs wrote:
 Hi,
 
 today I played with this feature [1]:
 
 - Win7 VM without custom Sysprep override in VM dialog
 - Win7 VM with custom Sysprep override in VM dialog
 - REST API call to check custom Sysprep override for VM
 
 [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080002
 
 It worked for me without any problems.
 
 Vojtech
Thank you very much for you help,
Shahar.
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[ovirt-devel] oVirt 3.5 Test Day 1 Results

2014-07-08 Thread Adam Litke

I tested:

* [RFE] Prevent host fencing while kdumping
 -  http://www.ovirt.org/Fence_kdump
* hosted-engine-setup

Results:
Bug 1115123 -- hosted-engine-setup fails with ioprocess oop_impl enabled

Adding a host with Detect kdump flow set to on and without crashkernel
command line parameter results in a warning in the log as expected.

I ran out of time before I was able to configure crash dump detection
for my host VMs correctly.  Looking forward to more thorough testing
on the next test day.

--
Adam Litke
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: [ovirt-devel] oVirt 3.5 test day 1 results

2014-07-02 Thread Michal Skrivanek
nice test, Nir.
would you mind adding the important bugs to 3.5 tracker [1]?
I'd agree that not being able to upgrade without removal of all hosts and vms 
is a blocker for a release:-)
others seem to be quite important too

Thanks,
michal

[1] http://bugzilla.redhat.com/1073943

On Jul 1, 2014, at 20:31 , Nir Soffer nsof...@redhat.com wrote:

 Hi all,
 
 I tested today [RFE] replace XML-RPC communication (engine-vdsm) with 
 json-rpc based on bidirectional transport
 
 First I upgraded ovirt-3.4 stable engine to ovirt-3.5 - ok
 Then I upgraded 4 hosts to latest vdsm - ok
 
 I upgraded 2 data centers to cluster version 3.5:
 - 2 Fedora 19 hosts with 30 ISCSI storage domains - ok
 - 2 RHEL 6.5 hosts with 45 NFS storage domains - failed
  I had to remove the hosts and the virtual machines to complete
  the upgrade [1]
 
 Then I removed the hosts and added them back (to configure jsonrpc), and
 setup one host using jsonrpc and the other using xmlrpc - ok
 
 After moving the hosts to maintenance mode and starting them back, I found
 that the host using jsonrpc was stuck in Unassigned state [2],[3].
 
 The errors in the vdsm log were not clear enough. After I improving this [4],
 I could fix it in one line patch [5].
 
 Finally when I had a working system, I run some sanity tests:
 - start/stop vm - ok
 - create vm from template - ok
 - migrate vms between two hosts concurrenly (one host use xmlrpc, one using 
 json) - ok
 
 Then I tried to test create template from vm, but I had low disk space
 on that storage domain. So I tried to extend the domain which would be
 useful test as well.
 
 But turns out that you cannot create or edit a block domain when using 
 jsonrpc [6]
 
 Looking at the logs, I found also that shutting down protocol detector fails 
 [7]
 
 Summary:
 
 - upgrade is broken in some cases - critical
 - jsonrpc is not ready yet
 - jsonrpc needs lot of additional testing - for next test day I suggest one 
 tester
  from each team (virt, storage, networking, sla?) to test jsonrpc with 
 relevant
  flows.
 
 [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1114994
Cannot edit cluster after upgrade from version 3.4 to 3.5 because cpu type 
 (Intel Haswell) does not match
 
 [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1115033
StoragePool_disconnect: disconnect() takes exactly 4 arguments
 
 [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1115044
Host stuck in Unassinged state when using jsonrpc and disconnection from 
 pool failed
 
 [4] http://gerrit.ovirt.org/29457 
bridge: Show more info when method call fail
 
 [5] http://gerrit.ovirt.org/29465
api: Make remove optional
 
 [6] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115152
Cannot edit or create block storage doamin when using jsonrpc
 
 [7] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1115104
Shuting down protocol detector fails
 
 Nir
 ___
 Devel mailing list
 Devel@ovirt.org
 http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[ovirt-devel] oVirt 3.5 Test Day 1 Results

2014-07-01 Thread Martin Perina
Hi,

I tested these features:

  1073453 - OVIRT35 - [RFE] add Debian 7 to the list of operating systems when 
creating a new vm
Info: Debian 7 is listed in OS in new VM dialog
Result: success

  1047624 - OVIRT35 - [RFE] support BIOS boot device menu
Info: Boot menu has to be enabled in Edit VM dialog Boot options tab Enable 
boot menu. Once enabled,
  user can press F12 and select boot device in the same way as in 
standard BIOS
Result: success


During test I found these issues:

  1) Engine installation problem on Centos 6.5
  Package 
ovirt-engine-userportal-3.5.0-0.0.master.20140629172257.git0b16ed7.el6.noarch.rpm
 is not signed
 After disabling GPG signature check in /etc/yum.repos.d/ovirt-3.5.repo, 
installation continues fine.

  2) Engine installation problem on Centos 6.5
 Engine indirectly depends on batik packaged, but xmlgraphics-batik is 
installed instead of it.
 I created a bug [1]

  3) Packages ioprocess and python-ioprocess are not available in oVirt 
repository for 3.5 beta (even they are
 available in master-snapshot-static repository).
 Created a ticket for infra https://fedorahosted.org/ovirt/ticket/205
 


Martin

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1114921
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[ovirt-devel] oVirt 3.5 test day 1 results

2014-07-01 Thread Douglas Schilling Landgraf

Hi,

This time I have tested the below RFE:

[RFE] Change the Slot field to Service Profile when cisco_ucs is 
selected as the fencing type.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090803

Test Data
===
Running oVirt 3.5 with Power Management enabled in hosts when selecting 
Type cisco_ucs the Slot field get replaced by Service Profile as RFE 
requested. The same test under 3.4 the field is not replaced.

I would say this RFE is 100% accomplished.



--
Cheers
Douglas
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel