Re: [ovirt-devel] noarch vdsm.rpm
I am pretty sure you have to tell rpm that it is supposed to be noarch package: BuildArch: noarch I do not see that anywhere in that patch. -- Martin Sivák msi...@redhat.com Red Hat Czech RHEV-M SLA / Brno, CZ - Original Message - I'd like to make Vdsm a pure noarc package, by shedding the remaining safelease binary to a helper package and posted http://gerrit.ovirt.org/30678 on these lines. However, this patch is not enough - when built on an x86_64 host, rpm still recognizes vdsm.rpm and vdsm-python.rpm as x86_64 instead of noarch. Dropping all mentions of x86_64 from the spec did not help, either. Is there an RPM wizard around who can tell me why is this auto-detection happening, and how can it be avoided? Dan. ___ Devel mailing list Devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ovirt-devel] noarch vdsm.rpm
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 07:37:45AM -0400, Martin Sivak wrote: I am pretty sure you have to tell rpm that it is supposed to be noarch package: BuildArch: noarch I do not see that anywhere in that patch. Thanks, it did the trick. Now the only problem is the x86_64-only dmidecode requirement. Yaniv, can it be changed to a soft requirement? ___ Devel mailing list Devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ovirt-devel] noarch vdsm.rpm
On 07/24/2014 03:42 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 07:37:45AM -0400, Martin Sivak wrote: I am pretty sure you have to tell rpm that it is supposed to be noarch package: BuildArch: noarch I do not see that anywhere in that patch. Thanks, it did the trick. Now the only problem is the x86_64-only dmidecode requirement. Yaniv, can it be changed to a soft requirement? s yes, this is actually not needed as build requirement , if that's what you mean http://gerrit.ovirt.org/30682 -- Yaniv Bronhaim. ___ Devel mailing list Devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel