Re: [riot-devel] openthread and riot - license issues?

[MATTIA ANTONINI]

Hi all,
I have the same problem (I'm preparing the IoTivity Pkg) and I asked to
Emmanuel how can I solve it. He answered:

- any code destined (PRed) to be included in RIOT master should be LGPLv2.1
- any code that is not destined to go into RIOT master follows other
applicable license policy

The OpenThread RIOT Pkg is composed by Makefiles and some code released
under  LGPLv2.1 license. The OT code is downloaded during the compilation
phase. I guess there is not any license issue because the PRed code is
compliant with the RIOT license.

Have a nice day,

Mattia

2016-10-22 22:49 GMT+02:00 Alexander Aring :

>
> Hi,
>
> On 10/22/2016 05:11 PM, Martine Lenders wrote:
> > Hi Alex,
> > we include openthread's source code as a package so as far as we are
> > concerned (but we are not lawyers) there is no licensing issue. If you
> know
> > anything different, please let us know!
> >
>
> I am also not a lawyer. I think I got confused because
>
> "WHICH LICENSES MAY NOT BE INCLUDED WITHIN APACHE PRODUCTS?"
>
> from [0]. But RIOT is not an "APACHE PRODUCT"... , :-)
>
> but then I still don't get something - there was a discussion about
> jerryscript in RIOT at riot-summit. Jerryscript is also apache license
> and the discussion was about license issues between jerryscript and RIOT.
>
> I don't see a difference here now. Maybe somebody knows more? :-/
>
> - Alex
>
> [0] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
> ___
> devel mailing list
> devel@riot-os.org
> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [riot-devel] Problem with UDP and SAMR21-XPRO

[MATTIA ANTONINI]

Done! I hope I've done well, I followed your instructions.

Cheers,
Mattia

2016-07-04 15:49 GMT+02:00 Martine Lenders <m...@martine-lenders.eu>:

> Hi,
> make a fork of master on GitHub [1] (hit the fork button in the upper
> right corner) and clone the fork to your local machine:
>
> $ git clone g...@github.com:/RIOT.git
>
> or, if you already cloned the RIOT-OS repository just add it as another
> remote
>
> $ git remote add mine g...@github.com:/RIOT.git
> $ git fetch mine
>
> It's important to use the SSH-URL here so you have push rights to that
> remote (I think instead of SSH you can actually also use the HTTP-URL
> for push rights, but I'm not sure and never tried that).
>
> Create a new branch from master
>
> $ git checkout -b gnrc_ipv6/pr/udp-fix master
>
> Apply your changes and commit them
>
> $ git commit -am "gnrc_ipv6: fix UDP issue"
>
> Maybe describe the fix a little bit better but keep it under 72
> characters in the subject line
>
> Push to your repo:
>
> $ git push -u mine gnrc_ipv6/pr/udp-fix
>
> Ideally there is a new button on GitHub [1] now, that gives you the
> ability to create a Pull Request to the main repository for your
> branch, but if not (might happen if your master branch was a little
> older). You have two ways of fixing this. The harder, but cleaner
> approach (which you might need to do anyways so better do it), would
> be to rebase:
>
> $ git fetch origin
> $ git rebase origin/master
> # fix merge conflicts that might occure using if you are on ubuntu:
> installing Meld (`sudo apt-get install meld`) provides a nice GUI to
> resolve them
> $ git mergetool # ... resolve merge-conflict (1)
> $ git rebase --continue # ... resolve merge-conflict (2)
> # you might have to repeat that step several times depending on the
> number of commits that end up in your branch
> $ git push -f # force-push to your branch
>
> The easier way is just to follow this piece of instruction [2]. But if
> there is a merge conflict the reviewer might ask you to rebase anyway.
>
> [1] https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT
> [2] https://help.github.com/articles/creating-a-pull-request/
>
> 2016-07-04 15:25 GMT+02:00 MATTIA ANTONINI <
> mattia.antoni...@studenti.unipr.it>:
> > Hi Martine,
> > I think I've fixed this problem. I've tested my scenario with
> gnr_networking
> > and microcoap_server and all is working :)
> > Which is the procedure to push the code? I've never done it before :)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Mattia
> >
> >
> > 2016-07-04 10:56 GMT+02:00 Martine Lenders <m...@martine-lenders.eu>:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >> I finally will have some time to look into it, but it would also be
> >> great if there would be an issue for that on GitHub and maybe to
> >> involve Takuo, since it is their PR that seem to have broken it.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Martine
> >>
> >> 2016-06-24 12:01 GMT+02:00 Martine Lenders <m...@martine-lenders.eu>:
> >> > Hi Mattia, hi Alex,
> >> > due to having my head mostly on the defense of my master thesis I have
> >> > next monday I wasn't able to look into this as promised. :(
> >> >
> >> > Thanks however Mattia for the in-depth analysis and the bisect! As
> >> > soon as I find some head space I will look into it, too.
> >> >
> >> > Cheers,
> >> > Martine
> >> >
> >> > 2016-06-23 23:56 GMT+02:00 MATTIA ANTONINI
> >> > <mattia.antoni...@studenti.unipr.it>:
> >> >> Hi all!
> >> >> I found the problem in the commit 0de34c9 [1]. Can anyone check this
> >> >> commit?
> >> >> I've also tried  the commit before ( f7bd237) and everything works.
> >> >>
> >> >> Cheers,
> >> >>
> >> >> Mattia
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> [1]
> >> >>
> >> >>
> https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/commit/0de34c91c618829a845feef753b3ea32683365ed
> >> >>
> >> >> 2016-06-22 15:14 GMT+02:00 Alexandre Abadie
> >> >> <alexandre.aba...@inria.fr>:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Hi,
> >> >>>
> >> >>> > though I do not have the same setup ready for testing, I _cannot_
> >> >>> > confirm any
> >> >>> > problems with UDP on latest RIOT master branch.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > I just tested UDP on a SAMR21-XPRO

Re: [riot-devel] Problem with UDP and SAMR21-XPRO

[MATTIA ANTONINI]

Hi Martine,
I think I've fixed this problem. I've tested my scenario with
gnr_networking and microcoap_server and all is working :)
Which is the procedure to push the code? I've never done it before :)

Cheers,
Mattia

2016-07-04 10:56 GMT+02:00 Martine Lenders <m...@martine-lenders.eu>:

> Hi,
> I finally will have some time to look into it, but it would also be
> great if there would be an issue for that on GitHub and maybe to
> involve Takuo, since it is their PR that seem to have broken it.
>
> Cheers,
> Martine
>
> 2016-06-24 12:01 GMT+02:00 Martine Lenders <m...@martine-lenders.eu>:
> > Hi Mattia, hi Alex,
> > due to having my head mostly on the defense of my master thesis I have
> > next monday I wasn't able to look into this as promised. :(
> >
> > Thanks however Mattia for the in-depth analysis and the bisect! As
> > soon as I find some head space I will look into it, too.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Martine
> >
> > 2016-06-23 23:56 GMT+02:00 MATTIA ANTONINI <
> mattia.antoni...@studenti.unipr.it>:
> >> Hi all!
> >> I found the problem in the commit 0de34c9 [1]. Can anyone check this
> commit?
> >> I've also tried  the commit before ( f7bd237) and everything works.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Mattia
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> [1]
> >>
> https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/commit/0de34c91c618829a845feef753b3ea32683365ed
> >>
> >> 2016-06-22 15:14 GMT+02:00 Alexandre Abadie <alexandre.aba...@inria.fr
> >:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> > though I do not have the same setup ready for testing, I _cannot_
> >>> > confirm any
> >>> > problems with UDP on latest RIOT master branch.
> >>> >
> >>> > I just tested UDP on a SAMR21-XPRO running gnrc_networking example
> and
> >>> > successfully send and received UDP data from and to a RasPi with
> >>> > Openlabs
> >>> > transceiver running netcat on latest Raspbian-Linux.
> >>> >
> >>> > Could you clarify which RIOT branch/commit you use?
> >>>
> >>> Latest master. From what you say, the problem comes from the RIOT BR.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>>
> >>> Alex
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> >
> >>> > Best,
> >>> >   Sebastian
> >>> >
> >>> > > Am 21.06.2016 um 21:42 schrieb Alexandre Abadie
> >>> > > <alexandre.aba...@inria.fr>:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Hi Mattia,
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Thanks for reporting this issue.
> >>> > >
> >>> > >> I've discovered a possible bug in RIOT. I'm working with 2
> >>> > >> samr21-xpro: on
> >>> > >> the first is running gnrc_border_router (I'll call it A) and on
> the
> >>> > >> other
> >>> > >> (I'll call it B) is running gnrc_networking. I've well configured
> my
> >>> > >> scenario infact I can ping both my nodes from linux shell. But,
> when
> >>> > >> I
> >>> > >> send
> >>> > >> a UDP packet to B (with nc) it is forwarded correctly on tap
> >>> > >> interface (I
> >>> > >> seen it on wireshark) but it arrives corrupted (wrong checksum)
> to B
> >>> > >> and
> >>> > >> it
> >>> > >> is dropped by UDP thread. I've enabled packet dump and the packet
> >>> > >> arrives
> >>> > >> with different packet lengths in ipv6 and udp headers (fixed to
> 8, it
> >>> > >> is
> >>> > >> the UDP header length) and the udp payload is removed.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > I have the exact same problem although I didn't track it as deep as
> >>> > > you
> >>> > > did.
> >>> > >
> >>> > >> How can I fix this problem?
> >>> > >
> >>> > > A regression was introduced 2 or 3 weeks ago in master and you
> could
> >>> > > first
> >>> > > "git bisect" to try to identify the incriminated commit.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Thanks,
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Alex
> >>> > > ___
> >>> > > devel mailing list
> >>> > > devel@riot-os.org
> >>> > > https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> >>> >
> >>> > ___
> >>> > devel mailing list
> >>> > devel@riot-os.org
> >>> > https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> >>> >
> >>> ___
> >>> devel mailing list
> >>> devel@riot-os.org
> >>> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ___
> >> devel mailing list
> >> devel@riot-os.org
> >> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> >>
> ___
> devel mailing list
> devel@riot-os.org
> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[riot-devel] RIOT Vs Iotivity, AllJoyn, Thread

[MATTIA ANTONINI]

Dear  RIOTers ,
I'm a MSc student and I'm working on RIOT for my thesis. I ask you what is
the future of RIOT in term of high level protocol like IoTivity, AllJoyn
and Thread. Is anyone writing a porting of these protocols or is anything
planned? or, which is the most suitable high level protocol for RIOT? I
found a thread in this mailing list about this topic, but it is quite old
and I think something is changed.
I hope I explained myself well.
Regards,
Mattia Antonini
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel