Re: [PATCH] RTEMS thread model configuration
Ping^2.
On 02/05/14 10:46, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Ping.
On 2014-04-18 12:11, Sebastian Huber wrote:
From: Sebastian Huber sebastian-hu...@web.de
The command line to build a GCC for RTEMS contained virtually always a
'--enable-threads'. This patch helps to avoid this extra configuration
command line parameter and makes the GCC build a bit more user friendly
for RTEMS.
This patch should be applied to GCC 4.9 branch and master.
2014-04-18 Sebastian Huber sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
* config.gcc (*-*-rtems*): Default to 'rtems' thread model.
Enable selection of 'posix' or no thread model.
---
gcc/config.gcc | 8 +++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config.gcc b/gcc/config.gcc
index 3c55c88..93d5994 100644
--- a/gcc/config.gcc
+++ b/gcc/config.gcc
@@ -791,7 +791,13 @@ case ${target} in
;;
*-*-rtems*)
case ${enable_threads} in
-yes) thread_file='rtems' ;;
+ | yes | rtems) thread_file='rtems' ;;
+posix) thread_file='posix' ;;
+no) ;;
+*)
+ echo 'Unknown thread configuration for RTEMS'
+ exit 1
+ ;;
esac
tmake_file=${tmake_file} t-rtems
extra_options=${extra_options} rtems.opt
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [PATCH] RTEMS thread model configuration
Thanks for the ping.
I updated the date on the ChangeLog and committed this.
--joel
On 9/17/2014 8:26 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Ping^2.
On 02/05/14 10:46, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Ping.
On 2014-04-18 12:11, Sebastian Huber wrote:
From: Sebastian Huber sebastian-hu...@web.de
The command line to build a GCC for RTEMS contained virtually always a
'--enable-threads'. This patch helps to avoid this extra configuration
command line parameter and makes the GCC build a bit more user friendly
for RTEMS.
This patch should be applied to GCC 4.9 branch and master.
2014-04-18 Sebastian Huber sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
* config.gcc (*-*-rtems*): Default to 'rtems' thread model.
Enable selection of 'posix' or no thread model.
---
gcc/config.gcc | 8 +++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config.gcc b/gcc/config.gcc
index 3c55c88..93d5994 100644
--- a/gcc/config.gcc
+++ b/gcc/config.gcc
@@ -791,7 +791,13 @@ case ${target} in
;;
*-*-rtems*)
case ${enable_threads} in
-yes) thread_file='rtems' ;;
+ | yes | rtems) thread_file='rtems' ;;
+posix) thread_file='posix' ;;
+no) ;;
+*)
+ echo 'Unknown thread configuration for RTEMS'
+ exit 1
+ ;;
esac
tmake_file=${tmake_file} t-rtems
extra_options=${extra_options} rtems.opt
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research Development
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.comOn-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available(256) 722-9985
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [PATCH] RTEMS thread model configuration
On 26/07/2014 9:01 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
The command line to build a GCC for RTEMS contained virtually always a
'--enable-threads'. This patch helps to avoid this extra configuration
command line parameter and makes the GCC build a bit more user friendly
for RTEMS.
+1
This patch should be applied to GCC 4.9 branch and master.
2014-04-18 Sebastian Huber sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
* config.gcc (*-*-rtems*): Default to 'rtems' thread model.
Enable selection of 'posix' or no thread model.
---
gcc/config.gcc | 8 +++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config.gcc b/gcc/config.gcc
index 9b6a5f3..6eefa53 100644
--- a/gcc/config.gcc
+++ b/gcc/config.gcc
@@ -791,7 +791,13 @@ case ${target} in
;;
*-*-rtems*)
case ${enable_threads} in
-yes) thread_file='rtems' ;;
+ | yes | rtems) thread_file='rtems' ;;
+posix) thread_file='posix' ;;
Hmm the posix model is a little tricky. It would be good if this was the
standard for RTEMS however we know there are issues and leaving it
available lets us test when the issues start to get worked on yet having
this available also implies it is available for use. I suppose it is ok
and anyone building the tools knows what they are doing or is using
something like the RSB.
Chris
+no) ;;
+*)
+ echo 'Unknown thread configuration for RTEMS'
+ exit 1
+ ;;
esac
tmake_file=${tmake_file} t-rtems
extra_options=${extra_options} rtems.opt
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
