Yes. It was intended.
On Wed, 17 Mar 2021, 2:36 am Chris Johns, wrote:
> On 16/3/21 7:15 pm, Ida Delphine wrote:
> > Changed command from ../source-builder/sb-set-builder
> --source-only-download 5/rtems-sparc to ../source-builder/sb-set-builder
> --source-only-download 6/rtems-sparc.
> > Updated sample output as well
>
> The commit message line is too long. Please break it up.
>
> > ---
> > user/start/sources.rst | 10 +-
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/user/start/sources.rst b/user/start/sources.rst
> > index 8c40aa0..f4cb8ae 100644
> > --- a/user/start/sources.rst
> > +++ b/user/start/sources.rst
> > @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Obtain the Sources
> > ==
> >
> > You have considered and chosen a suitable installation prefix in the
> previous
> > -section. We have chosen :file:`$HOME/quick-start/rtems/5` as the
> installation
> > +section. We have chosen :file:`$HOME/quick-start/rtems/6` as the
> installation
> > prefix. We will show how to use a released version of RTEMS and then as
> an
> > alternative we will show you using the :ref:`RSB Git repository
> > `. Consider using a Git clone if you wish to make
> > @@ -114,17 +114,17 @@ the sources to build the ERC 32 BSP before
> building run the following commands:
> > .. code-block:: none
> >
> > cd $HOME/quick-start/src/rsb/rtems
> > -../source-builder/sb-set-builder --source-only-download
> 5/rtems-sparc
> > +../source-builder/sb-set-builder --source-only-download
> 6/rtems-sparc
> >
> > This command should output something like this (omitted lines are
> denoted by
> > ``...``):
> >
> > .. code-block:: none
> >
> > -RTEMS Source Builder - Set Builder, 5.1.0
> > -Build Set: 5/rtems-sparc
> > +RTEMS Source Builder - Set Builder, 6
> > +Build Set: 6/rtems-sparc
> > ...
> > -download:
> https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/releases/5/5.1.0/5.1.0/sources/gcc-7.5.0.tar.xz
> -> sources/gcc-7.5.0.tar.xz
> > +download:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/gmp-6.1.0.tar.bz2 ->
> sources/gmp-6.1.0.tar.bz2
>
> Probability a good idea to move away from using a released version in the
> part.
> Is that intended?
>
> Chris
>
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
