Re: Which I2c framework to prefer for BSP

2016-07-13 Thread Sebastian Huber

Hello,

please use the cpukit/dev/i2c framework. For example bus drivers see

https://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/xilinx-zynq/i2c/cadence-i2c.c
https://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/atsam/i2c/atsam_i2c_bus.c

On 13/07/16 19:21, punit vara wrote:

Hi all !

I have just started reading about I2C from TRM to achieve my next
deliverable . As Gedare told there are two I2C frame work in RTEMS.
Which one I should use during implementation cpukit/libi2c or
cpukit/dev/i2c ? I would like to confirm before start coding.

Regards,
Punit Vara
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH

Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail  : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.

Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.

___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Which I2c framework to prefer for BSP

2016-07-13 Thread punit vara
Hi all !

I have just started reading about I2C from TRM to achieve my next
deliverable . As Gedare told there are two I2C frame work in RTEMS.
Which one I should use during implementation cpukit/libi2c or
cpukit/dev/i2c ? I would like to confirm before start coding.

Regards,
Punit Vara
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel