Re: ATI Imageon 100

2003-07-30 Thread The Rasterman
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 17:49:21 -0700 "Kendall Bennett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(Bbabbled:
(B
(B> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(B> 
(B> > > TrollTech uses the Linux framebuffer and does not have acceleration
(B> > > support except for a small number of sample drivers (Mach64, Matrox and
(B> > > Voodoo3). Hence if Qt works on that device, it just uses a dumb
(B> > > framebuffer and whatever is exported by the kernel via the framebuffer
(B> > > interface.
(B> > 
(B> > are you sure they haven't written a custom acceleration support
(B> > module for the imageon just for sharp? 
(B> 
(B> Yes, I am sure. We are a development partner of Trolltech's ;-)
(B
(BAaah then I bow to your superior knowledge of the situation :)
(B
(B
(B-- 
(B--- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" 
(BThe Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)[EMAIL PROTECTED]
$B7'<*(B - $Bhttp://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: ATI Imageon 100

2003-07-30 Thread Kendall Bennett
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > TrollTech uses the Linux framebuffer and does not have acceleration
> > support except for a small number of sample drivers (Mach64, Matrox and
> > Voodoo3). Hence if Qt works on that device, it just uses a dumb
> > framebuffer and whatever is exported by the kernel via the framebuffer
> > interface.
> 
> are you sure they haven't written a custom acceleration support
> module for the imageon just for sharp? 

Yes, I am sure. We are a development partner of Trolltech's ;-)

Regards,

---
Kendall Bennett
Chief Executive Officer
SciTech Software, Inc.
Phone: (530) 894 8400
http://www.scitechsoft.com

~ SciTech SNAP - The future of device driver technology! ~

___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: ATI Imageon 100

2003-07-30 Thread The Rasterman
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:08:40 -0700 "Kendall Bennett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(Bbabbled:
(B
(B> Hannes Reinecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(B> 
(B> > > Also, I think this is a different movie. The embbeded market is
(B> > > different to the desktop one.  
(B> > 
(B> > Hmm, have you tried asking trolltech?
(B> > After all, they did do the QT GUI for the Zaurus and presumably would need
(B> > to know how to access the framebuffer, this being embedded. So one would
(B> > assume that _some_ docs must have been available ...
(B> 
(B> TrollTech uses the Linux framebuffer and does not have acceleration 
(B> support except for a small number of sample drivers (Mach64, Matrox and 
(B> Voodoo3). Hence if Qt works on that device, it just uses a dumb 
(B> framebuffer and whatever is exported by the kernel via the framebuffer 
(B> interface.
(B
(Bare you sure they haven't written a custom acceleration support module for the
(Bimageon just for sharp? they do own the copyright to their code.. so they never
(Bhave to release it if they don't want to... (this kind of thing is done quite
(Boften in the embedded market - there are custom add-ons and drivers for "a
(B"normal" software package, just to make it work with the vendors esoteric
(Bhardware)
(B
(Bi could definitely imaging this happening...
(B
(B> Regards,
(B> 
(B> ---
(B> Kendall Bennett
(B> Chief Executive Officer
(B> SciTech Software, Inc.
(B> Phone: (530) 894 8400
(B> http://www.scitechsoft.com
(B> 
(B> ~ SciTech SNAP - The future of device driver technology! ~
(B> 
(B> ___
(B> Devel mailing list
(B> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B> http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
(B
(B
(B-- 
(B--- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" 
(BThe Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)[EMAIL PROTECTED]
$B7'<*(B - $Bhttp://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: ATI Imageon 100

2003-07-30 Thread Kendall Bennett
Hannes Reinecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > Also, I think this is a different movie. The embbeded market is
> > different to the desktop one.  
> 
> Hmm, have you tried asking trolltech?
> After all, they did do the QT GUI for the Zaurus and presumably would need
> to know how to access the framebuffer, this being embedded. So one would
> assume that _some_ docs must have been available ...

TrollTech uses the Linux framebuffer and does not have acceleration 
support except for a small number of sample drivers (Mach64, Matrox and 
Voodoo3). Hence if Qt works on that device, it just uses a dumb 
framebuffer and whatever is exported by the kernel via the framebuffer 
interface.

Regards,

---
Kendall Bennett
Chief Executive Officer
SciTech Software, Inc.
Phone: (530) 894 8400
http://www.scitechsoft.com

~ SciTech SNAP - The future of device driver technology! ~

___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: ATI Imageon 100

2003-07-30 Thread Tim Roberts
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 10:43:42 +0100, Matthew Allum wrote:
>
>on Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 11:04:35AM -0700, Tim Roberts wrote:
> 
>> Didn't we just see this movie?  What's their incentive to do so?  The people 
>> who are selling IMAGEON-based devices want Windows CE, and ATI is happy to 
>> help those people with CE drivers.
>
>Also, I think this is a different movie. The embbeded market is
>different to the desktop one.  

Yes, but if anything, the situation is even worse in the embedded market.

In the general computing world, the vendor has to worry about both OEM sales 
and retail sales.  In the embedded world, you ONLY have OEM sales.  You cannot 
go out and buy an Imageon 100 add-in card for your Zaurus, so there is even 
less incentive for the chip vendor to provide any public support.  Their 
consumer is the OEM.  If the OEM is happy, ATI is happy.

--
- Tim Roberts, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc.


___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: ATI Imageon 100

2003-07-30 Thread Matthew Allum
Hi

on Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 12:04:26PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> >
> Hmm, have you tried asking trolltech?
> After all, they did do the QT GUI for the Zaurus and presumably would 
> need to know how to access the framebuffer, this being embedded. So one 
> would assume that _some_ docs must have been available ...

>From what I could tell judging by how it performed on the C700, qt is
just writing strait to the framebuffer device as well ( which there is
cryptic source for ). I suspect and would hope this has changed in the
newer C7xx's ( which afaik still have Imageons ).

Also considering kdrive essentially is a competitor to qte Im not sure
how helpful they'd be...

Many thanks;

  -- Matthew
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: ATI Imageon 100

2003-07-30 Thread Hannes Reinecke
Matthew Allum wrote:
Hi;

[ snip ]
ATI do mention on there Imageon page they support 'Linux mobile'. Just
wondering where/what that is
Also, I think this is a different movie. The embbeded market is
different to the desktop one.  

Hmm, have you tried asking trolltech?
After all, they did do the QT GUI for the Zaurus and presumably would 
need to know how to access the framebuffer, this being embedded. So one 
would assume that _some_ docs must have been available ...

Cheers,

Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SuSE Linux AG   S390 & zSeries
Deutschherrnstr. 15-19  +49 911 74053 688
90429 Nürnberg  http://www.suse.de
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: ATI Imageon 100

2003-07-30 Thread Matthew Allum
Hi;

on Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 11:04:35AM -0700, Tim Roberts wrote:
 
> The IMAGEON 100 will never be a stellar performer.  It was designed for low 
> cost and low power, not high performance.  It does have a simple blitter, and 
> it has a reasonable YUV overlay, but the motion compensation acceleration is 
> only slightly better than straight software.
>

I dont think were expecting 'stellar' performance here, just
reasonable will do - the current situation is ~700 k/sec bandwidth in
certain xrandr orientations. 
 
> There is an O/S-independent (theoretically) acceleration layer for the 
> IMAGEONs, but it is ATI-proprietary, and to my knowledge is only released to 
> their partners.
> 

I think parts of this are exposed in the w100 framebuffer driver ( in
the sharp kernels source ), though its pretty much undocumented and I
dont really wanna risk boiling a 400$ lcd poking it. 

> >So please if anyone from ATI is listening, please consider to support an
> >XFree86 driver development!
> 
> Didn't we just see this movie?  What's their incentive to do so?  The people 
> who are selling IMAGEON-based devices want Windows CE, and ATI is happy to 
> help those people with CE drivers.
> 

ATI do mention on there Imageon page they support 'Linux mobile'. Just
wondering where/what that is

Also, I think this is a different movie. The embbeded market is
different to the desktop one.  

Many thanks;

  -- Matthew Allum


___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: ATI Imageon 100

2003-07-29 Thread Tim Roberts
On 29 Jul 2003 17:06:47 +0200, Nils Faerber wrote:
>
>I am looking for a good contact to ATI for information about their
>embedded graphics controller IMAGEON 100. This one is used in some Casio
>and especially the new Sharp PDAs (Zaurus CL-700, 750 and 760).
>We want to write an accelerated XFree86 driver for it so that
>handhelds.org Linux using X11 and GPE could run more efficiently on it.
>Currently there is only an undocumented Linux kernel framebuffer driver
>which is quite slow.
>
>Using the acceleration features of the chip we should be able to get
>decent performance and nice features like hardware accelrated rotation
>and even MPEG acceleration.
>Without we get a crawlingly slow desktop :(

The IMAGEON 100 will never be a stellar performer.  It was designed for low 
cost and low power, not high performance.  It does have a simple blitter, and 
it has a reasonable YUV overlay, but the motion compensation acceleration is 
only slightly better than straight software.

There is an O/S-independent (theoretically) acceleration layer for the 
IMAGEONs, but it is ATI-proprietary, and to my knowledge is only released to 
their partners.

>So please if anyone from ATI is listening, please consider to support an
>XFree86 driver development!

Didn't we just see this movie?  What's their incentive to do so?  The people 
who are selling IMAGEON-based devices want Windows CE, and ATI is happy to 
help those people with CE drivers.

Your plea is well-intentioned, but if I were you, I would not hold my breath.

--
- Tim Roberts, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc.


___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


ATI Imageon 100

2003-07-29 Thread Nils Faerber
Hi all!
This is not yet XFree86 related but hopefully will be :)

I am looking for a good contact to ATI for information about their
embedded graphics controller IMAGEON 100. This one is used in some Casio
and especially the new Sharp PDAs (Zaurus CL-700, 750 and 760).
We want to write an accelerated XFree86 driver for it so that
handhelds.org Linux using X11 and GPE could run more efficiently on it.
Currently there is only an undocumented Linux kernel framebuffer driver
which is quite slow.

Using the acceleration features of the chip we should be able to get
decent performance and nice features like hardware accelrated rotation
and even MPEG acceleration.
Without we get a crawlingly slow desktop :(

Main target machine would be at first the Zaurus CL-7xx machines but not
limited to them. Higher resolution screens slowly become a standard and
thus the need for a decent driver will become more urgent on other
embedded XFree86 capable platforms too.

So please if anyone from ATI is listening, please consider to support an
XFree86 driver development! If your are interested, please write to this
list or email me.

If none is listening but someone who knows someone at ATI who could be
of help, please speak up!

If there is someone who knows anything else that there is to know about
such a development, ... please say so too, of course.

Many thanks in advance!

CU
  nils faerber

-- 
kernel concepts  Tel: +49-271-771091-12
Dreisbachstr. 24 Fax: +49-271-771091-19
D-57250 Netphen  D1 : +49-170-2729106
--

___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel