Bugzilla #228 claims that the handling of iso8859-15 in COMPOUND_TEXT is incorrect. According to the ctext documentation no extended segments should be used for any approved standard encoding. According to the newer revision of this doc (xc/doc/specs/CTEXT/ctext.tbl.ms) is8859-15 is such an approved standard encoding. However XFree86 contains code to grant backward compatibility to XFree86 3.x that uses extended encodings for this.
How importand is the backward compatibility to versions of Xlib for 3.x? Should we remove this code which makes our COMPOUND_TEXT handling violate the specs? Egbert. _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
