Re: [Development] FW: Alpha 2 this week or skip it
On 31.5.2012 18.00, Thiago Macieirathiago.macie...@intel.com wrote: On quinta-feira, 31 de maio de 2012 13.48.42, simo.f...@nokia.com wrote: What kind of src packages people are looking for? There was some discussion earlier about tarring each submodule separately, but somehow I got the impression that eventually wasn't the one people wanted. Did I miss something? Every single packager wants the split packages. That should be the official format for source distribution. That's how we are doing it at the moment. Separate installable src package for each submodule. Our CI already produces these submodule src packages and right now we are writing configurations templates for the SDK installer. The same applies for the binary packages as well, this is under work. - iikka -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027 Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development -- Br, Mr. Iikka Eklund Senior software engineer Elektronikkatie 10 FI-90590 Oulu Email: iikka.ekl...@digia.com Visit us at: www.digia.com or qt.digia.com -- PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and any attachments are intended only for use by the named addressee and may contain privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, copy or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete the message and any attachments accompanying it. Digia Plc does not accept liability for any corruption, interception, amendment, tampering or viruses occurring to this message. -- ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] FW: Alpha 2 this week or skip it
msvc2012 goes RC stage, I think QT 5.0 should support it from now. Itsn't it? 2012/6/1 Iikka Eklund iikka.ekl...@digia.com: On 31.5.2012 18.00, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote: On quinta-feira, 31 de maio de 2012 13.48.42, simo.f...@nokia.com wrote: What kind of src packages people are looking for? There was some discussion earlier about tarring each submodule separately, but somehow I got the impression that eventually wasn't the one people wanted. Did I miss something? Every single packager wants the split packages. That should be the official format for source distribution. That's how we are doing it at the moment. Separate installable src package for each submodule. Our CI already produces these submodule src packages and right now we are writing configurations templates for the SDK installer. The same applies for the binary packages as well, this is under work. - iikka -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027 Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development -- Br, Mr. Iikka Eklund Senior software engineer Elektronikkatie 10 FI-90590 Oulu Email: iikka.ekl...@digia.com Visit us at: www.digia.com or qt.digia.com -- PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and any attachments are intended only for use by the named addressee and may contain privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, copy or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete the message and any attachments accompanying it. Digia Plc does not accept liability for any corruption, interception, amendment, tampering or viruses occurring to this message. -- ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
[Development] About the QtDir::currentPath
Hi, My QtDir::currentPath is /c_drive/ instead of C:/, so do someone know the reason behind ? And how can it be as C:/ ? Any information is appreciated ;) Thanks, Song ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Does the QtWidgets in Qt5 support touch event handling ?
Hi, Yes, touch events are delivered to QWidgets too, just like in Qt 4. Regards, Laszlo On 06/01/2012 11:16 AM, ext song.7@nokia.com wrote: Hi, In Qt5, does the QtWidgets support the touch event handling ? That the touch event is routed from my side to system by invoking QWindowSystemInterface::handleTouchEvent... Thanks, Song ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] On QML, ownership, QObject-trees and QSharedPointer
Step 1: mySharedPtr.data() == MyShared* P; Step 2: make sure the QML engine doesn't assume ownership: QDeclarativeEngine::**setObjectOwnership Step 3: hand over P to QML: setProperty or setContextProperty Yep, those steps seem to be the current requirement. If my patches get in (not guaranteed), it will be reduced to just: Step 1: setContextProperty(myname, mySharedPtr); or Step 1: setContextProperty(myname, mySharedPtr.toWeakRef()); depending on your needs. When I said the database layer should preferably remain QML agnostic, I merely wanted to keep patchup code like setObjectOwnership out of a clean set of data classes for purist reasons. (Really it is an exaggeration imho.. I have no problem using stuff from QtDeclarative in code. Will need it for QList properties anyway. It's just a design reflex). Yes, I agree. Leaving out step 2 is bad, right? Yes, and worse it might not obvious to consumers of the API that it's needed. Hi again. I have modified the wiki page that Sivan started (my name in qt-project.orgis Centipede). In my view your advice above is serious enough to warrant a user comment in the footnote section of at least the documentation pages of 4.8. But I cannot for the life of me figure out where to add such comments. Is qt-project.org's user comment system up and running? Best regards, Rene Jensen ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] About the QtDir::currentPath
There are a number of places in src/corelib/io where C:/ type paths are
handled specially under a windows ifdef.
(or in 4.8 windows/symbian ifdef)
If you want to use windows style paths, you have to add your OS ifdef there as
well.
If the native paths are unix style, i'd recommend to use unix style paths
everywhere though
--
-Original Message-
From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org
[mailto:development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org]
On Behalf Of song.7@nokia.com
Sent: 01 June 2012 09:05
To: si...@omniqueue.com
Cc: development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] About the QtDir::currentPath
Ok, thanks... I am using the qfilesystemengine_unix under another unix
like env, so I can make a change in the ::rootPath for my case...
Thanks for your sharing ;)
Thanks,
Song
-Original Message-
From: siv...@gmail.com [mailto:siv...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of ext Sivan
Greenberg
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 4:02 PM
To: Liu Song.7 (Nokia-MP/Beijing)
Cc: development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] About the QtDir::currentPath
Importance: High
What's your windows version? I can see the code (in qt5) makes
distinction between WinCE and the rest.
Seeing this respective code:
}
998
999 //static
1000 QString QFileSystemEngine::rootPath()
1001 {
1002 #if defined(Q_OS_WINCE)
1003 QString ret = QLatin1String(/);
1004 #else
1005 QString ret =
QString::fromLatin1(qgetenv(SystemDrive).constData());
1006 if (ret.isEmpty())
1007 ret = QLatin1String(c:);
1008 ret.append(QLatin1Char('/'));
1009 #endif
1010 return ret;
1011 }
I would take a wild guess that you're qt thinks it should return paths
on WinCE instead of 'regular' windows.
-Sivan
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 10:45 AM, song.7@nokia.com wrote:
Hi,
My QtDir::currentPath is /c_drive/ instead of C:/, so do someone know
the reason behind ?
And how can it be as C:/ ?
Any information is appreciated ;)
Thanks,
Song
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
--
-Sivan
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Subject to local law, communications with Accenture and its affiliates
including telephone calls and emails (including content), may be monitored by
our systems for the purposes of security and the assessment of internal
compliance with Accenture policy.
__
www.accenture.com
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] FW: Alpha 2 this week or skip it
On 01/06/2012 14:21, ext Joerg Bornemann wrote: msvc2012 goes RC stage, I think QT 5.0 should support it from now. Itsn't it? There is no such thing as msvc2012. Allright, I take back everything. MS actually announced the RC of Visual Studio 2012 yesterday: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudio/archive/2012/05/31/visual-studio-2012-rc-available-now.aspx This seems to be identical to the formerly announced Visual Studio 11. Thus support is in Qt. Just use the win32-msvc11 mkspec. BR, Jörg ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Stepping down
On Friday 01 Jun 2012 13:37:48 Paweł Polański wrote: Hi, due to the fact that I have no longer enough time to maintain Symbian in Qt Creator's Project Management Targets I would like to step down from this position. My symbian knowledge is rather limited. I will be looking over any gerrit change requests or bug reports, but I would consider the symbian support to be in pratice unmaintained. That is, I'm seeking help with that part of Creator, be it by submitting patches or by voluntering for maintainer, as otherwise it'll will break and will get removed eventually. daniel ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] FW: Alpha 2 this week or skip it
On sexta-feira, 1 de junho de 2012 14.40.19, Joerg Bornemann wrote: On 01/06/2012 14:21, ext Joerg Bornemann wrote: msvc2012 goes RC stage, I think QT 5.0 should support it from now. Itsn't it? There is no such thing as msvc2012. Allright, I take back everything. MS actually announced the RC of Visual Studio 2012 yesterday: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudio/archive/2012/05/31/visual-studio-2012-r c-available-now.aspx This seems to be identical to the formerly announced Visual Studio 11. Thus support is in Qt. Just use the win32-msvc11 mkspec. We should rename the mkspec. The version is 11.0, but the marketing name is 2012. And the internal _MSC_VER is probably around 1700 already :-) -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027 Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] FW: Alpha 2 this week or skip it
On 01/06/2012 15:30, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: Allright, I take back everything. MS actually announced the RC of Visual Studio 2012 yesterday: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudio/archive/2012/05/31/visual-studio-2012-r c-available-now.aspx This seems to be identical to the formerly announced Visual Studio 11. Thus support is in Qt. Just use the win32-msvc11 mkspec. We should rename the mkspec. I agree...if that's really the final product name. ;-) Cheers, Jörg ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] FW: Alpha 2 this week or skip it
On 1 June 2012 15:54, Joerg Bornemann joerg.bornem...@nokia.com wrote: On 01/06/2012 15:30, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: Allright, I take back everything. MS actually announced the RC of Visual Studio 2012 yesterday: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudio/archive/2012/05/31/visual-studio-2012-r c-available-now.aspx This seems to be identical to the formerly announced Visual Studio 11. Thus support is in Qt. Just use the win32-msvc11 mkspec. We should rename the mkspec. I agree...if that's really the final product name. ;-) Don't forget that the Microsoft Visual Studio and Microsoft Visual C(++) version number don't have to match. The Visual Studio number are generally years (recently: 2005, 2008, 2010 and now 2012) while Visual C(++) is numbered more normally (respectively: 8.0, 9.0 10.0 and now probably 11.0). So the new one could be Visual Studio 2012 with Visual C++ compiler 11.0. Also, in future Microsoft are planning decoupling the IDE from the compiler so we should keep the mkspec following the compiler I guess. -- Matt Williams http://milliams.com ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] FW: Alpha 2 this week or skip it
On sexta-feira, 1 de junho de 2012 16.11.33, Matt Williams wrote: On 1 June 2012 15:54, Joerg Bornemann joerg.bornem...@nokia.com wrote: On 01/06/2012 15:30, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: Allright, I take back everything. MS actually announced the RC of Visual Studio 2012 yesterday: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudio/archive/2012/05/31/visual-studio-20 12-r c-available-now.aspx This seems to be identical to the formerly announced Visual Studio 11. Thus support is in Qt. Just use the win32-msvc11 mkspec. We should rename the mkspec. I agree...if that's really the final product name. ;-) Don't forget that the Microsoft Visual Studio and Microsoft Visual C(++) version number don't have to match. The Visual Studio number are generally years (recently: 2005, 2008, 2010 and now 2012) while Visual C(++) is numbered more normally (respectively: 8.0, 9.0 10.0 and now probably 11.0). So the new one could be Visual Studio 2012 with Visual C++ compiler 11.0. Also, in future Microsoft are planning decoupling the IDE from the compiler so we should keep the mkspec following the compiler I guess. Right. We've been doing it wrong all along, then: our mkspecs say msvc which is the compiler, but give the year as the complement. Maybe we should then start correcting this by keeping msvc11. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027 Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] FW: Alpha 2 this week or skip it
nice thing: the latest source package already have win32-msvc11 mkspec. btw, Is there would win32-clang appears? 2012/6/1 Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com: On sexta-feira, 1 de junho de 2012 16.11.33, Matt Williams wrote: On 1 June 2012 15:54, Joerg Bornemann joerg.bornem...@nokia.com wrote: On 01/06/2012 15:30, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: Allright, I take back everything. MS actually announced the RC of Visual Studio 2012 yesterday: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudio/archive/2012/05/31/visual-studio-20 12-r c-available-now.aspx This seems to be identical to the formerly announced Visual Studio 11. Thus support is in Qt. Just use the win32-msvc11 mkspec. We should rename the mkspec. I agree...if that's really the final product name. ;-) Don't forget that the Microsoft Visual Studio and Microsoft Visual C(++) version number don't have to match. The Visual Studio number are generally years (recently: 2005, 2008, 2010 and now 2012) while Visual C(++) is numbered more normally (respectively: 8.0, 9.0 10.0 and now probably 11.0). So the new one could be Visual Studio 2012 with Visual C++ compiler 11.0. Also, in future Microsoft are planning decoupling the IDE from the compiler so we should keep the mkspec following the compiler I guess. Right. We've been doing it wrong all along, then: our mkspecs say msvc which is the compiler, but give the year as the complement. Maybe we should then start correcting this by keeping msvc11. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027 Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] FW: Alpha 2 this week or skip it
On sábado, 2 de junho de 2012 00.18.48, techabc wrote: btw, Is there would win32-clang appears? That sentence did not make sense. I'm assuming you meant to ask is there a chance a win32-clang option would appear? Yes, there's a chance. Contribute the mkspec that works for you and we'll add it. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027 Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] FW: Alpha 2 this week or skip it
On 6/1/12 12:46 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: On sábado, 2 de junho de 2012 00.18.48, techabc wrote: btw, Is there would win32-clang appears? That sentence did not make sense. I'm assuming you meant to ask is there a chance a win32-clang option would appear? Yes, there's a chance. Contribute the mkspec that works for you and we'll add it. This is kind of OT but is there even a working Win32 clang compiler? Last time I hear they are still have problem with MFC and other MS headers. ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] How to submit Portuguese, Spanish, and Indonesian translations Qt?
Hello Giuseppe, Thanks for the information. I spent some time today reading the wiki from the links you sent - lots of helpful information. I assume the right people are aware of this, but probably half the links in the Contributions section things you generally need to know of http://qt-project.org/wiki/Category:Developing_Qt point to blank pages. Since we are only using 4.7.4 at this point I don't know about 4.8. So I guess I will not be able to submit our translations at this time, if I understand you correctly. We expect to use version 5 when it is available, and may end up using 4.8 at some point in the meantime. Then we'll be able to contribute our translations that apply. By that time I imagine the blank articles will have been written and I expect we'll be able to figure out what to do. Thanks! David -Original Message- From: Giuseppe D'Angelo [mailto:dange...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 12:52 PM To: David Burson Cc: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] How to submit Portuguese, Spanish, and Indonesian translations Qt? Hello David, On 1 June 2012 15:36, David Burson david_bur...@ntm.org wrote: Hi, We translated some of Qt 4.7.4 into Indonesian (qt_id), and we added some translations to qt_pt and qt_es. How do I submit them back to the Qt project? Do your translations still apply to 4.8? No more 4.7 releases are planned. - What pri/pro files need to change? Maybe none? - Where do I run make commit-ts? In the translations subdirectory, I think. - How do I make a merge request on Gitorious? I went to https://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qt, but I don't know what I'm supposed to do. Gitorious is not used any more to submit patches to Qt. Please read the instructions on the wiki http://qt-project.org/wiki/Category:Developing_Qt http://qt-project.org/wiki/Qt-Contribution-Guidelines http://qt-project.org/wiki/Code_Reviews HTH, -- Giuseppe D'Angelo ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
[Development] Qt CS videos of module maintainers
(((Posting here to reach module maintainers and humans alike))) Most Qt Essentials module maintainers will be at the Qt Contributors Summit and we want to take this chance to shot video interviews to be edited and be part of the Qt 5 launch. The idea of these interviews is to explain to the masses what the module does, why it's important in Qt 5 and what is new interesting. I need to come up with the exact list of people to interview, in order to arrange time slots with them. If you are a maintainer and you are happy with the idea please send me an email (if you are not happy send me the email as well). ;) Questions: - No offense but... do all the modules need to be featured to give an overall picture of Qt 5? Looking at http://qt-project.org/wiki/Qt-Essentials-Modules I wonder about Qt JS Backend, Qt SQL Qt Test. Also, would it make sense to have a single person to cover Qt GUI, Qt QML Qt Quick? This would make 5 interviews less (7 maintainers + Lars). - Is there an add-on module maintainer that should get a video interview as well? Qt Wayland fit in the buzzword count. ;) - Qt Platform Abstraction is a top topic. Should we have a speaker? Who? - If the maintainer won't make it to the interview then he needs to nominate the speaker. Also a question to those that have been to the venue: what is the best place to have these interviews? The video company can bring a but of furniture for a cozy corner in the main hall, I guess it shouldn't be too noisy during sessions. Is it outside in the terrace an alternative? Another option would be to borrow a Seminaar room during lunch breaks. Ideas welcome - it's difficult to decide without having been there. -- Quim ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] FW: Alpha 2 this week or skip it
If it realy wrong, we should rename win32-msvc2010 - win32-msvc10, msvc2008 - win32-msvc9 ... 2012/6/1 Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com Right. We've been doing it wrong all along, then: our mkspecs say msvc which is the compiler, but give the year as the complement. Maybe we should then start correcting this by keeping msvc11. -- Please don't ask where I come from, It's a shame! Best Regards Yuchen ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
