Re: [Development] Focusing bug fixes to 5.9 branch and patch releases during H1/17

2017-02-28 Thread Lars Knoll 
Hi,

sorry for answering only now to this thread, I was on vacation last week. 

Let’s conclude this topic now by moving on towards 5.9 as Tuukka proposed. 
After some thinking I also agree that this is the best course of action from 
where we are right now.

This is certainly not a great solution, ideally we should have the capability 
of making both 5.9 in time and push out 5.8 and 5.6 patch level releases. This 
is currently not working and I’ll be following up on this. My goal is to make 
sure we identify all the issues in our current release infrastructure, fix at 
least the worst things that make creating patch level releases difficult until 
5.9, and have a clear roadmap for the remaining items. I really don’t want this 
to happen again.

The other thing I’ll take from this is to have another look at the interaction 
between TQtC and the Qt project. I do see a conflict here in how we handle the 
release planning between the Company and the Project, and we’ll need to find a 
better (or more clearly defined and agreed) way on how we jointly create the 
release roadmap.

Cheers,
Lars

> On 20 Feb 2017, at 13:56, Tuukka Turunen  wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On 18/02/2017, 21.40, "Development on behalf of Thiago Macieira" 
>> > thiago.macie...@intel.com> wrote:
>> 
>>   On sábado, 18 de fevereiro de 2017 12:11:53 PST Mat Sutcliffe wrote:
>>> On 18 February 2017 at 19:13, Thiago Macieira 
>>> My point was that this decision happened already on 29 November. That was
>>> the original planned release date for 5.8.0, and also the day on which the
>>> 5.9.0 initial schedule was set. Could it have been predicted at that time
>>> what the consequences might be for 5.8.1?
>> 
>>   Hindsight is 20/20. Let's not rehash coulda-woulda-shoulda.
>> 
>>   The question is only what to do now.
> 
> What I hope we can do is to have everyone helping to get Qt 5.9.0 out as soon 
> as possible and then make also 5.9.1 soon (although I think we do need to 
> make 5.6.3 in between).
> 
> If we can have the extra help proposed by KDAB and others in the community 
> for making Qt 5.8.1 release geared towards making Qt 5.9 we will be able to 
> make it faster and with higher quality than otherwise possible. 
> 
> One concrete item is manual testing of our various snapshots. The sooner 
> these are fully tested, the better. We have CI and RTA test automation, but 
> these do not cover every aspect. Manual testing is needed as well. Often it 
> is a case that a bug is found in quite late release steps, but has actually 
> been there for some time already. Another way to help is making good bug 
> reports that are also notified to the release team. The better the 
> description of the issue, the easier it is to fix it. Third item is of course 
> fixing things quickly – by having more people fixing the issues identified we 
> will be able to close them sooner and thus proceed faster. 
> 
> For the CI stability most important thing is to reduce the amount of flaky 
> test cases, which cause failures in CI runs. This in turn both adds delay as 
> well as increases the load of the CI. 
> 
> Yours,
> 
>   Tuukka
> 
> ___
> Development mailing list
> Development@qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9 alpha & mapbox-gl-native on windows ?

2017-02-28 Thread Thiago Marcos P. Santos 
> But what desktop platform (if any) is most stable right now for mapboxgl?


We tested it on OSX, Linux (Ubuntu, but CI bot is passing on RHL and
Yocto too), iOS and Android.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

[Development] CI: module "NIL" (NIL)

2017-02-28 Thread Marc Mutz 
Hi,

Something's wonky with the CI:

e.g. https://codereview.qt-project.org/186905
(http://testresults.qt.io/coin/integration/qt/qtbase/tasks/1488304949)

Thanks,
Marc

-- 
Marc Mutz  | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company
Tel: +49-30-521325470
KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9 API review

2017-02-28 Thread Edward Welbourne 
Jani Heikkinen (28 February 2017 11:09):

> It seems Qt 5.9 API review is still badly ongoing, see
[snip]

FTR, we have some on-going fixes in progress in qtbase.

> Please finalize the reviews & do needed fixes as soon as possible so that we 
> will be ready for beta early enough.

If your module has had updates to fix any API issues found by the review
so far, please do let me know (no need to Cc the list) and I'll update
its API review,

Eddy.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9 API review

2017-02-28 Thread Sean Harmer 
On Tuesday 28 February 2017 10:09:13 Jani Heikkinen wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> It seems Qt 5.9 API review is still badly ongoing, see

> https://codereview.qt-project.org/184392qt3d

We went through this last week and resulted in:

https://bugreports.qt.io/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=48

We're now working through those as best we can. We may need another pass on 
the animation stuff but that's a tech preview for 5.9 so not absolutely 
critical.

Cheers,

Sean

> Please finalize the reviews & do needed fixes as soon as possible so that we
> will be ready for beta early enough.
> 
> br,
> Jani Heikkinen
> Release Manager
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Development mailing list
> Development@qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

--
Dr Sean Harmer | sean.har...@kdab.com | Managing Director UK
Klarälvdalens Datakonsult AB, a KDAB Group company
Tel. UK +44 (0)1625 809908, Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090
KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-independent software solutions
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

[Development] Qt 5.9 API review

2017-02-28 Thread Jani Heikkinen 
Hi all,

It seems Qt 5.9 API review is still badly ongoing, see 

https://codereview.qt-project.org/184384qtbase
https://codereview.qt-project.org/184385qtsvg
https://codereview.qt-project.org/184386qtdeclarative
https://codereview.qt-project.org/184387qtactiveqt
https://codereview.qt-project.org/184388qtlocation
https://codereview.qt-project.org/184389qtsensors
https://codereview.qt-project.org/184390qtconnectivity
https://codereview.qt-project.org/184391qtwayland
https://codereview.qt-project.org/184392qt3d
https://codereview.qt-project.org/184393qtserialbus
https://codereview.qt-project.org/184394qtwebsockets
https://codereview.qt-project.org/184395qtwebengine
https://codereview.qt-project.org/184396qtquickcontrols2
https://codereview.qt-project.org/184397qtcharts
https://codereview.qt-project.org/184398qtdatavis3d
https://codereview.qt-project.org/184399qtgamepad
https://codereview.qt-project.org/184400qtscxml

Please finalize the reviews & do needed fixes as soon as possible so that we 
will be ready for beta early enough.

br,
Jani Heikkinen
Release Manager



___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9 alpha & mapbox-gl-native on windows ?

2017-02-28 Thread Alexander Ivash 
>> but we are unsure if we'll be able to ship the mapboxgl plugin for windows 
>> with 5.9
Thank you for reply Paolo, will keep fingers crossed then.

But what desktop platform (if any) is most stable right now for mapboxgl?

Regards, Alexander

2017-02-27 23:11 GMT+03:00 Paolo Angelelli :
> Hi Alexander,
>
> we are trying, but we are unsure if we'll be able to ship the mapboxgl plugin 
> for windows with 5.9.
> In any case, i believe that, if not, mapbox might make it available outside 
> the qt sdk as an additional plugin.
>
> regards
> 
> From: Development [development-bounces+paolo.angelelli=qt...@qt-project.org] 
> on behalf of Alexander Ivash [elder...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 6:44 PM
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: [Development] Qt 5.9 alpha & mapbox-gl-native on windows ?
>
> Is it planned to enable mapbox-gl-native building for windows? If yes,
> then when?
>
> Alexander
> ___
> Development mailing list
> Development@qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Re: [Development] Fwd: Qt contributions

2017-02-28 Thread Marco Piccolino 
Hi Zoltan,

you might also want to take a look at this project which supports admobs,
startad.mobi among others:

https://github.com/kafeg/adctl

Also, we have a Slack chat dedicated to professional Qt mobile application
developers that you can join:

http://slackin.qtmob.org

If your solution is interesting to some you might find a few hands willing
to help out with your wrapper.

All best,
Marco

2017-02-26 10:34 GMT+01:00 :

> Send Development mailing list submissions to
> development@qt-project.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> development-requ...@qt-project.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> development-ow...@qt-project.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Development digest..."
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>1. Re: Request moving project (noron) to playground area
>   (Riitta-Leena Miettinen)
>2. Re: Request moving project (noron) to playground area
>   (Mat Sutcliffe)
>3. Re: [Announce] Qt 5.9.0 Alpha released (Jason H)
>4. Fwd: Qt contributions (Zolt?n Lutor)
>
>
> -- Messaggio inoltrato --
> From: Riitta-Leena Miettinen 
> To: "development@qt-project.org" 
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 14:56:22 +
> Subject: Re: [Development] Request moving project (noron) to playground
> area
> > Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 14:30:20 +
> > From: "Stottlemyer, Brett (B.S.)" 
> > To: Qt development mailing list 
> > Subject: Re: [Development] Request moving project (noron) to
> >   playground area
> > Message-ID: <186aed03-a598-4668-a6d7-1686b796c...@ford.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> >
> > > On 2/24/17, 9:29 AM, "Andr? Hartmann" 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >Hi Brett,
> > >
> > >   Have a look at http://doc-snapshots.qt.io/
> >
> > Didn?t even know that was there.
> >
> > I was excited for a moment, but for some reason QtRO isn?t included in
> the
> > TP section.
> > http://doc-snapshots.qt.io/qt5-5.9/qtmodules.html#technology-preview-
> > modules
> >
> > What needs to happen to get QtRO added?  Again, the docs are part of the
> > module.
> >
>
> Hello Brett,
>
> You could submit a patch that adds a link to the table that lists all Qt
> modules. There are some other tasks involved, too. Here is a link to a
> checklist for adding documentation for a new Qt module:
>
> http://wiki.qt.io/Checklist_for_Adding_Documentation_for_a_New_Module
>
> Leena
>
>
> Leena Miettinen
> Documentation Engineer
>
> The Qt Company Germany GmbH
> Rudower Chaussee 13
> D-12489, Berlin, Germany
> Geschäftsführer: Mika Pälsi, Juha Varelius, Mika Harjuaho
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin, Registergericht: Amtsgericht
> Charlottenburg, HRB 144331 B
> riitta-leena.mietti...@qt.io
> +49 30 63 92 3255
> http://qt.io
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -- Messaggio inoltrato --
> From: Mat Sutcliffe 
> To: "development@qt-project.org" 
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 18:42:32 +
> Subject: Re: [Development] Request moving project (noron) to playground
> area
> Until the link is added, you can visit the direct URL
> http://doc-snapshots.qt.io/qt5-5.9/qtremoteobjects-index.html
>
>
> -- Messaggio inoltrato --
> From: Jason H 
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 20:59:28 +0100
> Subject: Re: [Development] [Announce] Qt 5.9.0 Alpha released
>
> > Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 at 4:55 AM
> > From: "List for announcements regarding Qt releases and development" <
> annou...@qt-project.org>
> > To: "annou...@qt-project.org" 
> > Subject: [Development] [Announce] Qt 5.9.0 Alpha released
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am happy to inform that Qt 5.9.0 Alpha release is out, see
> http://blog.qt.io/blog/2017/02/23/qt-5-9-alpha-released/
> >
>
> Is there a blocker bug issue in JIRA? Since there are no maintenance
> releases planned until 5.9, I have two issues:
> https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-56536 - Nougat camera preview is
> upside down (P1: Reported 6 months ago)
> https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-58278 - QML Websockets only connect
> once (P2: Commercial support started Dec 9, 2016, reported Jan 19)
>
>
>
>
>
> -- Messaggio inoltrato --
> From: "Zoltán Lutor" 
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 10:34:51 +0100
> Subject: [Development] Fwd: Qt contributions
> Hi,
>
> I would like to ask help/guidance how the sw mentioned below could be part
> of official Qt package.
>
> Or, if that is not possible - due to lack of interest