[Development] HEADS-UP: Branching from '5.11' -> '5.11.1' started

2018-06-01 Thread Jani Heikkinen
Hi,

We have soft branched 5.11.1 from 5.11 today. Target is to finalize branching & 
have final downmerge from '5.11' -> '5.11.1' Thu 7.6.2018. 

Please start using '5.11.1' for new changes targeted to Qt 5.11.1 release.

br,
Jani Heikkinen
Release Manager
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development


Re: [Development] State of LGPL exception after migration to LGPLv3

2018-06-01 Thread Lars Knoll
> On 1 Jun 2018, at 08:28, Edward Welbourne  wrote:
> 
> Em segunda-feira, 17 de abril de 2017, às 04:24:25 PDT, Konstantin Tokarev 
> escreveu:
 1. Is it still legal to incorporate "inline functions and templates"
 into code not covered by LGPLv3? In particular, I'm interested in
 qAsConst
> 
> On 17 Apr 2017, at 18:07, Thiago Macieira  wrote:
>>> The LGPLv3 text contains the equivalent exception. See LICENSE.LGPLv3
>>> section 3 "Object Code Incorporating Material from Library Header
>>> Files."
> 
> Lars Knoll (18 April 2017 10:38)
>> The LGPL_EXCEPTION.txt files should get removed from our
>> sources. LGPLv3 covers this case directly.
> 
> Trippng over this in the tail of my in-box the other day, I checked and
> found it hadn't happened so, after checking with Lars, got on with it.
> The LGPL_EXCEPTION files are now gone (last integrated this morning).

Thanks Eddy!

Lars

___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development


Re: [Development] State of LGPL exception after migration to LGPLv3

2018-06-01 Thread Edward Welbourne
Em segunda-feira, 17 de abril de 2017, às 04:24:25 PDT, Konstantin Tokarev 
escreveu:
>>> 1. Is it still legal to incorporate "inline functions and templates"
>>> into code not covered by LGPLv3? In particular, I'm interested in
>>> qAsConst

On 17 Apr 2017, at 18:07, Thiago Macieira  wrote:
>> The LGPLv3 text contains the equivalent exception. See LICENSE.LGPLv3
>> section 3 "Object Code Incorporating Material from Library Header
>> Files."

Lars Knoll (18 April 2017 10:38)
> The LGPL_EXCEPTION.txt files should get removed from our
> sources. LGPLv3 covers this case directly.

Trippng over this in the tail of my in-box the other day, I checked and
found it hadn't happened so, after checking with Lars, got on with it.
The LGPL_EXCEPTION files are now gone (last integrated this morning).

Eddy.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development