Re: [Development] Nominating Dennis Oberst for approver rights

2024-05-30 Thread Mårten Nordheim via Development
+1

Mårten


From: Development  on behalf of Alexey 
Edelev via Development 
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2024 08:46
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: [Development] Nominating Dennis Oberst for approver rights


Hi all,

I would like to nominate Dennis Oberst for approver rights in the Qt project.

Dennis joined in 2022 and did a great job in various Qt subprojects, providing 
strong patches and insightful reviews. I personally appreciate his 
contributions to QtGrpc, which he continues to make.

Changes owned:
* https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/owner:dennis.obe...@qt.io

Changes commented/voted on:
* https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/commentby:dennis.obe...@qt.io

Regards,
Alexey.


Alexey Edelev

Software Engineer

Qt Group
Erich-Thilo-Str. 10 12489
Berlin, Germany

alexey.ede...@qt.io

http://www.qt.io/

[https://s3.eu-north-1.amazonaws.com/email-signature-tool-leroy/Qt-Group-logo-black-1.png]
[https://s3.eu-north-1.amazonaws.com/email-signature-tool-leroy/facebook-x2-right.png]
  
[https://s3.eu-north-1.amazonaws.com/email-signature-tool-leroy/twitter-x2.png] 
 
[https://s3.eu-north-1.amazonaws.com/email-signature-tool-leroy/linkedin-x2.png]
 
[https://s3.eu-north-1.amazonaws.com/email-signature-tool-leroy/youtube-x2.png] 

-- 
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development


Re: [Development] Nominating Jøger Hansegård for approver rights

2024-03-15 Thread Mårten Nordheim via Development
+1


From: Development  on behalf of Tor Arne 
Vestbø via Development 
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2024 10:06
To: development
Subject: [Development] Nominating Jøger Hansegård for approver rights

Hi,

I would like to nominate Jøger Hansegård for approver rights in the Qt project.

Jøger joined The Qt Company 10 months ago and has since then been getting his 
hands dirty in Qt Multimedia, and lately focusing on color management.

Jøger is a thorough and responsible engineer and I trust that he will make a 
good approver for the Qt project.

Authored changes: 
https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/owner:joger.hansegard%2540qt.io
Reviews: https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/reviewer:joger.hansegard%2540qt.io

Cheers,
Tor Arne
-- 
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development


Re: [Development] Nominating Dr. Máté Barany as an approver for the Qt project

2024-03-07 Thread Mårten Nordheim via Development
+1


From: Development  on behalf of Tor Arne 
Vestbø via Development 
Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2024 10:27
To: Axel Spoerl
Cc: development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development]  Nominating Dr. Máté Barany as an approver for the 
Qt project

+1!

On 6 Mar 2024, at 23:09, Axel Spoerl via Development 
 wrote:

Dear Colleagues,

I hereby nominate Dr. Máté Barany as an approver for the Qt project.
Máté has been a valuable contributor and reviewer, providing sound code, 
guidance and input.
As a reference, see his dashboard 
here:https://codereview.qt-project.org/dashboard/1010490

I fully trust his advice, expertise and judgement. I am certain that he will 
exercise approver rights to the benefit of the Qt project.

I am neither working in Máté's team, nor sharing an office with him.
Máté and I do know each other personally.

Kind regards
Axel


--
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development

-- 
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development


Re: [Development] Nominating Matthias Rauter for approval status

2024-01-30 Thread Mårten Nordheim via Development
+1

Mårten


From: Development  on behalf of Paul Tvete 
via Development 
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2024 13:11
To: Qt development mailing list
Subject: [Development] Nominating Matthias Rauter for approval status

Hi,

I would like to nominate Matthias Rauter as an approver for the Qt Project.

Matthias has been working on Qt for more than a year now. In this time, he has 
done great work on Qt Location and Qt SVG, among other. I have had the pleasure 
to work with him on the Curve Rendering project in Qt Quick Shapes where he has 
made impressive contributions. He has been consistently professional in 
development and review, and I am certain that he will exercise his approver 
powers responsibly.

List of changes made by Matthias: 
https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/owner:matthias.rauter%2540qt.io
Matthias's review activity: 
https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/commentby:matthias.rauter%2540qt.io

Cheers,
 - Paul
-- 
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development


Re: [Development] Stepping down as Android maintainer

2024-01-08 Thread Mårten Nordheim via Development
Thanks for the great work BogDan!
And +1 for Assam!

Mårten


From: Development  on behalf of Przemysław 
Nogaj via Development 
Sent: Monday, January 8, 2024 10:06
To: Fabian Kosmale; development@qt-project.org; BogDan Vatra
Subject: Re: [Development] Stepping down as Android maintainer

Hard to find better person than Assam! +1




From: Development  on behalf of Fabian 
Kosmale via Development 
Sent: Monday, January 8, 2024 10:00:42 AM
To: development@qt-project.org ; BogDan Vatra 

Subject: Re: [Development] Stepping down as Android maintainer

⚠ This email originates from outside the organization or the sender could not 
be verified.

Hi,

first of all, thanks to BogDan for all the work he did on the Android port. 
We've come quite a way since
the initial days of the Necessitas project!

Next, I'll second the +1 for Assam - he has been very helpful and responsive 
with addressing issues on
the Android platform in all areas, including tooling support, solving CI 
problems and the framework code
itself.

Regards,
Fabian


Von: Development  im Auftrag von BogDan 
Vatra via Development 
Gesendet: Montag, 8. Januar 2024 09:47
An: development@qt-project.org
Betreff: [Development] Stepping down as Android maintainer

Hello there,


  I have been less active on the Android port recently and Assam has been doing 
the majority of the work maintaining the Android port.

I'm therefor stepping down as the maintainer of the Android port and nominate 
Assam to take over.


Cheers,

BogDan.


--
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

This e-mail (including any attachments) is intended solely for the use of the 
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential 
information. This message is not a binding agreement and does not conclude an 
agreement without the express confirmation of the sender’s superior or a 
director of the company.
If you are not the intended recipient, you should immediately notify the sender 
and delete the message along all the attachments. Any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or any other action is prohibited and may be illegal. No e-mail 
transmission can be guaranteed to be 100% secure or error-free, as information 
could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or 
contain viruses. Although Spyrosoft has taken precautions to ensure that this 
e-mail is free from viruses, the company does not accept liability for any 
errors or omissions in the content of this message, which arise as a result of 
the e-mail transmission. This e-mail is deemed to be professional in nature. 
Spyrosoft does not permit the employees to send emails which contravene 
provisions of the law.
-- 
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development


Re: [Development] Nominating QtGRPC & Qt Protobuf maintainers

2023-11-17 Thread Mårten Nordheim via Development
+1. Typical coworker/teammate disclaimer included.

Mårten


From: Development  on behalf of Alex 
Blasche via Development 
Sent: Monday, November 6, 2023 15:55
To: development@qt-project.org
Cc: Tatiana Borisova
Subject: [Development] Nominating QtGRPC & Qt Protobuf maintainers

Hi,

Qt GRPC and Qt Protobuf were added to Qt a while ago. However until now they 
have been in Tech Preview mode. As we investigate the remaining issues which 
might prevent us from leaving TP, we need to address the open issue of 
maintainer-ship.

I'd like to nominate Tatiana Borisova as maintainer for Qt Protobuf and Alexey 
Edelev as maintainer for Qt GRPC. In fact, both have been working on this code 
base even before they officially became part of Qt. I am glad they agreed to 
continue this work going forward in the context of Qt Development.

--
Alex

--
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
-- 
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development


Re: [Development] Nominating Ahmad Samir for approver

2023-09-11 Thread Mårten Nordheim via Development
+1

Mårten


From: Development  on behalf of Volker 
Hilsheimer via Development 
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2023 11:16
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: [Development] Nominating Ahmad Samir for approver

Hello all,

I would like to nominate Ahmad Samir for approver rights in the Qt project.

For many months, Ahmad has produced a consistent flow of good contributions and 
reviews to Qt:

Changes owned:
* https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/owner:a.samirh78%2540gmail.com

Changes commented/voted on:
* 
https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/commentby:a.samirh78%2540gmail.com+-owner:a.samirh78%2540gmail.com


Cheers,
Volker

--
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
-- 
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development


Re: [Development] Nominating for approver: commentby vs reviewedby vs reviewer search operators

2023-08-15 Thread Mårten Nordheim via Development
Hey!

Yeah, I think reviewer: is sometimes a bit misleading, so +1 for changing to 
commentby:
Though, in that case we might want to also, for transparency, add 
"-owner:". It's only natural
to reply on your own changes of course :)


Mårten


From: Development  on behalf of Volker 
Hilsheimer via Development 
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2023 16:47
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: [Development] Nominating for approver: commentby vs reviewedby vs 
reviewer search operators

Hi,

Emails in which we nominate contributors for Approver status usually have two 
queries: the list of changes owned [1], and the list of changes that the 
nominee reviewed [2].

[1] https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/owner:volker.hilsheimer%2540qt.io
[2] https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/reviewer:volker.hilsheimer%2540qt.io

The first query should be pretty clear: all changes I owned, which is usually 
all changes I authored.

However, the second query selects all changes on which I was added as a 
reviewer, no matter whether I actually provided any input. So the list produced 
by [2] includes

https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtdeclarative/+/496546

even though I didn’t provide any input to this change.

Being added as a reviewer by other contributors is a sign of trust. However, 
for the sake of evaluating a nomination, perhaps we want to get an idea of how 
much someone actually participated in code reviews.

Gerrit provides two selectors to get a list of changes where someone actually 
participated: reviewedby [3] and commentby [4]:

[3] https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/reviewedby:volker.hilsheimer%2540qt.io
[4] https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/commentby:volker.hilsheimer%2540qt.io

The former lists all the changes for which I voted on any of the patch sets (it 
doesn’t have to be the patch set that ultimately got merged). The latter lists 
all changes where I made a comment. The list produced by [3] doesn’t include 
https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/489071 (even though I 
commented), while the list produced by [4] does.

Commenting is very valuable, even when not voting. And voting implies 
commenting, e.g. the list from [4] does include 
https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtopcua/+/496329, where I only voted but 
didn’t leave a comment.

Hence, I’d like to propose that nomination emails include the two links as per 
[1] and [4], using `owner` and `commentby` search operators.


Volker

--
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
-- 
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development


Re: [Development] Nominating Konrad Kujawa as approver

2023-05-24 Thread Mårten Nordheim via Development
+1 :)

Also same team

Mårten


From: Development  on behalf of Ievgenii 
Meshcheriakov via Development 
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2023 12:56
To: Qt development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Development] Nominating Konrad Kujawa as approver

+1, disclaimer: same team.

From: Development  on behalf of Alexey 
Edelev via Development 
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2023 12:30
To: Qt development mailing list 
Subject: [Development] Nominating Konrad Kujawa as approver

Hello everyone,

I would like to nominate Konrad Kujawa for approver rights in the Qt project.

Konrad is a member of the Qt Core team, and has been mainly working on
QtGrpc among other contributions to qtbase, qthttpserver, qtdeclarative and
other repos.

You can see his merged changes here:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/owner:konrad.kujawa%2540qt.io+is:merged

and his reviews here:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/reviewer:konrad.kujawa%2540qt.io


Alexey Edelev

Software Engineer

Qt Group
Erich-Thilo-Str. 10 12489
Berlin, Germany

alexey.ede...@qt.io

www.qt.io

[https://s3.eu-north-1.amazonaws.com/email-signature-tool-leroy/Qt-Group-logo-black-1.png]
[https://s3.eu-north-1.amazonaws.com/email-signature-tool-leroy/facebook-x2-right.png]

[https://s3.eu-north-1.amazonaws.com/email-signature-tool-leroy/twitter-x2.png] 
 
[https://s3.eu-north-1.amazonaws.com/email-signature-tool-leroy/linkedin-x2.png]
 
[https://s3.eu-north-1.amazonaws.com/email-signature-tool-leroy/youtube-x2.png] 

-- 
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development


Re: [Development] Nominating Tatiana Borisova as approver

2023-05-23 Thread Mårten Nordheim via Development
Hey!

+1, and disclaimer that we're both same team.

Mårten


From: Development  on behalf of Alexey 
Edelev via Development 
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2023 15:39
To: Qt development mailing list
Subject: [Development] Nominating Tatiana Borisova as approver

Hello everyone,

I would like to nominate Tatiana Borisova for approver rights in the Qt project.

Tatiana has been contributing to the Qt Project as a TQtC employee
since 2021, where most of her work went towards to our INTEGRITY support.

She recently joined the Qt Core team,
and has been mainly working on QtGrpc among other contributions
to qtbase, qtdeclarative, and other modules.

You can see her merged changes here:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/owner:tatiana.borisova%2540qt.io+is:merged

and her reviews here:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/reviewer:tatiana.borisova%2540qt.io


Alexey Edelev

Software Engineer

Qt Group
Erich-Thilo-Str. 10 12489
Berlin, Germany

alexey.ede...@qt.io

www.qt.io

[https://s3.eu-north-1.amazonaws.com/email-signature-tool-leroy/Qt-Group-logo-black-1.png]
[https://s3.eu-north-1.amazonaws.com/email-signature-tool-leroy/facebook-x2-right.png]

[https://s3.eu-north-1.amazonaws.com/email-signature-tool-leroy/twitter-x2.png] 
 
[https://s3.eu-north-1.amazonaws.com/email-signature-tool-leroy/linkedin-x2.png]
 
[https://s3.eu-north-1.amazonaws.com/email-signature-tool-leroy/youtube-x2.png] 

-- 
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development


Re: [Development] Proposing changes to https://wiki.qt.io/Qt_Coding_Style

2023-05-09 Thread Mårten Nordheim via Development
Hello!

> -Original Message-
> From: Development  On Behalf Of
> Marc Mutz via Development
> Sent: tirsdag 9. mai 2023 08:52
> To: qt-dev 
> Subject: [Development] Proposing changes to
> https://wiki.qt.io/Qt_Coding_Style
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'd like to propose the following clarifications:
> 
> - no space between "operator" and it's symbol:
> 
>  [...]
> 
> - exactly one space each between if and constexpr/constinit and
> following [({]:
>  [...]

Yeah, I'd +1 these.

> - space after template and before <:
> 
>// WRONG
>template
>// CORRECT:
>template 
> 
> Rationale: We always used the latter in Qt. Then a faulty _clang-format
> that dropped the space for unknown reasons was added to qt5.git and
> since then, we have a wild mix. We should fix the faulty _clang-format
> file and codify just one variant in the normative document,
> https://wiki.qt.io/Qt_Coding_Style.

I think it was already mixed usage back then, but it's also something
I've been bothered by. I pushed this patch a while ago but never
got around to pinging anyone about it:

https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qt5/+/433720

> - drop the requirement for () in lambdas
> 
> Rationale: this was a word-around for older MSVCs. The standard doesn't
> require the empty parameter list (except when adorning the lambda with
> noexcept etc, and then the compiler complains) and people have voted
> with their feet: we now have many uses of [] {} in Qt already.

I don't really see the problem with having empty parenthesis, even if
they're optional. But as long as we're not enforcing it it doesn't make
sense as a rule either.

Mårten 

-- 
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development


Re: [Development] Nominating Edward Welbourne as QLocale / date/time maintainer

2023-05-04 Thread Mårten Nordheim via Development
+1 :)

Mårten

> -Original Message-
> From: Development  On Behalf Of
> Marc Mutz via Development
> Sent: torsdag 4. mai 2023 12:10
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: [Development] Nominating Edward Welbourne as QLocale /
> date/time maintainer
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'd like to nominate Eddy as the maintainer for the QLocale and
> src/corelib/time QtCore subsystems. Eddy is filling that role de-facto
> already; making it de-jure sounds only logical.
> 
> I asked, and he'd be on board, if we'd have him.
> 
> Anyone else in favour? (I'm not sure I have a vote, actually...)
> 
> Thanks,
> Marc
> 
> --
> Marc Mutz 
> Principal Software Engineer
> 
> The Qt Company
> Erich-Thilo-Str. 10 12489
> Berlin, Germany
> www.qt.io
> 
> Geschäftsführer: Mika Pälsi, Juha Varelius, Jouni Lintunen
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin,
> Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg,
> HRB 144331 B
> --
> Development mailing list
> Development@qt-project.org
> https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
-- 
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development


Re: [Development] Template-meta-programming do's and don'ts

2023-05-02 Thread Mårten Nordheim via Development
I think 'yes' is an easy answer. Having a convention that matches the
is_same/is_same_v enable_if/enable_if_t paradigm could make some things
easier, avoiding the need to wrap constexpr bool values in bool_constant
when there is no non-'_v' version of the check yet.
But someone also has to write something that can be agreed upon, and
then it needs to be enforced as well.


Mårten

> -Original Message-
> From: Development  On Behalf Of
> Volker Hilsheimer via Development
> Sent: tirsdag 2. mai 2023 11:00
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: [Development] Template-meta-programming do's and don'ts
> 
> During header review we identified a few cases where e.g. using
> std::conjunction/disjunction wasn’t used, or not used optimally. Using
> suboptimal constructs can result in significant compile-time penalties.
> 
> We generally don’t have a lot of guidelines for template-meta-programming.
> Should we have some?
> 
> 
> Volker
> 
> --
> Development mailing list
> Development@qt-project.org
> https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
-- 
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development


[Development] Reminder to check up on your cherry-picks

2023-03-10 Thread Mårten Nordheim via Development
Do you have some cherry-picks created from your patches that are waiting for an 
action, or failed to integrate?

Patches where you were the original author:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/owner:cherrypick_bot%2540qt-project.org+(author:self)+-status:merged+-status:abandoned

Patches where you were the original author _or_ you are marked as a reviewer:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/owner:cherrypick_bot%2540qt-project.org+(reviewer:self+OR+author:self)+-status:merged+-status:abandoned

Note that when shepherding cherry-picks, try to do it in a descending order, 
i.e. 6.5 goes before 6.5.0, which goes before 6.4, then 6.4.3 etc.
That way, if something were to be missed, we don't end up in a situation where 
we release 6.5.0 with a fix and for 6.5.1 it is gone.


Thanks,
Mårten
-- 
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development


Re: [Development] Nominating Axel Spoerl as approver

2022-12-05 Thread Mårten Nordheim via Development
+1

> -Original Message-
> From: Development  On Behalf Of
> Volker Hilsheimer via Development
> Sent: mandag 5. desember 2022 10:57
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: [Development] Nominating Axel Spoerl as approver
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 
> I’d like to nominate Axel Spoerl as an approver for the Qt project.
> 
> Axel has been working in The Qt Company since January, writing tests,
> analysing and fixing bugs, participating in the port of Qt Speech to Qt 6,
> investigating and stabilising flaky tests across all platforms, and most 
> recently
> implementing platform theme support for GTK3-based Linux desktop
> environments.
> 
> I trust him to be a good approver. Links to gerrit dashboards:
> 
> Patches: https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/owner:axel.spoerl%2540qt.io
> Reviews: https://codereview.qt-
> project.org/q/reviewer:axel.spoerl%2540qt.io
> 
> Disclosure: I’m Axel’s indirect line manager at The Qt Company in Oslo.
> 
> 
> Volker
> 
> ___
> Development mailing list
> Development@qt-project.org
> https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development


Re: [Development] Nominating Mårten Nordheim and Timur Pocheptsov as new co-maintainers of Qt WebSocket

2022-11-29 Thread Mårten Nordheim via Development
Hey!

I can confirm I was CC'd and did not receive any reply either.

Mårten

> -Original Message-
> From: Development  On Behalf Of
> Volker Hilsheimer via Development
> Sent: tirsdag 29. november 2022 14:55
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: [Development] Nominating Mårten Nordheim and Timur Pocheptsov
> as new co-maintainers of Qt WebSocket
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 
> Kurt Pattyn is currently listed as the Maintainer fo Qt WebSocket. However,
> he has not responded to emails I sent him over the last few months. In the
> middle of October I informed him that I will remove him as maintainer and
> nominate someone else unless I get a response. I cc’ed Mårten Nordheim in
> that email. Since I have not received any answer to that email either, I am
> now going to remove Kurt from the list of maintainers.
> 
> And I’d like to nominate Mårten Nordheim and Timur Pocheptsov as co-
> maintainers. I’ve confirmed with them, and they would be ok with extending
> their existing co-maintainership of Qt Network to that module as well.
> 
> 
> Volker
> 
> ___
> Development mailing list
> Development@qt-project.org
> https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development


Re: [Development] Request for new module, qt/qtgrpc

2022-10-06 Thread Mårten Nordheim via Development
Yeah, that's fine since it's what the code is originally based on. I should've 
mentioned :)

Mårten



From: Volker Hilsheimer 
Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2022 6:00:08 PM
To: Mårten Nordheim ; development@qt-project.org 

Subject: Re: [Development] Request for new module, qt/qtgrpc

+1

FWIW, searching for “qtgrpc” hits 
https://semlanik.github.io/qtprotobuf/group__QtGrpc.html, which is generated 
from the sources in https://github.com/semlanik/qtprotobuf - which the readme 
file documents as “on hold”.


Volker


> On 5 Oct 2022, at 12:51, Mårten Nordheim via Development 
>  wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> As part of an ongoing effort, I'd like to request a new module, 'QtGrpc', 
> under the 'qt/' space.
> It is meant to provide protobuf and gRPC support, with a generator extension 
> to generate
> code which uses Qt code directly.
>
> It will initially be Tech Preview.
>
> Responsible person: Alex Blasche
>
>
> Regards,
> Mårten Nordheim
> ___
> Development mailing list
> Development@qt-project.org
> https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development

___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development


[Development] Request for new module, qt/qtgrpc

2022-10-05 Thread Mårten Nordheim via Development
Hello all,

As part of an ongoing effort, I'd like to request a new module, 'QtGrpc', under 
the 'qt/' space.
It is meant to provide protobuf and gRPC support, with a generator extension to 
generate
code which uses Qt code directly. 

It will initially be Tech Preview.

Responsible person: Alex Blasche


Regards,
Mårten Nordheim
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development