Re: [Development] FW: Alpha 2 this week or skip it

2012-06-11 Thread techabc
qt3d successful comipled by msvc11 when I insert
#include functional
to the \qt5\qt3d\3rdparty\assimp\code\AssimpPCH.h
ahead of all other #include .


2012/6/11 Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org:
 On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 12:07 PM, techabc tech...@gmail.com wrote:
 yes, thing get well in my another project.

 Could you please clarify the error output again after including functional ?

 Best Regards,
 Laszlo Papp
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development


Re: [Development] FW: Alpha 2 this week or skip it

2012-06-10 Thread Thiago Macieira
On domingo, 10 de junho de 2012 07.32.54, techabc wrote:
 vs2010 is OK, but vs2012 RC failed, I just want to try win32-msvc11

Please post the 2012 RC build errors and fixes.

--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
 Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
 Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development


Re: [Development] FW: Alpha 2 this week or skip it

2012-06-10 Thread techabc
http://releases.qt-project.org/qt5.0/beta-snapshots/2012-06-09_07-01-09/
qt3d compile failted by visual studio 2012 RC:

   D:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 11.0\VC\BIN\nmake.exe -f Make
file.Release

Microsoft (R) Program Maintenance Utility Version 11.00.50522.1
Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation.  All rights reserved.

   cl -c -nologo -Zm200 -Zc:wchar_t -O2 -MD -EHsc -W3 -w34100 -w34189 -GR -
DQT_SHARED -DUNICODE -DWIN32 -DQT_LARGEFILE_SUPPORT -DQT_COMPILER_SUPPORTS_SSE2
-DQT_MAKEDLL -DQT_NO_CAST_TO_ASCII -DQT_ASCII_CAST_WARNINGS -DQT_MOC_COMPAT -DQT
_USE_QSTRINGBUILDER -DQT_DEPRECATED_WARNINGS -D_USE_MATH_DEFINES -D_SCL_SECURE_N
O_WARNINGS -D_CRT_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS -DQT_BUILD_QT3D_LIB -DQT_NO_EGL -DQT_DLL -D
QT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_NETWORK_LIB -DQT_GUI_LIB -DQT_CORE_LIB -I..\..\..\qtbase\inclu
de\QtCore\5.0.0 -I..\..\..\qtbase\include\QtCore\5.0.0\QtCore -I..\..\..\qtb
ase\include\QtCore -I..\..\..\qtbase\include\QtGui\5.0.0 -I..\..\..\qtbase\i
nclude\QtGui\5.0.0\QtGui -I..\..\..\qtbase\include\QtGui -I..\..\..\qtbase\i
nclude\QtNetwork -I..\..\..\qtbase\include -I..\..\include\Qt3D\5.0.0 -I..
\..\include\Qt3D\5.0.0\Qt3D -I..\..\include -I..\..\include\Qt3D -I..\..\i
nclude -Itmp\rcc\release_shared -Itmp -I..\private -Iglobal -Ipainting
 -Iarrays -Ieffects -Imaterials -Igeometry -Iviewing -Imath3d -Isc
ene -Iscene_ai -I..\..\3rdparty\assimp -I..\..\3rdparty\assimp\code -I..
\..\3rdparty\assimp\code\BoostWorkaround -I..\..\3rdparty\assimp\include -I.
.\..\3rdparty\assimp\include\Compiler -I..\..\3rdparty\assimp\contrib\ConvertU
TF -I..\..\3rdparty\assimp\contrib\zlib -I..\..\3rdparty\assimp\contrib\irrX
ML -I..\..\3rdparty\assimp\contrib\unzip -Iscene_bezier -Inetwork -Igrap
hicsview -Itextures -Isurfaces -Iapi -Itmp\moc\release_shared -I..\..\
..\qtbase\mkspecs\win32-msvc11 -Fotmp\obj\release_shared\ @C:\Users\cherokee\Ap
pData\Local\Temp\nm7552.tmp
BlenderModifier.cpp
..\..\3rdparty\assimp\code\BlenderModifier.cpp(253) : error C2039: 'bind1st' : i
s not a member of 'std'
..\..\3rdparty\assimp\code\BlenderModifier.cpp(253) : error C2039: 'plus' : is n
ot a member of 'std'
..\..\3rdparty\assimp\code\BlenderModifier.cpp(253) : error C2065: 'plus' : unde
clared identifier
..\..\3rdparty\assimp\code\BlenderModifier.cpp(253) : error C2062: type 'unsigne
d int' unexpected
..\..\3rdparty\assimp\code\BlenderModifier.cpp(253) : error C3861: 'bind1st': id
entifier not found
JoinVerticesProcess.cpp
d:\qt5\qt3d\3rdparty\assimp\code\Vertex.h(259) : error C2039: 'plus' : is not a
member of 'std'
d:\qt5\qt3d\3rdparty\assimp\code\Vertex.h(259) : error C2065: 'plus' : undeclare
d identifier
d:\qt5\qt3d\3rdparty\assimp\code\Vertex.h(259) : error C2974: 'Assimp::Vertex::B
inaryOp' : invalid template argument for 'op', type expected
   d:\qt5\qt3d\3rdparty\assimp\code\Vertex.h(227) : see declaration of 'Ass
imp::Vertex::BinaryOp'
   d:\qt5\qt3d\3rdparty\assimp\code\Vertex.h(207) : see declaration of 'Ass
imp::Vertex::BinaryOp'
   d:\qt5\qt3d\3rdparty\assimp\code\Vertex.h(187) : see declaration of 'Ass
imp::Vertex::BinaryOp'
d:\qt5\qt3d\3rdparty\assimp\code\Vertex.h(263) : error C2039: 'minus' : is not a
 member of 'std'
d:\qt5\qt3d\3rdparty\assimp\code\Vertex.h(263) : error C2065: 'minus' : undeclar
ed identifier
d:\qt5\qt3d\3rdparty\assimp\code\Vertex.h(263) : error C2974: 'Assimp::Vertex::B
inaryOp' : invalid template argument for 'op', type expected
   d:\qt5\qt3d\3rdparty\assimp\code\Vertex.h(227) : see declaration of 'Ass
imp::Vertex::BinaryOp'
   d:\qt5\qt3d\3rdparty\assimp\code\Vertex.h(207) : see declaration of 'Ass
imp::Vertex::BinaryOp'
   d:\qt5\qt3d\3rdparty\assimp\code\Vertex.h(187) : see declaration of 'Ass
imp::Vertex::BinaryOp'
LWOAnimation.cpp
..\..\3rdparty\assimp\code\LWOAnimation.cpp(159) : error C2039: 'bind1st' : is n
ot a member of 'std'
..\..\3rdparty\assimp\code\LWOAnimation.cpp(159) : error C2039: 'greater' : is n
ot a member of 'std'
..\..\3rdparty\assimp\code\LWOAnimation.cpp(159) : error C2065: 'greater' : unde
clared identifier
..\..\3rdparty\assimp\code\LWOAnimation.cpp(159) : error C2062: type 'double' un
expected
..\..\3rdparty\assimp\code\LWOAnimation.cpp(159) : error C3861: 'bind1st': ident
ifier not found
..\..\3rdparty\assimp\code\LWOAnimation.cpp(177) : error C2065: 'm' : undeclared
 identifier
..\..\3rdparty\assimp\code\LWOAnimation.cpp(178) : error C2065: 'm' : undeclared
 identifier
..\..\3rdparty\assimp\code\LWOAnimation.cpp(181) : error C2065: 'm' : undeclared
 identifier
..\..\3rdparty\assimp\code\LWOAnimation.cpp(189) : error C2065: 'm' : undeclared
 identifier
..\..\3rdparty\assimp\code\LWOAnimation.cpp(190) : error C2065: 'm' : undeclared
 identifier
Subdivision.cpp
d:\qt5\qt3d\3rdparty\assimp\code\Vertex.h(259) : error C2039: 'plus' : is not a
member of 'std'
d:\qt5\qt3d\3rdparty\assimp\code\Vertex.h(259) : error C2065: 'plus' : undeclare
d identifier
d:\qt5\qt3d\3rdparty\assimp\code\Vertex.h(259) : error C2974: 'Assimp::Vertex::B
inaryOp' 

Re: [Development] FW: Alpha 2 this week or skip it

2012-06-10 Thread Thiago Macieira
On domingo, 10 de junho de 2012 16.12.05, techabc wrote:
 http://releases.qt-project.org/qt5.0/beta-snapshots/2012-06-09_07-01-09/
 qt3d compile failted by visual studio 2012 RC:

Looks like missing includes. Can you provide a patch with the necessary ones?

--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
 Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
 Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development


Re: [Development] FW: Alpha 2 this week or skip it

2012-06-10 Thread techabc
sorry, I can't fix it by a patch.
According http://forums.create.msdn.com/forums/p/95589/571215.aspx
I have added
#include functional
to fixed the same error in another none qt project, but I don't know
how to fix it in qt throw a patch.

2012/6/10 Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com:
 On domingo, 10 de junho de 2012 16.12.05, techabc wrote:
 http://releases.qt-project.org/qt5.0/beta-snapshots/2012-06-09_07-01-09/
 qt3d compile failted by visual studio 2012 RC:

 Looks like missing includes. Can you provide a patch with the necessary ones?

 --
 Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
     Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
     Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden

 ___
 Development mailing list
 Development@qt-project.org
 http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development


Re: [Development] FW: Alpha 2 this week or skip it

2012-06-10 Thread Thiago Macieira
On domingo, 10 de junho de 2012 16.24.34, techabc wrote:
 sorry, I can't fix it by a patch.
 According http://forums.create.msdn.com/forums/p/95589/571215.aspx
 I have added
 #include functional
 to fixed the same error in another none qt project, but I don't know
 how to fix it in qt throw a patch.

Are you saying that adding this include is not enough?

--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
 Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
 Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development


Re: [Development] FW: Alpha 2 this week or skip it

2012-06-10 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 12:07 PM, techabc tech...@gmail.com wrote:
 yes, thing get well in my another project.

Could you please clarify the error output again after including functional ?

Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development


Re: [Development] FW: Alpha 2 this week or skip it

2012-06-09 Thread techabc
vs2010 is OK, but vs2012 RC failed, I just want to try win32-msvc11.

2012/6/10 Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com:
 On domingo, 10 de junho de 2012 01.53.10, techabc wrote:
 It seems that no more alpha 2 comes to the world.
 I wish upcoming beta would full pass compile of Visual Studio 2010 RC.

 What do you mean by 2010 RC? Why don't you use the released version?

 I compiled with VS 2010 and it worked fine.

 --
 Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
     Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
     Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden

 ___
 Development mailing list
 Development@qt-project.org
 http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development


Re: [Development] FW: Alpha 2 this week or skip it

2012-06-02 Thread marius.storm-olsen
It's not wrong and it doesn't really matter. Once MSVC starts to differ from 
the VC version, in the sense that they are not connected, then we can discuss 
changing them.

For now, let's not make Qt 5 more incompatible with Qt 4. It's not worth it, 
just to be pedantic. :-)

--
Sent from my Nokia N9

On 6/2/12 2:14 ext Loaden wrote:
If it realy wrong, we should rename win32-msvc2010 - win32-msvc10, msvc2008 - 
win32-msvc9 ...


2012/6/1 Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com

Right. We've been doing it wrong all along, then: our mkspecs say msvc which
is the compiler, but give the year as the complement.

Maybe we should then start correcting this by keeping msvc11.




-- 

Please don't ask where I come from, It's a shame!
Best Regards
Yuchen
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development


Re: [Development] FW: Alpha 2 this week or skip it

2012-06-01 Thread Iikka Eklund




On 31.5.2012 18.00, Thiago Macieirathiago.macie...@intel.com  wrote:


On quinta-feira, 31 de maio de 2012 13.48.42, simo.f...@nokia.com wrote:

What kind of src packages people are looking for? There  was some
discussion earlier about tarring each submodule separately, but somehow
I
got the impression that eventually wasn't the one people wanted. Did I
miss something?

Every single packager wants the split packages. That should be the
official
format for source distribution.

That's how we are doing it at the moment. Separate installable src package
for each submodule. Our CI already produces these submodule src packages
and right now we are writing configurations  templates for the SDK
installer.

The same applies for the binary packages as well, this is under work.

- iikka


--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
 Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
 Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development



--
Br,
Mr. Iikka Eklund
Senior software engineer

Elektronikkatie 10
FI-90590 Oulu
Email: iikka.ekl...@digia.com

Visit us at: www.digia.com or qt.digia.com
--
PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This message and any attachments are intended only for use by the named
addressee and may contain privileged and/or confidential information. If
you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, copy or take
any action in reliance on it. If you have received this message in
error, please contact the sender immediately and delete the message and
any attachments accompanying it. Digia Plc does not accept liability for
any corruption, interception, amendment, tampering or viruses occurring
to this message.
--

___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development


Re: [Development] FW: Alpha 2 this week or skip it

2012-06-01 Thread techabc
msvc2012 goes RC stage, I think QT 5.0 should support it from now. Itsn't it?

2012/6/1 Iikka Eklund iikka.ekl...@digia.com:


 On 31.5.2012 18.00, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:

 On quinta-feira, 31 de maio de 2012 13.48.42, simo.f...@nokia.com wrote:

 What kind of src packages people are looking for? There  was some
 discussion earlier about tarring each submodule separately, but somehow
 I
 got the impression that eventually wasn't the one people wanted. Did I
 miss something?

 Every single packager wants the split packages. That should be the
 official
 format for source distribution.

 That's how we are doing it at the moment. Separate installable src package
 for each submodule. Our CI already produces these submodule src packages
 and right now we are writing configurations  templates for the SDK
 installer.

 The same applies for the binary packages as well, this is under work.

 - iikka


 --
 Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
 Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
 Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
 ___
 Development mailing list
 Development@qt-project.org
 http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development



 --
 Br,
 Mr. Iikka Eklund
 Senior software engineer

 Elektronikkatie 10
 FI-90590 Oulu
 Email: iikka.ekl...@digia.com

 Visit us at: www.digia.com or qt.digia.com
 --
 PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
 This message and any attachments are intended only for use by the named
 addressee and may contain privileged and/or confidential information. If
 you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, copy or take
 any action in reliance on it. If you have received this message in
 error, please contact the sender immediately and delete the message and
 any attachments accompanying it. Digia Plc does not accept liability for
 any corruption, interception, amendment, tampering or viruses occurring
 to this message.
 --


 ___
 Development mailing list
 Development@qt-project.org
 http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development


Re: [Development] FW: Alpha 2 this week or skip it

2012-06-01 Thread Joerg Bornemann
On 01/06/2012 14:21, ext Joerg Bornemann wrote:

 msvc2012 goes RC stage, I think QT 5.0 should support it from now. Itsn't it?

 There is no such thing as msvc2012.

Allright, I take back everything. MS actually announced the RC of Visual 
Studio 2012 yesterday: 
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudio/archive/2012/05/31/visual-studio-2012-rc-available-now.aspx
This seems to be identical to the formerly announced Visual Studio 11.
Thus support is in Qt. Just use the win32-msvc11 mkspec.


BR,

Jörg
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development


Re: [Development] FW: Alpha 2 this week or skip it

2012-06-01 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sexta-feira, 1 de junho de 2012 14.40.19, Joerg Bornemann wrote:
 On 01/06/2012 14:21, ext Joerg Bornemann wrote:
  msvc2012 goes RC stage, I think QT 5.0 should support it from now. Itsn't
  it?
  There is no such thing as msvc2012.

 Allright, I take back everything. MS actually announced the RC of Visual
 Studio 2012 yesterday:
 http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudio/archive/2012/05/31/visual-studio-2012-r
 c-available-now.aspx This seems to be identical to the formerly announced
 Visual Studio 11. Thus support is in Qt. Just use the win32-msvc11 mkspec.

We should rename the mkspec.

The version is 11.0, but the marketing name is 2012. And the internal _MSC_VER
is probably around 1700 already :-)

--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
 Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
 Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development


Re: [Development] FW: Alpha 2 this week or skip it

2012-06-01 Thread Joerg Bornemann
On 01/06/2012 15:30, ext Thiago Macieira wrote:

 Allright, I take back everything. MS actually announced the RC of Visual
 Studio 2012 yesterday:
 http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudio/archive/2012/05/31/visual-studio-2012-r
 c-available-now.aspx This seems to be identical to the formerly announced
 Visual Studio 11. Thus support is in Qt. Just use the win32-msvc11 mkspec.

 We should rename the mkspec.

I agree...if that's really the final product name. ;-)



Cheers,

Jörg
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development


Re: [Development] FW: Alpha 2 this week or skip it

2012-06-01 Thread Matt Williams
On 1 June 2012 15:54, Joerg Bornemann joerg.bornem...@nokia.com wrote:
 On 01/06/2012 15:30, ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
 Allright, I take back everything. MS actually announced the RC of Visual
 Studio 2012 yesterday:
 http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudio/archive/2012/05/31/visual-studio-2012-r
 c-available-now.aspx This seems to be identical to the formerly announced
 Visual Studio 11. Thus support is in Qt. Just use the win32-msvc11 mkspec.

 We should rename the mkspec.

 I agree...if that's really the final product name. ;-)

Don't forget that the Microsoft Visual Studio and Microsoft Visual
C(++) version number don't have to match. The Visual Studio number
are generally years (recently: 2005, 2008, 2010 and now 2012) while
Visual C(++) is numbered more normally (respectively: 8.0, 9.0 10.0
and now probably 11.0). So the new one could be Visual Studio 2012
with Visual C++ compiler 11.0. Also, in future Microsoft are planning
decoupling the IDE from the compiler so we should keep the mkspec
following the compiler I guess.

-- 
Matt Williams
http://milliams.com
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development


Re: [Development] FW: Alpha 2 this week or skip it

2012-06-01 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sexta-feira, 1 de junho de 2012 16.11.33, Matt Williams wrote:
 On 1 June 2012 15:54, Joerg Bornemann joerg.bornem...@nokia.com wrote:
  On 01/06/2012 15:30, ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
  Allright, I take back everything. MS actually announced the RC of Visual
  Studio 2012 yesterday:
  http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudio/archive/2012/05/31/visual-studio-20
  12-r c-available-now.aspx This seems to be identical to the formerly
  announced Visual Studio 11. Thus support is in Qt. Just use the
  win32-msvc11 mkspec.
  We should rename the mkspec.
 
  I agree...if that's really the final product name. ;-)

 Don't forget that the Microsoft Visual Studio and Microsoft Visual
 C(++) version number don't have to match. The Visual Studio number
 are generally years (recently: 2005, 2008, 2010 and now 2012) while
 Visual C(++) is numbered more normally (respectively: 8.0, 9.0 10.0
 and now probably 11.0). So the new one could be Visual Studio 2012
 with Visual C++ compiler 11.0. Also, in future Microsoft are planning
 decoupling the IDE from the compiler so we should keep the mkspec
 following the compiler I guess.

Right. We've been doing it wrong all along, then: our mkspecs say msvc which
is the compiler, but give the year as the complement.

Maybe we should then start correcting this by keeping msvc11.

--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
 Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
 Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development


Re: [Development] FW: Alpha 2 this week or skip it

2012-06-01 Thread techabc
nice thing: the latest source package already have win32-msvc11 mkspec.
btw, Is there would win32-clang appears?

2012/6/1 Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com:
 On sexta-feira, 1 de junho de 2012 16.11.33, Matt Williams wrote:
 On 1 June 2012 15:54, Joerg Bornemann joerg.bornem...@nokia.com wrote:
  On 01/06/2012 15:30, ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
  Allright, I take back everything. MS actually announced the RC of Visual
  Studio 2012 yesterday:
  http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudio/archive/2012/05/31/visual-studio-20
  12-r c-available-now.aspx This seems to be identical to the formerly
  announced Visual Studio 11. Thus support is in Qt. Just use the
  win32-msvc11 mkspec.
  We should rename the mkspec.
 
  I agree...if that's really the final product name. ;-)

 Don't forget that the Microsoft Visual Studio and Microsoft Visual
 C(++) version number don't have to match. The Visual Studio number
 are generally years (recently: 2005, 2008, 2010 and now 2012) while
 Visual C(++) is numbered more normally (respectively: 8.0, 9.0 10.0
 and now probably 11.0). So the new one could be Visual Studio 2012
 with Visual C++ compiler 11.0. Also, in future Microsoft are planning
 decoupling the IDE from the compiler so we should keep the mkspec
 following the compiler I guess.

 Right. We've been doing it wrong all along, then: our mkspecs say msvc which
 is the compiler, but give the year as the complement.

 Maybe we should then start correcting this by keeping msvc11.

 --
 Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
     Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
     Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden

 ___
 Development mailing list
 Development@qt-project.org
 http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development


Re: [Development] FW: Alpha 2 this week or skip it

2012-06-01 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sábado, 2 de junho de 2012 00.18.48, techabc wrote:
 btw, Is there would win32-clang appears?

That sentence did not make sense. I'm assuming you meant to ask is there a
chance a win32-clang option would appear?

Yes, there's a chance. Contribute the mkspec that works for you and we'll add
it.

--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
 Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
 Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development


Re: [Development] FW: Alpha 2 this week or skip it

2012-06-01 Thread Stephen Chu
On 6/1/12 12:46 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
 On sábado, 2 de junho de 2012 00.18.48, techabc wrote:
 btw, Is there would win32-clang appears?

 That sentence did not make sense. I'm assuming you meant to ask is there a
 chance a win32-clang option would appear?

 Yes, there's a chance. Contribute the mkspec that works for you and we'll add
 it.

This is kind of OT but is there even a working Win32 clang compiler? 
Last time I hear they are still have problem with MFC and other MS headers.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development


Re: [Development] FW: Alpha 2 this week or skip it

2012-06-01 Thread Loaden
If it realy wrong, we should rename win32-msvc2010 - win32-msvc10,
msvc2008 - win32-msvc9 ...

2012/6/1 Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com

 Right. We've been doing it wrong all along, then: our mkspecs say msvc
 which
 is the compiler, but give the year as the complement.

 Maybe we should then start correcting this by keeping msvc11.




-- 
Please don't ask where I come from, It's a shame!
Best Regards
Yuchen
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development