Re: [Development] Testability Driver

[Turunen Tuukka]

> Harri Porten  kirjoitti 28.5.2015 kello 18.28:
> 
>> On Thu, 28 May 2015, Cristian Adam wrote:
>> 
>> Does anyone know what happened with the Testablity Driver?
> 
> I can only confirm what Gerry said: it couldn't keep up with the speed of 
> Qt development.
> 

Exactly. The Qt QA systems still use TDriver for release test automation of Qt 
4.8. In Qt 5 it is replaced by Squish. 

Yours,

Tuukka

> For our own tool Squish we are also kept busy constantly with advances not 
> only in QML but especially hybrid solutions that mix in HTML content or 
> QWidgets (or vice versa)... :}
> 
> For anyone wishing to express their UI tests in an easily readable and 
> non-tool-specific way I suggest to take a look at the Gherkin syntax btw. 
> We just added support this kind of behavior-driven testing:
> 
>  http://doc.froglogic.com/squish/6.0.0/bdd-tutorial-implementation.html
> 
> Harri.
> 
> ___
> Development mailing list
> Development@qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Re: [Development] Testability Driver

[Harri Porten]

On Thu, 28 May 2015, Cristian Adam wrote:

> Does anyone know what happened with the Testablity Driver?

I can only confirm what Gerry said: it couldn't keep up with the speed of 
Qt development.

For our own tool Squish we are also kept busy constantly with advances not 
only in QML but especially hybrid solutions that mix in HTML content or 
QWidgets (or vice versa)... :}

For anyone wishing to express their UI tests in an easily readable and 
non-tool-specific way I suggest to take a look at the Gherkin syntax btw. 
We just added support this kind of behavior-driven testing:

  http://doc.froglogic.com/squish/6.0.0/bdd-tutorial-implementation.html

Harri.

___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Re: [Development] Testability Driver

[Michael Zanetti]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

On 28.05.2015 16:36, Friedemann Kleint wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>> adly we're not using it in Canonical any more. TDriver did a good
>> job
> with Qt4 apps. But it was desired to have a single tool to test
> multiple toolkits (Qt & GTK & Html5) using python, so > >we ended
> up building our own: AutoPilot [1]. IMO TDriver is more powerful
> though.
> 
> Does this mean the code introduced by 
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/66513/ can be removed ? - No
> need to keep dead code?

No, we'd still need that. The "autopilot" driver uses the same
mechanism to be loaded.

Br,
Michael
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1

iEYEARECAAYFAlVnLYAACgkQXJwWsxE5x7hyUACdF5mRG/PgPA7p9j1RJzDy+O7m
7MEAoIsW/ow10TKwdu9/tqKr1EqnIfHC
=wOf8
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Re: [Development] Testability Driver

[Friedemann Kleint]

Hi,

 >adly we're not using it in Canonical any more. TDriver did a good job 
with Qt4 apps. But it was desired to have a single tool to test multiple 
toolkits (Qt & GTK & Html5) using python, so > >we ended up building our 
own: AutoPilot [1]. IMO TDriver is more powerful though.

Does this mean the code introduced by 
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/66513/ can be removed ? - No need 
to keep dead code?

Thanks,
Friedemann

-- 
Friedemann Kleint | The Qt Company

___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Re: [Development] Testability Driver

[Gerry Boland]

On 28/05/15 13:03, Cristian Adam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know what happened with the Testablity Driver?
>
> One can read about TDriver here:
> http://voices.canonical.com/tag/testability%20driver/
>
> It was released by Nokia as LGPL, source code is still available on
> Gitorious: https://www.gitorious.org/tdriver
>
> But that won't be for long since Gitorious has this big fat warning:
> „*System notice*: Gitorious is being acquired by GitLab and
> gitorious.org  will shut down end of May.”
>
> Cheers,
> Cristian.
>
Hey,
sadly we're not using it in Canonical any more. TDriver did a good job with Qt4 
apps. But it was desired to have a single tool to test multiple toolkits (Qt & 
GTK & Html5) using python, so we ended up building our own: AutoPilot [1]. IMO 
TDriver is more powerful though.
-Gerry


[1] http://unity.ubuntu.com/autopilot/index.html
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

[Development] Testability Driver

[Cristian Adam]

Hi,

Does anyone know what happened with the Testablity Driver?

One can read about TDriver here:
http://voices.canonical.com/tag/testability%20driver/

It was released by Nokia as LGPL, source code is still available on
Gitorious: https://www.gitorious.org/tdriver

But that won't be for long since Gitorious has this big fat warning:
„*System notice*: Gitorious is being acquired by GitLab and gitorious.org
will shut down end of May.”

Cheers,
Cristian.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development