Re: [Development] Stable vs dev branch
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Kurt Pattyn pattyn.k...@gmail.com wrote: Can someone explain what should go into the stable branch and what into the dev branch? What about fixed bugs? Hi, see http://qt-project.org/wiki/Branch-Guidelines . For bug fixes depends on both the nature of the bug and the kind of fix you have: - ordinary fixes should go do stable - fixes that require major reworkings etc. to dev - fixes that are release critical (either for a pending release or should trigger an immediate new release) should go to release after coordinating with the releasing/security/etc. teams. Hope this helps, -- Giuseppe D'Angelo ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Stable vs dev branch
On 09 Dec 2013, at 19:10, Giuseppe D'Angelo dange...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Kurt Pattyn pattyn.k...@gmail.com wrote: Can someone explain what should go into the stable branch and what into the dev branch? What about fixed bugs? Hi, see http://qt-project.org/wiki/Branch-Guidelines . For bug fixes depends on both the nature of the bug and the kind of fix you have: - ordinary fixes should go do stable - fixes that require major reworkings etc. to dev - fixes that are release critical (either for a pending release or should trigger an immediate new release) should go to release after coordinating with the releasing/security/etc. teams. Hope this helps, Sure it does. Thanks. ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development