Re: [Development] Stable vs dev branch

2013-12-09 Thread Giuseppe D'Angelo
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Kurt Pattyn pattyn.k...@gmail.com wrote:
 Can someone explain what should go into the stable branch and what into the 
 dev branch?
 What about fixed bugs?

Hi,
see http://qt-project.org/wiki/Branch-Guidelines .

For bug fixes depends on both the nature of the bug and the kind of
fix you have:
- ordinary fixes should go do stable
- fixes that require major reworkings etc. to dev
- fixes that are release critical (either for a pending release or
should trigger an immediate new release) should go to release after
coordinating with the releasing/security/etc. teams.

Hope this helps,
-- 
Giuseppe D'Angelo
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development


Re: [Development] Stable vs dev branch

2013-12-09 Thread Kurt Pattyn

On 09 Dec 2013, at 19:10, Giuseppe D'Angelo dange...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Kurt Pattyn pattyn.k...@gmail.com wrote:
 Can someone explain what should go into the stable branch and what into the 
 dev branch?
 What about fixed bugs?
 
 Hi,
 see http://qt-project.org/wiki/Branch-Guidelines .
 
 For bug fixes depends on both the nature of the bug and the kind of
 fix you have:
 - ordinary fixes should go do stable
 - fixes that require major reworkings etc. to dev
 - fixes that are release critical (either for a pending release or
 should trigger an immediate new release) should go to release after
 coordinating with the releasing/security/etc. teams.
 
 Hope this helps,

Sure it does. Thanks.

___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development