Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: omap4-sdp: add dynamic pin states for uart3/4

2013-07-18 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Grygorii Strashko  [130718 02:01]:
> On 07/18/2013 11:09 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> 
> Don't think it's debug code - IO chain need to be rearmed after each
> PRCM IO IRQ - otherwise IO wakeup events may be lost (at least on
> OMAP4, OMAP5 requires more complex handling(( ).

Nope, only after the mux register changes. I've verified it on
am3730 with off-idle for both serial and wl12xx.
 
> I didn't pick up your padconf patches yet -seems i need to be in sync :)

Well you need those for proper wake-up event support..

> Below the diff I used to verify IO wake up (It follows old IO daisy
> chain hanlding models in hwmod before DT):

..then these changes not needed with the pinctrl-single changes.

Regards,

Tony
___
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss


Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: omap4-sdp: add dynamic pin states for uart3/4

2013-07-18 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Grygorii Strashko  [130717 09:48]:
> Hi,
> 
> On 07/17/2013 06:32 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >* Grygorii Strashko  [130717 04:49]:
> >>Add dynamic "active"/"idle" pin states for uart3/4 which will be applied
> >>when uart3/4 state is switched from active to idle and back by Runtime
> >>PM or during system suspend.
> >
> >This is good for testing code, but should not be merged because
> >omap4 has the iopad wake-ups available for uarts. So those can
> >be always enabled.
> 
> In this case, 2 IRQ will be received per each UART RX event - one from
> PRCM and from UART - and that's not good from PM perspective (It will
> affect on CPUIdle and CPUFreq at least).

Oh I see, that's because I accidentally left the debug code enabled
to make it easier to test the wake-up events without having to
have working off-idle. The wake flags can be kept on always for
sure.

The patch below should sort out the issue of getting wake-up interrupts
during runtime as long as you don't have DEBUG defined.

Regards,

Tony

--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single-omap.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single-omap.c
@@ -140,9 +140,17 @@ static irqreturn_t pcs_omap_handle_irq(int irq, void *data)
if ((val & OMAP_WAKEUP_EVENT_MASK) == OMAP_WAKEUP_EVENT_MASK)
generic_handle_irq(wakeirq);
}
-
+#ifdef DEBUG
+   /*
+* This enables wake-up interrupts during runtime also
+* causing duplicate interrupts. But it also makes debugging
+* the wake-up events easy as deeper idle states often are
+* not working for new devices while the drivers are being
+* developed.
+*/
if (pcso->reconfigure_io_chain)
pcso->reconfigure_io_chain();
+#endif
 
return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
___
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss


Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: omap4-sdp: add dynamic pin states for uart3/4

2013-07-17 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Grygorii Strashko  [130717 04:49]:
> Add dynamic "active"/"idle" pin states for uart3/4 which will be applied
> when uart3/4 state is switched from active to idle and back by Runtime
> PM or during system suspend.

This is good for testing code, but should not be merged because
omap4 has the iopad wake-ups available for uarts. So those can
be always enabled.
 
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4-sdp.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4-sdp.dts
> @@ -181,18 +181,40 @@
>   pinctrl-single,pins = <
>   0x100 (PIN_INPUT_PULLUP | MUX_MODE0)/* 
> uart3_cts_rctx.uart3_cts_rctx */
>   0x102 (PIN_OUTPUT | MUX_MODE0)  /* 
> uart3_rts_sd.uart3_rts_sd */
> - 0x104 (PIN_INPUT | MUX_MODE0)   /* 
> uart3_rx_irrx.uart3_rx_irrx */
>   0x106 (PIN_OUTPUT | MUX_MODE0)  /* 
> uart3_tx_irtx.uart3_tx_irtx */
>   >;
>   };

This just need to become:
pinctrl-single,pins = <
...
0x104 (WAKEUP_EN | PIN_INPUT_MUX_MODE0) /* 
uart3_rx_irrx.uart3_rx_irrx */
...
>;
interrupts = ;
};

And so on. For am33xx you need to remux things to GPIO for the wake-up
events, so you should maybe test on that instead.

Regards,

Tony
___
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss