Re: [RFC 0/2] exynos5250/hdmi: replace dummy hdmiphy clock with pmu reg control

2013-06-18 Thread Kishon Vijay Abraham I
Hi,

On Tuesday 18 June 2013 03:33 PM, Rahul Sharma wrote:
 Thanks all,
 
 On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:39 AM, 김승우 sw0312@samsung.com wrote:
 Hello Kishon,

 On 2013년 06월 13일 21:54, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
 Hi,

 On Thursday 13 June 2013 04:51 PM, Inki Dae wrote:


 -Original Message-
 From: Sylwester Nawrocki [mailto:s.nawro...@samsung.com]
 Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 5:56 PM
 To: Rahul Sharma
 Cc: Rahul Sharma; Inki Dae; linux-samsung-...@vger.kernel.org;
 devicetree-
 disc...@lists.ozlabs.org; DRI mailing list; Kukjin Kim; Seung-Woo Kim;
 Sean Paul; sunil joshi; Kishon Vijay Abraham I; Stephen Warren;
 grant.lik...@linaro.org
 Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] exynos5250/hdmi: replace dummy hdmiphy clock with
 pmu reg control

 Hi,

 On 06/13/2013 06:26 AM, Rahul Sharma wrote:
 Mr. Dae,

 Thanks for your valuable inputs.

 I posted it as RFC because, I also have received comments to register
 hdmiphy as a clock controller. As we always configure it for specific
 frequency, hdmi-phy looks similar to a PLL. But it really doesn't
 belong to that class. Secondly prior to exynos5420, it was a i2c
 device. I am not sure we can register a I2C device as a clock
 controller. I wanted to discuss and explore this option here.

 Have you considered using the generic PHY framework for those HDMI
 PHY devices [1] ? I guess we could add a dedicated group of ops for
 video PHYs, similarly as is is done with struct v4l2_subdev_ops. For
 configuring things like the carrier/pixel clock frequency or anything
 what's common across the video PHYs.

 Perhaps you could have a look and see if this framework would be
 useful for HDMI and possibly point out anything what might be missing ?

 I'm not sure it it really solves the issues specific to the Exynos
 HDMI but at least with a generic PHY driver the PHY module would be
 separate from the PHY controller, as often same HDMI DPHY can be used
 with various types of a HDMI controller. So this would allow to not
 duplicate the HDMI PHY drivers in the long-term perspective.

 Yeah, at least, it seems that we could use PHY module to control PMU
 register, HDMI_PHY_CONTROL. However, PHY module provides only init/on/off
 callbacks. As you may know, HDMIPHY needs i2c interfaces to control
 HDMIPHY
 clock. So with PHY module, HDMIPHY driver could enable PMU more
 generically,
 but also has to use existing i2c stuff to control HDMIPHY clock. I had a
 quick review to Generic PHY Framework[v6] but I didn't see that the PHY
 module could generically support more features such as i2c stuff.

 I don't think PHY framework needs to provide i2c interfaces to program
 certain configurations. Instead in one of the callbacks (init/on/off)
 PHY driver can program whatever it wants using any of the interfaces it
 needs. IMO PHY framework should work independent of the interfaces.

 In exnoys hdmi case, i2c interface is not the exact issue. In exynos
 hdmi, hdmiphy should send i2c configuration about video clock
 information as the video mode information including resolution, bit per
 pixel, refresh rate passed from drm subsystem. So init/on/off callbacks
 of phy framework are not enough for exynos hdmiphy and it should have a
 callback to set video mode.

 Do you have plan to add driver specific extend callback pointers to phy
 framework?

 Currently, hdmi directly calls phy operations, but Rahul's another patch
 set, mentioned by Inki, divides hdmi and hdmiphy and hdmi and hdmiphy is
 connected with exynos hdmi own sub driver callback operations.

 IMHO, if phy framework can support extend callback feature, then this
 own sub driver callbacks can be replaced with phy framework at long term
 view.
 
 Extended callbacks are always welcome. I can also use phy device
 private data to pass on private ops like get_pixelclk and set_pixelclk.

I would recommend creating a wrapper to the existing PHY framework
for HDMI PHY. That way, we can have other HDMI phys added
easily. We need to figure out all the ops that might be needed by the
HDMI PHY to be added to the wrapper.
IMO extended callbacks can lead to abuse of the system and should be
used only when absolutely necessary.

Thanks
Kishon
___
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss


Re: [RFC 0/2] exynos5250/hdmi: replace dummy hdmiphy clock with pmu reg control

2013-06-14 Thread 김승우
Hello Kishon,

On 2013년 06월 13일 21:54, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
 Hi,
 
 On Thursday 13 June 2013 04:51 PM, Inki Dae wrote:


 -Original Message-
 From: Sylwester Nawrocki [mailto:s.nawro...@samsung.com]
 Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 5:56 PM
 To: Rahul Sharma
 Cc: Rahul Sharma; Inki Dae; linux-samsung-...@vger.kernel.org;
 devicetree-
 disc...@lists.ozlabs.org; DRI mailing list; Kukjin Kim; Seung-Woo Kim;
 Sean Paul; sunil joshi; Kishon Vijay Abraham I; Stephen Warren;
 grant.lik...@linaro.org
 Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] exynos5250/hdmi: replace dummy hdmiphy clock with
 pmu reg control

 Hi,

 On 06/13/2013 06:26 AM, Rahul Sharma wrote:
 Mr. Dae,

 Thanks for your valuable inputs.

 I posted it as RFC because, I also have received comments to register
 hdmiphy as a clock controller. As we always configure it for specific
 frequency, hdmi-phy looks similar to a PLL. But it really doesn't
 belong to that class. Secondly prior to exynos5420, it was a i2c
 device. I am not sure we can register a I2C device as a clock
 controller. I wanted to discuss and explore this option here.

 Have you considered using the generic PHY framework for those HDMI
 PHY devices [1] ? I guess we could add a dedicated group of ops for
 video PHYs, similarly as is is done with struct v4l2_subdev_ops. For
 configuring things like the carrier/pixel clock frequency or anything
 what's common across the video PHYs.

 Perhaps you could have a look and see if this framework would be
 useful for HDMI and possibly point out anything what might be missing ?

 I'm not sure it it really solves the issues specific to the Exynos
 HDMI but at least with a generic PHY driver the PHY module would be
 separate from the PHY controller, as often same HDMI DPHY can be used
 with various types of a HDMI controller. So this would allow to not
 duplicate the HDMI PHY drivers in the long-term perspective.

 Yeah, at least, it seems that we could use PHY module to control PMU
 register, HDMI_PHY_CONTROL. However, PHY module provides only init/on/off
 callbacks. As you may know, HDMIPHY needs i2c interfaces to control
 HDMIPHY
 clock. So with PHY module, HDMIPHY driver could enable PMU more
 generically,
 but also has to use existing i2c stuff to control HDMIPHY clock. I had a
 quick review to Generic PHY Framework[v6] but I didn't see that the PHY
 module could generically support more features such as i2c stuff.
 
 I don't think PHY framework needs to provide i2c interfaces to program
 certain configurations. Instead in one of the callbacks (init/on/off)
 PHY driver can program whatever it wants using any of the interfaces it
 needs. IMO PHY framework should work independent of the interfaces.

In exnoys hdmi case, i2c interface is not the exact issue. In exynos
hdmi, hdmiphy should send i2c configuration about video clock
information as the video mode information including resolution, bit per
pixel, refresh rate passed from drm subsystem. So init/on/off callbacks
of phy framework are not enough for exynos hdmiphy and it should have a
callback to set video mode.

Do you have plan to add driver specific extend callback pointers to phy
framework?

Currently, hdmi directly calls phy operations, but Rahul's another patch
set, mentioned by Inki, divides hdmi and hdmiphy and hdmi and hdmiphy is
connected with exynos hdmi own sub driver callback operations.

IMHO, if phy framework can support extend callback feature, then this
own sub driver callbacks can be replaced with phy framework at long term
view.

Thanks and Regards,
- Seung-Woo Kim

 
 For example, twl4030 phy driver actually uses i2c to program its
 registers but still it uses the PHY framework [1].
 
 [1] -- http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1729414
 
 Thanks
 Kishon
 -- 
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
 linux-samsung-soc in
 the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
 More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 

-- 
Seung-Woo Kim
Samsung Software RD Center
--

___
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss


Re: [RFC 0/2] exynos5250/hdmi: replace dummy hdmiphy clock with pmu reg control

2013-06-13 Thread Sylwester Nawrocki
Hi,

On 06/13/2013 06:26 AM, Rahul Sharma wrote:
 Mr. Dae,
 
 Thanks for your valuable inputs.
 
 I posted it as RFC because, I also have received comments to register
 hdmiphy as a clock controller. As we always configure it for specific
 frequency, hdmi-phy looks similar to a PLL. But it really doesn't
 belong to that class. Secondly prior to exynos5420, it was a i2c
 device. I am not sure we can register a I2C device as a clock
 controller. I wanted to discuss and explore this option here.

Have you considered using the generic PHY framework for those HDMI 
PHY devices [1] ? I guess we could add a dedicated group of ops for 
video PHYs, similarly as is is done with struct v4l2_subdev_ops. For
configuring things like the carrier/pixel clock frequency or anything 
what's common across the video PHYs.

Perhaps you could have a look and see if this framework would be 
useful for HDMI and possibly point out anything what might be missing ?
 
I'm not sure it it really solves the issues specific to the Exynos 
HDMI but at least with a generic PHY driver the PHY module would be 
separate from the PHY controller, as often same HDMI DPHY can be used 
with various types of a HDMI controller. So this would allow to not 
duplicate the HDMI PHY drivers in the long-term perspective.

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/29/95

Thanks,
Sylwester

 As you said, in parallel, I will align these changes and along with
 drm/exynos: hdmi: move hdmiphy related code to hdmiphy driver
 series and post them.
 
 I hope we should be able to close on one of the above approaches for
 hdmiphy.
 
 regards,
 Rahul Sharma.
 
 On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Inki Dae inki@samsung.com wrote:

 2013/6/12 Inki Dae inki@samsung.com

 Hi Rahul,

 This patch is important to us. Actually, previous hdmi driver had
 controlled hdmiphy HDMI_PHY_CONTROL as if that were a clock but now that
 doesn't exist anymore. So we need to discuss how hdmiphy should be handled.
 I konw that you had already posted hdmiphy relevant patch set, [PATCH 0/4]
 drm/exynos: hdmi: move hdmiphy related code to hdmiphy driver.

 I think we can couple pmu register controlling codes with that patch set
 without RFC. Could you update and post them again? like below,
 [PATCH 0/4] drm/exynos: hdmi: move hdmiphy related code to hdmiphy driver
 + [RFC 0/2] exynos5250/hdmi: replace dummy hdmiphy clock with pmu reg
 control

 And then let's start review :)

 And I think It would be better to move the pmu register controlling codes
 into hdmiphy driver like drivers/usb/phy/phy-samsung-usb2.c driver does.

 Thanks,
 Inki Dae

 2013/6/11 Rahul Sharma rahul.sha...@samsung.com

 Previously, hdmiphy is added as a dummy clock in clock file for
 exynos SoCs. Enable/Disable to this clock, actually toggles the power
 control bit in PMU, instead of controlling the clock gate.

 This RFC adds the support to parse hdmiphy control node which is a child
 node to hdmi, and map the pmu register to toggle the power control bit.

 This is based on drm-next branch in Inki Dae's tree.

 Rahul Sharma (2):
   drm/exynos: replace dummy hdmiphy clock with pmu register control
   ARM/dts: add hdmiphy power control pmu register to hdmi dt node

  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi|6 +++
  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_hdmi.c |   69
 ++
  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/regs-hdmi.h   |4 ++
  3 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

 --
 1.7.10.4

-- 
Sylwester Nawrocki
Samsung RD Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
___
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss


RE: [RFC 0/2] exynos5250/hdmi: replace dummy hdmiphy clock with pmu reg control

2013-06-13 Thread Inki Dae


 -Original Message-
 From: Sylwester Nawrocki [mailto:s.nawro...@samsung.com]
 Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 5:56 PM
 To: Rahul Sharma
 Cc: Rahul Sharma; Inki Dae; linux-samsung-...@vger.kernel.org; devicetree-
 disc...@lists.ozlabs.org; DRI mailing list; Kukjin Kim; Seung-Woo Kim;
 Sean Paul; sunil joshi; Kishon Vijay Abraham I; Stephen Warren;
 grant.lik...@linaro.org
 Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] exynos5250/hdmi: replace dummy hdmiphy clock with
 pmu reg control
 
 Hi,
 
 On 06/13/2013 06:26 AM, Rahul Sharma wrote:
  Mr. Dae,
 
  Thanks for your valuable inputs.
 
  I posted it as RFC because, I also have received comments to register
  hdmiphy as a clock controller. As we always configure it for specific
  frequency, hdmi-phy looks similar to a PLL. But it really doesn't
  belong to that class. Secondly prior to exynos5420, it was a i2c
  device. I am not sure we can register a I2C device as a clock
  controller. I wanted to discuss and explore this option here.
 
 Have you considered using the generic PHY framework for those HDMI
 PHY devices [1] ? I guess we could add a dedicated group of ops for
 video PHYs, similarly as is is done with struct v4l2_subdev_ops. For
 configuring things like the carrier/pixel clock frequency or anything
 what's common across the video PHYs.
 
 Perhaps you could have a look and see if this framework would be
 useful for HDMI and possibly point out anything what might be missing ?
 
 I'm not sure it it really solves the issues specific to the Exynos
 HDMI but at least with a generic PHY driver the PHY module would be
 separate from the PHY controller, as often same HDMI DPHY can be used
 with various types of a HDMI controller. So this would allow to not
 duplicate the HDMI PHY drivers in the long-term perspective.

Yeah, at least, it seems that we could use PHY module to control PMU
register, HDMI_PHY_CONTROL. However, PHY module provides only init/on/off
callbacks. As you may know, HDMIPHY needs i2c interfaces to control HDMIPHY
clock. So with PHY module, HDMIPHY driver could enable PMU more generically,
but also has to use existing i2c stuff to control HDMIPHY clock. I had a
quick review to Generic PHY Framework[v6] but I didn't see that the PHY
module could generically support more features such as i2c stuff.

Thanks,
Inki Dae

 
 [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/29/95
 
 Thanks,
 Sylwester
 
  As you said, in parallel, I will align these changes and along with
  drm/exynos: hdmi: move hdmiphy related code to hdmiphy driver
  series and post them.
 
  I hope we should be able to close on one of the above approaches for
  hdmiphy.
 
  regards,
  Rahul Sharma.
 
  On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Inki Dae inki@samsung.com wrote:
 
  2013/6/12 Inki Dae inki@samsung.com
 
  Hi Rahul,
 
  This patch is important to us. Actually, previous hdmi driver had
  controlled hdmiphy HDMI_PHY_CONTROL as if that were a clock but now
 that
  doesn't exist anymore. So we need to discuss how hdmiphy should be
 handled.
  I konw that you had already posted hdmiphy relevant patch set, [PATCH
 0/4]
  drm/exynos: hdmi: move hdmiphy related code to hdmiphy driver.
 
  I think we can couple pmu register controlling codes with that patch
 set
  without RFC. Could you update and post them again? like below,
  [PATCH 0/4] drm/exynos: hdmi: move hdmiphy related code to hdmiphy
 driver
  + [RFC 0/2] exynos5250/hdmi: replace dummy hdmiphy clock with pmu reg
  control
 
  And then let's start review :)
 
  And I think It would be better to move the pmu register controlling
 codes
  into hdmiphy driver like drivers/usb/phy/phy-samsung-usb2.c driver
does.
 
  Thanks,
  Inki Dae
 
  2013/6/11 Rahul Sharma rahul.sha...@samsung.com
 
  Previously, hdmiphy is added as a dummy clock in clock file for
  exynos SoCs. Enable/Disable to this clock, actually toggles the power
  control bit in PMU, instead of controlling the clock gate.
 
  This RFC adds the support to parse hdmiphy control node which is a
 child
  node to hdmi, and map the pmu register to toggle the power control
 bit.
 
  This is based on drm-next branch in Inki Dae's tree.
 
  Rahul Sharma (2):
drm/exynos: replace dummy hdmiphy clock with pmu register control
ARM/dts: add hdmiphy power control pmu register to hdmi dt node
 
   arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi|6 +++
   drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_hdmi.c |   69
  ++
   drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/regs-hdmi.h   |4 ++
   3 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
 
  --
  1.7.10.4
 
 --
 Sylwester Nawrocki
 Samsung RD Institute Poland
 Samsung Electronics

___
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss


Re: [RFC 0/2] exynos5250/hdmi: replace dummy hdmiphy clock with pmu reg control

2013-06-13 Thread Kishon Vijay Abraham I

Hi,

On Thursday 13 June 2013 04:51 PM, Inki Dae wrote:




-Original Message-
From: Sylwester Nawrocki [mailto:s.nawro...@samsung.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 5:56 PM
To: Rahul Sharma
Cc: Rahul Sharma; Inki Dae; linux-samsung-...@vger.kernel.org; devicetree-
disc...@lists.ozlabs.org; DRI mailing list; Kukjin Kim; Seung-Woo Kim;
Sean Paul; sunil joshi; Kishon Vijay Abraham I; Stephen Warren;
grant.lik...@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] exynos5250/hdmi: replace dummy hdmiphy clock with
pmu reg control

Hi,

On 06/13/2013 06:26 AM, Rahul Sharma wrote:

Mr. Dae,

Thanks for your valuable inputs.

I posted it as RFC because, I also have received comments to register
hdmiphy as a clock controller. As we always configure it for specific
frequency, hdmi-phy looks similar to a PLL. But it really doesn't
belong to that class. Secondly prior to exynos5420, it was a i2c
device. I am not sure we can register a I2C device as a clock
controller. I wanted to discuss and explore this option here.


Have you considered using the generic PHY framework for those HDMI
PHY devices [1] ? I guess we could add a dedicated group of ops for
video PHYs, similarly as is is done with struct v4l2_subdev_ops. For
configuring things like the carrier/pixel clock frequency or anything
what's common across the video PHYs.

Perhaps you could have a look and see if this framework would be
useful for HDMI and possibly point out anything what might be missing ?

I'm not sure it it really solves the issues specific to the Exynos
HDMI but at least with a generic PHY driver the PHY module would be
separate from the PHY controller, as often same HDMI DPHY can be used
with various types of a HDMI controller. So this would allow to not
duplicate the HDMI PHY drivers in the long-term perspective.


Yeah, at least, it seems that we could use PHY module to control PMU
register, HDMI_PHY_CONTROL. However, PHY module provides only init/on/off
callbacks. As you may know, HDMIPHY needs i2c interfaces to control HDMIPHY
clock. So with PHY module, HDMIPHY driver could enable PMU more generically,
but also has to use existing i2c stuff to control HDMIPHY clock. I had a
quick review to Generic PHY Framework[v6] but I didn't see that the PHY
module could generically support more features such as i2c stuff.


I don't think PHY framework needs to provide i2c interfaces to program 
certain configurations. Instead in one of the callbacks (init/on/off) 
PHY driver can program whatever it wants using any of the interfaces it 
needs. IMO PHY framework should work independent of the interfaces.


For example, twl4030 phy driver actually uses i2c to program its 
registers but still it uses the PHY framework [1].


[1] -- http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1729414

Thanks
Kishon
___
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss


Re: [RFC 0/2] exynos5250/hdmi: replace dummy hdmiphy clock with pmu reg control

2013-06-12 Thread Rahul Sharma
Mr. Dae,

Thanks for your valuable inputs.

I posted it as RFC because, I also have received comments to register
hdmiphy as a clock controller. As we always configure it for specific
frequency, hdmi-phy looks similar to a PLL. But it really doesn't
belong to that class. Secondly prior to exynos5420, it was a i2c
device. I am not sure we can register a I2C device as a clock
controller. I wanted to discuss and explore this option here.

As you said, in parallel, I will align these changes and along with
drm/exynos: hdmi: move hdmiphy related code to hdmiphy driver
series and post them.

I hope we should be able to close on one of the above approaches for
hdmiphy.

regards,
Rahul Sharma.

On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Inki Dae inki@samsung.com wrote:



 2013/6/12 Inki Dae inki@samsung.com

 Hi Rahul,

 This patch is important to us. Actually, previous hdmi driver had
 controlled hdmiphy HDMI_PHY_CONTROL as if that were a clock but now that
 doesn't exist anymore. So we need to discuss how hdmiphy should be handled.
 I konw that you had already posted hdmiphy relevant patch set, [PATCH 0/4]
 drm/exynos: hdmi: move hdmiphy related code to hdmiphy driver.

 I think we can couple pmu register controlling codes with that patch set
 without RFC. Could you update and post them again? like below,
 [PATCH 0/4] drm/exynos: hdmi: move hdmiphy related code to hdmiphy driver
 + [RFC 0/2] exynos5250/hdmi: replace dummy hdmiphy clock with pmu reg
 control

 And then let's start review :)


 And I think It would be better to move the pmu register controlling codes
 into hdmiphy driver like drivers/usb/phy/phy-samsung-usb2.c driver does.



 Thanks,
 Inki Dae



 2013/6/11 Rahul Sharma rahul.sha...@samsung.com

 Previously, hdmiphy is added as a dummy clock in clock file for
 exynos SoCs. Enable/Disable to this clock, actually toggles the power
 control bit in PMU, instead of controlling the clock gate.

 This RFC adds the support to parse hdmiphy control node which is a child
 node to hdmi, and map the pmu register to toggle the power control bit.

 This is based on drm-next branch in Inki Dae's tree.

 Rahul Sharma (2):
   drm/exynos: replace dummy hdmiphy clock with pmu register control
   ARM/dts: add hdmiphy power control pmu register to hdmi dt node

  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi|6 +++
  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_hdmi.c |   69
 ++
  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/regs-hdmi.h   |4 ++
  3 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

 --
 1.7.10.4

 --
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
 linux-samsung-soc in
 the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
 More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



___
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss


[RFC 0/2] exynos5250/hdmi: replace dummy hdmiphy clock with pmu reg control

2013-06-11 Thread Rahul Sharma
Previously, hdmiphy is added as a dummy clock in clock file for
exynos SoCs. Enable/Disable to this clock, actually toggles the power
control bit in PMU, instead of controlling the clock gate.

This RFC adds the support to parse hdmiphy control node which is a child
node to hdmi, and map the pmu register to toggle the power control bit.

This is based on drm-next branch in Inki Dae's tree.

Rahul Sharma (2):
  drm/exynos: replace dummy hdmiphy clock with pmu register control
  ARM/dts: add hdmiphy power control pmu register to hdmi dt node

 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi|6 +++
 drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_hdmi.c |   69 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/regs-hdmi.h   |4 ++
 3 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

-- 
1.7.10.4

___
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss


Re: [RFC 0/2] exynos5250/hdmi: replace dummy hdmiphy clock with pmu reg control

2013-06-11 Thread Inki Dae
Hi Rahul,

This patch is important to us. Actually, previous hdmi driver had
controlled hdmiphy HDMI_PHY_CONTROL as if that were a clock but now that
doesn't exist anymore. So we need to discuss how hdmiphy should be handled.
I konw that you had already posted hdmiphy relevant patch set, [PATCH 0/4]
drm/exynos: hdmi: move hdmiphy related code to hdmiphy driver.

I think we can couple pmu register controlling codes with that patch set
without RFC. Could you update and post them again? like below,
[PATCH 0/4] drm/exynos: hdmi: move hdmiphy related code to hdmiphy driver +
[RFC 0/2] exynos5250/hdmi: replace dummy hdmiphy clock with pmu reg control

And then let's start review :)

Thanks,
Inki Dae



2013/6/11 Rahul Sharma rahul.sha...@samsung.com

 Previously, hdmiphy is added as a dummy clock in clock file for
 exynos SoCs. Enable/Disable to this clock, actually toggles the power
 control bit in PMU, instead of controlling the clock gate.

 This RFC adds the support to parse hdmiphy control node which is a child
 node to hdmi, and map the pmu register to toggle the power control bit.

 This is based on drm-next branch in Inki Dae's tree.

 Rahul Sharma (2):
   drm/exynos: replace dummy hdmiphy clock with pmu register control
   ARM/dts: add hdmiphy power control pmu register to hdmi dt node

  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi|6 +++
  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_hdmi.c |   69
 ++
  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/regs-hdmi.h   |4 ++
  3 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

 --
 1.7.10.4

 --
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
 linux-samsung-soc in
 the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
 More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

___
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss


Re: [RFC 0/2] exynos5250/hdmi: replace dummy hdmiphy clock with pmu reg control

2013-06-11 Thread Inki Dae
2013/6/12 Inki Dae inki@samsung.com

 Hi Rahul,

 This patch is important to us. Actually, previous hdmi driver had
 controlled hdmiphy HDMI_PHY_CONTROL as if that were a clock but now that
 doesn't exist anymore. So we need to discuss how hdmiphy should be handled.
 I konw that you had already posted hdmiphy relevant patch set, [PATCH 0/4]
 drm/exynos: hdmi: move hdmiphy related code to hdmiphy driver.

 I think we can couple pmu register controlling codes with that patch set
 without RFC. Could you update and post them again? like below,
 [PATCH 0/4] drm/exynos: hdmi: move hdmiphy related code to hdmiphy driver
 + [RFC 0/2] exynos5250/hdmi: replace dummy hdmiphy clock with pmu reg
 control

 And then let's start review :)


And I think It would be better to move the pmu register controlling codes
into hdmiphy driver like drivers/usb/phy/phy-samsung-usb2.c driver does.



 Thanks,
 Inki Dae



 2013/6/11 Rahul Sharma rahul.sha...@samsung.com

 Previously, hdmiphy is added as a dummy clock in clock file for
 exynos SoCs. Enable/Disable to this clock, actually toggles the power
 control bit in PMU, instead of controlling the clock gate.

 This RFC adds the support to parse hdmiphy control node which is a child
 node to hdmi, and map the pmu register to toggle the power control bit.

 This is based on drm-next branch in Inki Dae's tree.

 Rahul Sharma (2):
   drm/exynos: replace dummy hdmiphy clock with pmu register control
   ARM/dts: add hdmiphy power control pmu register to hdmi dt node

  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi|6 +++
  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_hdmi.c |   69
 ++
  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/regs-hdmi.h   |4 ++
  3 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

 --
 1.7.10.4

 --
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
 linux-samsung-soc in
 the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
 More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



___
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss