[freenet-dev] a670382: Add code for obtaining the USK URI which was used to create the USKRetriever.
re: http://github.com/freenet/fred-staging/commit/bfcd376880641c6eb40 getURI() is used no where but in some log message. It is safe to return any value.
[freenet-dev] Using standard ports of encrypted protocols
On Tuesday, 19. May 2009 07:14:20 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote: >use-the-port-80-443-53-1863-for-comunication>and vote (3 points) for this > idea. I just added the mailbody as comment :) Best wishes, Arne --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- - singing a part of the history of free software - http://infinite-hands.draketo.de -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090519/aba5c06b/attachment.pgp>
[freenet-dev] Usability test results
On Monday, 18. May 2009 15:50:30 Thomas Sachau wrote: > Do you know the numbers of possible browsers? You dont want to add a > useflag for each of them and additionally this would force the user to use > exactly the one browser selected by useflag. Additionally, what happens, > when the selected browser has no privacy mode enabled, while another has > it? This was and still is no real option. > Simple and easy is only the warning page, everyone sees it, everyone can > act as written there. All choices still open and if anyone chooses to act > like an idiot, it is his own problem. I agree, it sounds most reasonable, and it worked for me. Maybe it could be possible to reorder the list of freenet in the wizard / on the warning. Best wishes, Arne --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- - singing a part of the history of free software - http://infinite-hands.draketo.de -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090519/ba8dc915/attachment.pgp>
[freenet-dev] Using standard ports of encrypted protocols
This is a very good idea! Please go here http://freenet.uservoice.c<http://freenet.uservoice.com/pages/8861-general/suggestions/94861-use-the-port-80-443-53-1863-for-comunication> configuration<http://127.0.0.1:8080/forumviewthread.htm?threadid=7453¤tpage=1&boardid=21> om/pages/8861-general/suggestions/94861-use-the-port-80-443-53-1863-for-comunication<http://freenet.uservoice.com/pages/8861-general/suggestions/94861-use-the-port-80-443-53-1863-for-comunication>and vote (3 points) for this idea. On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 12:52 AM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Hi, > > It would be nice, if I could tell freenet to use standard ports for > communication - especially for connections inside a LAN (where the > possibility > that an admin is watching all used ports might be a bit higher than on the > internet). > > I'd think it would be useful to just test a list of ports normally used for > communication (ideally encrypted), so that encrypted data wouldn't draw > suspicions (and so we don't need to implement full steganography at once, > but > can move towards it). > > Maybe the option could include a list with the note "Only select services > you > DON'T want to run!" > > Some ideas, not all encrypted: > > - 2190/UDP TiVoConnect Beacon > - 2593/TCP,UDP RunUO?Ultima Online server > - 3723/TCP,UDP Used by many Battle.net Blizzard games (Diablo II, Warcraft > II, Warcraft III, StarCraft) > - 3724/TCP,UDP World of Warcraft Online gaming MMORPG > - 4000/TCP,UDP Diablo II game > - 6619/TCP,UDP odette-ftps, Odette File Transfer Protocol (OFTP) over > TLS/SSL > - 6891?6900/TCP,UDP Windows Live Messenger (File transfer) > - 6901/TCP,UDP Windows Live Messenger (Voice) > - 28910 Nintendo Wi-Fi Connection > > (all information from > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers > I'm sure there are more...) > > Is tehre any danger in using known ports? > > Best wishes, > Arne > > --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- > - singing a part of the history of free software - > http://infinite-hands.draketo.de > > ___ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090519/0200a1d7/attachment.html>
Re: [freenet-dev] Usability test results
On Monday, 18. May 2009 15:50:30 Thomas Sachau wrote: > Do you know the numbers of possible browsers? You dont want to add a > useflag for each of them and additionally this would force the user to use > exactly the one browser selected by useflag. Additionally, what happens, > when the selected browser has no privacy mode enabled, while another has > it? This was and still is no real option. > Simple and easy is only the warning page, everyone sees it, everyone can > act as written there. All choices still open and if anyone chooses to act > like an idiot, it is his own problem. I agree, it sounds most reasonable, and it worked for me. Maybe it could be possible to reorder the list of freenet in the wizard / on the warning. Best wishes, Arne --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- - singing a part of the history of free software - http://infinite-hands.draketo.de signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
Re: [freenet-dev] Using standard ports of encrypted protocols
On Tuesday, 19. May 2009 07:14:20 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote: >use-the-port-80-443-53-1863-for-comunication>and vote (3 points) for this > idea. I just added the mailbody as comment :) Best wishes, Arne --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- - singing a part of the history of free software - http://infinite-hands.draketo.de signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
[freenet-dev] a670382: Add code for obtaining the USK URI which was used to create the USKRetriever.
re: http://github.com/freenet/fred-staging/commit/bfcd376880641c6eb40 getURI() is used no where but in some log message. It is safe to return any value. ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
