On 08/01/14 19:09, Ian Clarke wrote:
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.orgwrote:
Are users asking for this?
Yes, people are asking for it. And I said it would be an optional feature.
And Freenet does not compete with Tor.
I never said it did, nor do I believe that it does.
But Freenet is a distributed datastore. It *stores data*, in a
decentralised, censorship proof way. Which Tor does not do. Also IMHO in
the long run it could have greater anonymity. We are not competing with
Tor. We cannot possibly compete with Tor, because we do things
differently, we provide a different product, and if all the user cares
about is anonymity then they are going to use Tor, period.
Not if they are in China, where I believe Tor is quite effectively blocked
:-/
Freenet 0.7* is easy enough to block in opennet mode. I don't think the
Chinese bother right now though: we're small fry.
Last year's stats:
21029 27.66% US United States
6024 7.92% RU Russian Federation
5981 7.87% DE Germany
4685 6.16% GB United Kingdom
4581 6.03% JP Japan
4162 5.47% FR France
3053 4.02% BR Brazil
2808 3.69% CA Canada
2255 2.97% NL Netherlands
1889 2.48% SE Sweden
1366 1.80% AU Australia
1239 1.63% PL Poland
1118 1.47% MX Mexico
1042 1.37% IT Italy
1034 1.36% UA Ukraine
966 1.27% ES Spain
741 0.97% NO Norway
738 0.97% FI Finland
572 0.75% BE Belgium
570 0.75% CH Switzerland
549 0.72% AR Argentina
457 0.60% DK Denmark
444 0.58% AT Austria
442 0.58% CZ Czech Republic
410 0.54% CN China
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
