[xwiki-devs] OpenCollective for XWiki Community
Hi devs, This is a proposal for the content we would have if we were to create an OpenCollective account for XWiki. Take a look at https://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/XWikiOpenCollective The issues we need to solve / validate are: A. Decide on the URL name (xwiki is already taken by XWiki SAS) B. See if XWiki SAS can act like our Fiscal host C. Validate the tiers and content https://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/XWikiOpenCollective#HTiers (we might need more details on how the "Bug Fixer" works in case we agree to it) Let me know what you think, Caty
Re: [xwiki-devs] [Brainstorming] "Code" subspace for apps
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 5:04 PM Vincent Massol wrote: > Hi devs, > > I’ve just had a quick chat with Edy and I found that we had a difference > of opinion on the Code subspace practice. > > On > https://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/ApplicationDevelopmentBestPractices > we say: > "Technical pages must be put in a subspace named Code” > > Now Edy says that this should be done only for data-generating apps. > This sounds to me like an exception from a rule. Time has taught us that nothing is unchangeable and we can expect at some point to have some content in a non-data-generating app. I would prefer to keep the current rule. > It’s not my recollection that this rule was only for this case and this is > what I’d like to discuss here. > > For example, I’ve noticed that ActiveInstalls has all technical pages > under ActiveInstalls, see > > https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/tree/053f0a2757cea18a5916632a58c6046ba61954cd/xwiki-platform-core/xwiki-platform-activeinstalls/xwiki-platform-activeinstalls-server/xwiki-platform-activeinstalls-server-ui/src/main/resources/ActiveInstalls > > I would fix it to have only the WebHome remain under ActiveInstalls and > move all the technical pages under ActiveInstalls.Code. > > The only case where it could make sense to not have a Code subspace would > be when the app has no UI at all. Even in this case, you might argue that > we should always have a home to provide a description about the content of > the space. > > So right now I’m personally in favor of continuing the rule we defined in > the best practices: > "Technical pages must be put in a subspace named Code” > > WDYT? > > Thanks > -Vincent > > Thanks, Alex
[xwiki-devs] [Brainstorming] "Code" subspace for apps
Hi devs, I’ve just had a quick chat with Edy and I found that we had a difference of opinion on the Code subspace practice. On https://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/ApplicationDevelopmentBestPractices we say: "Technical pages must be put in a subspace named Code” Now Edy says that this should be done only for data-generating apps. It’s not my recollection that this rule was only for this case and this is what I’d like to discuss here. For example, I’ve noticed that ActiveInstalls has all technical pages under ActiveInstalls, see https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/tree/053f0a2757cea18a5916632a58c6046ba61954cd/xwiki-platform-core/xwiki-platform-activeinstalls/xwiki-platform-activeinstalls-server/xwiki-platform-activeinstalls-server-ui/src/main/resources/ActiveInstalls I would fix it to have only the WebHome remain under ActiveInstalls and move all the technical pages under ActiveInstalls.Code. The only case where it could make sense to not have a Code subspace would be when the app has no UI at all. Even in this case, you might argue that we should always have a home to provide a description about the content of the space. So right now I’m personally in favor of continuing the rule we defined in the best practices: "Technical pages must be put in a subspace named Code” WDYT? Thanks -Vincent
