Re: [DDN] PhD research on OLPC

2008-10-05 Thread Don Cameron
> Reinvent the word, not the concept, because the word "telecenter" does not
convey meaning
> to anyone who doesn't already know what it means. Whereas "community
computing center" 
> does convey meaning even if you never heard the phrase before. 

IMO a Telecentre is best defined by the societal context in which it exists
- Telecentre's in affluent society's tend to the model of an Internet Café -
in less affluent places, as centres of civic interest and engagement, a
communications centre, somewhere to meet, to train, to plan for business
opportunity. A library and perhaps even a medical centre. In the later
context computers may be less important than other of the services provided
by a Telecentre.

Don

___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@digitaldivide.net
http://digitaldivide.net/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


Re: [DDN] Fw: Re: PhD research on OLPC

2008-10-05 Thread Paperless Homework
Hello Sarah,
 
Yes what you said is true.
 
The point however is how you can improve on the current bad situation it 
already is.
 
Let me give you a very simple contribution of a simple OLPC laptop or rather we 
should use the term ULPC - Ultra Low cost PC rather than One Laptop Per child 
(which I do agree with you would be silly and does not work )
 
Let us take the extreme example of a remote village without electricity and 
like you say does not even have a single toilet.
 
Now, how can the government start to improve their current situations without 
huge investment of manpower (manual) and the likes for the whole country?
 
With a single ULPC powered maybe by a low cost solar panel (since a single ULPC 
would not need so much electricity unlike the entire class with ULPC linked 
with satellite disc etc).
 
If there is a simple dial up Internet connection available that would be great 
to provide instant update of contents. Let us say , this village does not even 
have that.
 
What can  a laptop do?
 
Assuming one is able to provide the laptop, we can assume that software can be 
preinstalled into it. If software contents that have very small footprints that 
would be even better because much much more contents can be placed into the 
laptop in initial installation to be updated through say pendrives later.
 
With a laptop (without projectors of course), at least a good number of people 
in that remote village shall be able to learning something. Get trained in the 
proper methods of agriculture for one, proper storage etc. A teacher shall be 
able to have access to right contents and be able to teach / pass on the 
knowledge to others like peer coaching even though that teacher does not have 
that skill initially.
 
This may not be the ideal situation but I strongly believe the best solution 
under the circumstances of remoteness, poverty etc is the best solution.
 
In fact I would say, the first laptop with its supporting equipments like solar 
power etc would be the first necessity for that village... not toilets nor how 
to irrigate their fields.
Knowlege and able to reach out to the most remote is the first goal. The rest 
would take care if itself.
 
That people in the village would start to learn how to read, how to irrigate 
their land etc not because some government teams came to teach them ...but from 
the little box you call a laptop.
 
If there is a simple dial up connection available and contents have very small 
footprints , it can do wonders especially to the little children of that remote 
village.
 
Alan
www.paperlesshomework.com
 
 
Oh, yeah! Just go spend a few days in an African village and then come back
and tell me what it is you think you can sell there. 

Composting toilets? (50% of Ghanaian villagers have NO toilets of any kind
and use the bushes.)

Solar lanterns? Some unknown majority of Ghanaian villagers use KEROSENE (a
dangerous poison) to "light" their homes.

Post-harvest processing equipment? A big part of every harvest rots in the
marketplace because the village doesn't have canning or bottling or
packaging equipment.

Foot-operated irrigation equipment? 99% of African farms are watered only by
rain, only in the rainy season.

School uniforms and notebooks for all children, including girls? AT least
1/2 of African girls don't go to secondary school.

I bet there are 100 other appropriate, low-cost products that villagers
would buy before a laptop computer 

Sarah 


The narratives of the world are numberless. . . . there nowhere is nor has
been a people without narrative.--Roland Barthes
 
Sarah Blackmun-Eskow
President, The Pangaea Network
290 North Fairview Avenue
Goleta CA 93117
805-692-6998
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.pangaeanetwork.org

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of arthur
richards
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 5:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: digitaldivide@digitaldivide.net
Subject: [DDN] Fw: Re: PhD research on OLPC

I think quite frankly in the developing world where I was brought up and
come from an OLPC is not the first need, it is not the second, it is not the
third, nor the fourth need nor the 10th most important need!
Business people want to sell and still have their heads in the sand that a
parent or government is going to squander $100 or $200 to buy a laptop when
that parent does not earn that in one year!

Wake up guys! Go to where you want to sell these things and come back.
You might just change your mind.

Arthur

--- On Mon, 22/9/08, Joel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Joel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [DDN] PhD research on OLPC
To: "The Digital Divide Network discussion group"

Received: Monday, 22 September, 2008, 1:55 PM

On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 5:09 AM, Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> what is the different between telecenters and 'community
computers'? If they are the same, for search purpose, perhaps we could keep
to the same terms?
> Cindy

In the 3rd world 

Re: [DDN] PhD research on OLPC

2008-10-05 Thread Paperless Homework
Hello steve,
 
I do generaly agree with your views except that I would like to change this 
little bit..
 
You said  " The real choice is between online learning or
no learning."
 
It would be more appropriate to rephrase it as 
 The real choice is between online/offline learning throug ICT or
no learning."
 
This is because to say online learning is the only choice for ICT in Education 
is not exactly right. More learning today are learnt through offline than 
online... in many homes and schools around the world. More people are offline 
at anyone time than online.
 
Another thing, having a computer or two in a telecenter does not mean only 1 or 
2 students may benefit.  That is the old model. Today telecenters can make use 
of 1 or 2 computers to serve entire class of students using projectors etc.  So 
it depends on how you use the computers. 
 
Having one computer for each(as originally intended in the OLPC) is good but in 
more cases than not ...impractical in third world countries (in fact I really 
doubt any third world country).
 
The real issue of the digital divide as far as schools are concerned today is 
the inabilities to 
reach out to the unreached anytime any place and any cost.
 
We can talk until the cows come home about other issues highlighted by many 
contributors here, without this being solved first, we are like trying to teach 
the rural folks to run before they able able to walk.
 
Hence to really close the digital divides among nations around the world, look 
into issue of reach... then we can start talking about pedagogy.
 
Read an article about our initiative here and perhaps most will understand what 
the world is doing and what she lacks as far as trying to reach the unreached 5 
billion.
http://www.govtech.com/dc/articles/270167
 
Meanwhile we should not forget about the environment impact our current schools 
are contributing to the deteriorating environments filling land fills with 
millions of tons of paper wastes. This in spite of all the high techs.
 
Read about about a Practical tech not high tech article by a 14 years 
experieced ICT journalist. 
www.paperlesshomework.com/surf
 
Regards
Alan
www.paperlesshomework.com
An elearning solution for rural areas where online/CDs cannot reach.

Get the latest happenings through paperlesshomework tool bar 
www.paperlesshomework.communitytoolbars.com

--- On Sat, 10/4/08, Steve Eskow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

From: Steve Eskow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [DDN] PhD research on OLPC
To: "The Digital Divide Network discussion group" 

Date: Saturday, October 4, 2008, 3:55 AM

Hi Tom,
Sorry to be so slow in responding. For some reason I missed this message of
yours when it arrived.

Perhaps it would be useful to put the matter of moving out of what Bourdieu
called
"the scholastic enclosure" into the new spaces of communication
technology
into an action research mode.

For example: we know that the poor nations aren't going to meet the
Millenium Development Goals for education by erecting buildings to teach and
house those now left untaught. The real choice is between online learning or
no learning.

One question, then, for research is how to bring computers and students
together.

 Sarah talked about "community computers." I've used the term
"social
computers," to contrast with the taken-for-granted rich country assumption
of the "personal computer." The "telecentre" is one
approach to the "social"
computer, and it has clear limitations. We can put a computer in a school, a
church, a kiosk, a cafe and it can serve one, three, five students.

Will such an approach do the job? We don't know for sure, but we can try,
keep careful records and report results.

On the matter of pedagogy: perhaps we need a transitional strategy, rather
than insisting that all existing syllabi and curriculum materials and
instructional strategies are hopelessly inadequate, an approach guaranteed
to frighten or threaten or anger many of the faculty whose support we need.
I, for one, would rather make existing instructional strategies made
available via ICT  than nothing at all. Again, we encourage an action
research approach, and we report on how well the traditional pedagogies do
when compared to the new ones that seem more authentic and relevant to us.

Steve


On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 9:19 AM, tom abeles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> Hi Steve
>
> You are right, there are transitions and there are different models. What
> might be appropriate today in Ghana might be different, today in the US.
The
> approach of education planners is to want to eventually find the one
global
> model. Yet with technology, as you suggest, there are many models for
> learning including different approaches from didactic, sage of stage, to a
> problem-based-learning model as examples.  The difference, today, seems to
> me to revolve around the ability of the knowledge to come to those that
need
> it when and where they need it. Information packages nicely and
doesn't
> ne

Re: [DDN] PhD research on OLPC

2008-10-05 Thread Sarah Blackmun-Eskow
Thank you, Joel, for pointing out all the taken-for-granteds implicit in the
advocacy of OLPC. Sarah 


The narratives of the world are numberless. . . . there nowhere is nor has
been a people without narrative.--Roland Barthes
 
Sarah Blackmun-Eskow
President, The Pangaea Network
290 North Fairview Avenue
Goleta CA 93117
805-692-6998
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.pangaeanetwork.org

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joel
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 10:57 AM
To: The Digital Divide Network discussion group
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [DDN] PhD research on OLPC

Hi, Cindy!

My post was not intended as a response to your inquiry (to which I extend my
apologies), but to segue BACK to the topic (OLPC) by relating it to
telecenters. Personally, I am in favor of both developments. BayangPinoy has
been working for the implementation of community/telecenters in the
Philippines for over 10 years now, and we actually look forward to a $100 PC
as something that a community of 100 families can afford 5 units of (as the
HW component of the telecenters).

FYI, my post was intended to point out that "community centers" (and
telecenters) are focused on COMMUNITY, while OLPCs (P - PERSONAL) and other
computer technologies are focused on individuals that can afford at least:
a) $100 for a computer,
b) $20/month for "acceptable broadband",
c) understands English (to maximize the value of the material available on
the internet)
d) has access to electronic bank accounts or credit cards (to be able to
participate in ecommerce),

and presumably:
c) understands English (to maximize the value of the material available on
the internet)
d) has access to electronic bank accounts or credit cards (to be able to
participate in ecommerce),
e) has the time / motivation / (?luxury) of "catching up" to all the
background knowledge that is a prerequisite of a "point-and-click"
networked system.

These items (a-e) are definitely not easy (or even possible) for the
majority of the citizens of under-developed countries.

Regards,
J Galgana
BayangPinoy Organization, Inc.


On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Joel,
> I think you misunderstood me. I was only asking for clarifications of the
differences between the term 'community computers' vs. telecenters. If you
read any of my previous posts you would understand that I am not supporter
of OLPC.
>
> To my understanding 'community computers' is no different than
telecenters. Just another new terms that says the same thing.
>
> Telecenter has been in existence for more than 20 years and there are many
well researched documents written on telecenter. Why reinventing the wheels?
>
> Cindy
>
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@digitaldivide.net
http://digitaldivide.net/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the word UNSUBSCRIBE in the body of the message.


___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@digitaldivide.net
http://digitaldivide.net/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.