DMD1 function template broken or did I f.u.?
Hi, all!
Try this:
--- snip ---
void remove(T)(out T[] array,T element) {
int r=0,w=0;
while (rarray.length) {
if (array[r]!=element)
array[w++]=array[r];
++r;
}
array.length=w;
}
void test() {
int[] array;
int element=2;
//
array=[1,3,2,2,1,3,1,1,2];
writef(direct\n);
writef( before : ,array,\n);
int r=0,w=0;
while (rarray.length) {
if (array[r]!=element)
array[w++]=array[r];
++r;
}
array.length=w;
writef( after : ,array,\n);
//
array=[1,3,2,2,1,3,1,1,2];
writef(template\n);
writef( before : ,array,\n);
remove!(int)(array,element);
writef( after : ,array,\n);
}
--- snap ---
I get the following output:
direct
before : [1,3,2,2,1,3,1,1,2]
after : [1,3,1,3,1,1]
template
before : [1,3,2,2,1,3,1,1,2]
after : []
So, my question is: Huh?
Kind regards.
Re: dmd 1.042 and 2.027 releases
bearophile wrote: I have tried on Windows, on a 2-core CPU and the CPU usage is about 50% still (only one core used). Well, I that's a pure reader thread running in the bg it wouldn't take any cpu time. That's because it's basically just waiting for data transfers from the disk to put them in a queue for the compiler thread.
Re: dmd 1.041 and 2.026 releases
Walter Bright wrote: [...] Back in college, a science historian did a nice lecture on how research was done. He said that in reading the scientists' notebooks, he found that they went all over the place in trying to find a solution. When they finally found it, they wrote a paper where they presented their activities as a straight line progression from hypothesis to proof, whereas the reality of how it actually happened was nothing like that. [...] Reminds me of Parnas' A rational design process: How and why to fake it... =)
Re: dmd 1.041 and 2.026 releases
Walter Bright wrote: [...] Essentially, it's pretty obvious that the world has changed, and closed source is no longer acceptable for a mainstream product that people will be relying on. Open source is the future, and it's past time for dmd to join the party! Hell, I'm at a loss for words! Go, D!
Re: Just one more thing...
Walter Bright wrote: Anders Bergh wrote: Just downloaded it and I can confirm that it does run on 10.4: [evidence] Woo-hoo! Congrats! =)
Re: D hits Slashdot
Daniel de Kok wrote: http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/02/22/1346256 :) I wonder if /that/ will do something to the TPCI... :)
