Re: DConf 2019 Livestream

2019-05-08 Thread Thomas Brix Larsen via Digitalmars-d-announce

On Wednesday, 8 May 2019 at 08:31:22 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 May 2019 at 08:21:33 UTC, Thomas Brix Larsen 
wrote:

I had to click Audio Connection -> Computer to get audio.


Where did you find those menus?


Button with three dots -> Audio Connection -> Call Using Computer 
for Audio.




Re: DConf 2019 Livestream

2019-05-08 Thread Thomas Brix Larsen via Digitalmars-d-announce

On Wednesday, 8 May 2019 at 08:25:18 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 May 2019 at 08:21:33 UTC, Thomas Brix Larsen 
wrote:


I am able to join with Firefox.  I can see the video, but no 
audio.  I'm still troubleshooting.


Mike


I had to click Audio Connection -> Computer to get audio.


You mean the "Call using computer" option.  That gives me an 
error:


"Can't Call Using Computer, We're having a problem connecting 
to audio using your computer. Choose another audio connection 
option or try again."


I guess it's unique to my computer.  I'll have to try from 
another computer.


Can you see Walter's presentation though?  It looks like just 
an overexposed whitewash.  I can't see anything on the 
presentation screen except white.


Mike


Yeah the slides are unreadable.



Re: DConf 2019 Livestream

2019-05-08 Thread Thomas Brix Larsen via Digitalmars-d-announce

On Wednesday, 8 May 2019 at 08:16:23 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:

On Wednesday, 8 May 2019 at 08:00:15 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:

On Wednesday, 8 May 2019 at 07:57:40 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
The venue uses WebEx for livestreaming. All the information 
is available in this PDF:


https://drive.google.com/open?id=1yekllbfOmxHqJNuuWIVeP9vNeROmfp1I


"When joining: Please connect using Internet Explorer, not 
Google Chrome or another web

browser."

You guys can't be serious, you're using WebEx?


I am able to join with Firefox.  I can see the video, but no 
audio.  I'm still troubleshooting.


Mike


I had to click Audio Connection -> Computer to get audio.


Re: Spasm 0.1.3 released - with bindings to web apis

2019-01-31 Thread Thomas Brix Larsen via Digitalmars-d-announce

On Wednesday, 30 January 2019 at 11:49:17 UTC, kinke wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 January 2019 at 11:03:13 UTC, WebFreak001 
wrote:
I install LDC from the arch repositories, which should just be 
the prebuilt binaries from the ldc repo I think


Nope, they aren't. I guess your problem is that you cannot 
*link* wasm; that will only work with v1.14 for distro packages 
(without integrated LLD).


The targets wasm32 and wasm64 are missing in the Arch package.



Re: Cap'n Proto for D v0.1.2

2017-04-20 Thread Thomas Brix Larsen via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Wednesday, 19 April 2017 at 19:30:03 UTC, Thomas Brix Larsen 
wrote:

On Wednesday, 19 April 2017 at 18:24:46 UTC, Jay Norwood wrote:

[...]

Ok, thanks. I took a look at several capnproto implementations 
just now, and didn't see any tests for a mmap 'feature'.  The 
roadmap doc below indicates it doesn't exist, and perhaps 
there are some details yet to be resolved to make it 
'friendly' for a mmap.


But reading using random access *is* a feature of Cap'n Proto. 
So when reading a memory mapped Cap'n Proto file, getters will 
be faster if you use it in a non-sequential way.




I have made some minor changes to make adaptors responsible for 
allocating buffers. This made it possible to add a new adaptor 
MemoryMapped and a sample[1] to show it off.


I have also verified that no buffer allocations happen while 
reading using MemoryMapped.


Note that writing using memory mapping is still not possible.

[1]: 
https://github.com/ThomasBrixLarsen/capnproto-dlang/blob/master/source/samples/mmap.d


Re: Cap'n Proto for D v0.1.2

2017-04-19 Thread Thomas Brix Larsen via Digitalmars-d-announce

On Wednesday, 19 April 2017 at 18:24:46 UTC, Jay Norwood wrote:

[...]

Ok, thanks. I took a look at several capnproto implementations 
just now, and didn't see any tests for a mmap 'feature'.  The 
roadmap doc below indicates it doesn't exist, and perhaps there 
are some details yet to be resolved to make it 'friendly' for a 
mmap.


But reading using random access *is* a feature of Cap'n Proto. So 
when reading a memory mapped Cap'n Proto file, getters will be 
faster if you use it in a non-sequential way.


The format of Cap'n Proto doesn't currently support *writing* to 
a memory mapped file.




Re: Cap'n Proto for D v0.1.2

2017-04-19 Thread Thomas Brix Larsen via Digitalmars-d-announce

On Wednesday, 19 April 2017 at 16:34:02 UTC, Jay Norwood wrote:

[...]

This info from stackoverflow also seems to imply that 
MappedByteBuffer would be required for some of the capnproto 
features.  So, could you explain a little more about what are 
the capabilities of the current d library implementation, with 
just the ByteBuffer implemented from the java nio code?  
Thanks, Jay


[...]


The port of ByteBuffer just wraps a slice when reading in D.

Take a look at FileDescriptor[1]. It is a class I've added to 
support read/write using File from std.stdio. You can create a 
similar streamer using std.mmfile. I believe that this would be 
enough for memory mapped reading.


[1]: 
https://github.com/ThomasBrixLarsen/capnproto-dlang/blob/master/source/capnproto/FileDescriptor.d


Cap'n Proto for D v0.1.2

2017-04-18 Thread Thomas Brix Larsen via Digitalmars-d-announce
"Cap’n Proto is an insanely fast data interchange format and 
capability-based RPC system. Think JSON, except binary. Or think 
Protocol Buffers, except faster."


This is the initial public release of my optimized port of the 
Java implementation of Cap'n Proto.


State:
* Passes Cap'n Proto testsuite.
* Optimized. Just a little slower than the official C++ 
implementation (see benchmarks on github).

* Missing RPC part of Cap'n Proto.

http://code.dlang.org/packages/capnproto-dlang
https://github.com/ThomasBrixLarsen/capnproto-dlang



Re: Release D 2.069.0

2015-11-09 Thread Thomas Brix Larsen via Digitalmars-d-announce

On Monday, 9 November 2015 at 03:15:29 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
On Monday, 9 November 2015 at 02:15:17 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:

On 11/8/15 2:58 PM, rsw0x wrote:
Interestingly, GDC seems *very* popular - it has a 4:1 
install rate of
gccgo and only trailing slightly behind the golang-go 
package(reference

compiler?) on Ubuntu's popcon.


Link? -- Andrei


debian:
https://qa.debian.org/popcon-graph.php?packages=gdc%2Cgccgo%2Cgolang_installed=on_legend=on_ticks=on_date=_date=_date=_fmt=%25Y-%25m=1

ubuntu:
http://ubuntu-popcon.43-1.org/cgi-bin/graph.pl?name=gdc
http://ubuntu-popcon.43-1.org/cgi-bin/graph.pl?name=golang-go
http://ubuntu-popcon.43-1.org/cgi-bin/graph.pl?name=gccgo

note that dmd is not redistributed on most linux distros due to 
licensing issues


Opt-in stats from Arch:

https://www.archlinux.de/?page=PackageStatistics

go 19.45%
rust5.92%
gcc-go  5.61%
dmd 2.56%
ldc 1.72%
gdc 1.60%