Re: Benjamin Thaut's talk: D's Import and Export Business
On Thursday, 19 May 2016 at 15:08:32 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote: On 05/19/2016 07:15 AM, flamencofantasy wrote: What's the URL to watch the videos? Thanks. Until the HD versions appear later (presumably on YouTube), all current videos are here: https://www.sociomantic.com/blog/2016/05/follow-dconf-2016-in-real-time/#.Vz3WR5R4foe You can find a particular day and talk in the scrollable list there. Ali Thank you.
Re: Benjamin Thaut's talk: D's Import and Export Business
On 05/19/2016 07:15 AM, flamencofantasy wrote: What's the URL to watch the videos? Thanks. Until the HD versions appear later (presumably on YouTube), all current videos are here: https://www.sociomantic.com/blog/2016/05/follow-dconf-2016-in-real-time/#.Vz3WR5R4foe You can find a particular day and talk in the scrollable list there. Ali
Re: Benjamin Thaut's talk: D's Import and Export Business
On Thursday, 19 May 2016 at 14:00:54 UTC, Andre Pany wrote: Hi, after looking Benjamins talk I took some time to think about it. Benjamin made some effort towards a sophisticated DLL suppport for D. What I understand: He won't push his changes until "export" will become an attribute. But without his changes there is no need to change the semantic of "export". It seems like a deadlock. I tried to find a solution to this problem. For the moment I ignore the export issue and have a look at linux. I understand in linux everything is exported by default. If it is decided, that this default behavior is changed in the long term, there needs to be a way to switch batch to the old behavior. Therefore a compiler switch "exportAll" will be necessary. So why do not start with this compiler switch, which will also export all symbols on windows. If the changes of Benjamin are adapted to this switch we can already get the sophisticated dll support and can later decide on the semantic change of export. Does this make sense? Kind regards André What's the URL to watch the videos? Thanks.
Benjamin Thaut's talk: D's Import and Export Business
Hi, after looking Benjamins talk I took some time to think about it. Benjamin made some effort towards a sophisticated DLL suppport for D. What I understand: He won't push his changes until "export" will become an attribute. But without his changes there is no need to change the semantic of "export". It seems like a deadlock. I tried to find a solution to this problem. For the moment I ignore the export issue and have a look at linux. I understand in linux everything is exported by default. If it is decided, that this default behavior is changed in the long term, there needs to be a way to switch batch to the old behavior. Therefore a compiler switch "exportAll" will be necessary. So why do not start with this compiler switch, which will also export all symbols on windows. If the changes of Benjamin are adapted to this switch we can already get the sophisticated dll support and can later decide on the semantic change of export. Does this make sense? Kind regards André
