Re: Image Resizing by Seam Carving (Was: On 80 columns should (not) be enough foreveryone)
Ulrik Mikaelsson ulrik.mikaels...@gmail.com wrote in message news:mailman.1098.1296493288.4748.digitalmar...@puremagic.com... Now, what we need is the audio-equivalent of this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6NcIJXTlugc That's really cool, and seems so obvious in retrospect. . . . I bet it's patented.
Re: Image Resizing by Seam Carving (Was: On 80 columns should (not) be enough foreveryone)
On 1/31/11 10:09 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote: I bet it's patented. http://www.freepatentsonline.com/7873211.html, it seems to apply to video only though. David
Re: Image Resizing by Seam Carving (Was: On 80 columns should (not) be enough foreveryone)
Nick Sabalausky napisał: Now, what we need is the audio-equivalent of this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6NcIJXTlugc That's really cool, and seems so obvious in retrospect. There's a D implementation: http://dsource.org/projects/seamzgood but it's abandoned. -- Tomek
Re: Image Resizing by Seam Carving (Was: On 80 columns should (not) be enough foreveryone)
David Nadlinger s...@klickverbot.at wrote in message news:ii797m$13ir$1...@digitalmars.com... On 1/31/11 10:09 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote: I bet it's patented. http://www.freepatentsonline.com/7873211.html, it seems to apply to video only though. It would have to be limited to video, the filing date is 2009 and this was presented at SIGGRAPH 2007. Jesus fuck, and they even *reference* that prior art in the very first Other References!! Gee, I wonder what douchebag owns this patent? Oh look, it's Don't Be Evil Google...Why am I not remotely surprised? (Hint: publically traded corporation together with don't be evil is complete fucking contradiction, by their very definitions. Always has been, always will be.)
