Re: My codebase have reached the critical size

[Arlen]

I have the same issue with my Boost.units port:
https://github.com/Arlen/phobos/blob/std_units/std/units.d

DMD runs out of memory and that's why I've had to comment out most of the
definitions.  I haven't tried separate compilation, yet.

Arlen

On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 3:37 AM, deadalnix  wrote:

> And that critical size isn't very large.
>
> I cannot compile anymore :
> Unable to fork: Cannot allocate memory
>
> I cannot use separate compilation to mitigate the problem as some symbol
> are not emitted properly (so I get linker errors).
>
> Hopefully, dmd is fast because it doesn't use any GC.
>

Re: My codebase have reached the critical size

[deadalnix]

On Sunday, 17 February 2013 at 12:20:15 UTC, deadalnix wrote:

On Sunday, 17 February 2013 at 05:25:28 UTC, kenji hara wrote:

2013/2/17 deadalnix 

On Saturday, 16 February 2013 at 09:54:10 UTC, Walter Bright 
wrote:



On 2/16/2013 1:37 AM, deadalnix wrote:

I cannot use separate compilation to mitigate the problem 
as some symbol

are not
emitted properly (so I get linker errors).



Are there bugzilla entries for these?



So reduced thing with dmd from git, and this still boils down 
to that :

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/**show_bug.cgi?id=8997



Just now, I posted another fix for bug 8997.
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1667



OK, tested and it does work ! otsukare sama !

But . . . This issue was hidding another one. I still have 
linking issue. I'm dustmiting it right now, but this will take 
a while !


http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9571

Re: My codebase have reached the critical size

[deadalnix]

On Sunday, 17 February 2013 at 05:25:28 UTC, kenji hara wrote:

2013/2/17 deadalnix 

On Saturday, 16 February 2013 at 09:54:10 UTC, Walter Bright 
wrote:



On 2/16/2013 1:37 AM, deadalnix wrote:

I cannot use separate compilation to mitigate the problem as 
some symbol

are not
emitted properly (so I get linker errors).



Are there bugzilla entries for these?



So reduced thing with dmd from git, and this still boils down 
to that :

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/**show_bug.cgi?id=8997



Just now, I posted another fix for bug 8997.
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1667



OK, tested and it does work ! otsukare sama !

But . . . This issue was hidding another one. I still have 
linking issue. I'm dustmiting it right now, but this will take a 
while !

Re: My codebase have reached the critical size

[Alexander Tankeev]

On 17.02.2013 8:27, deadalnix wrote:

On Saturday, 16 February 2013 at 09:54:10 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:

On 2/16/2013 1:37 AM, deadalnix wrote:

I cannot use separate compilation to mitigate the problem as some
symbol are not
emitted properly (so I get linker errors).


Are there bugzilla entries for these?


So reduced thing with dmd from git, and this still boils down to that :
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8997
I think http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9485 is about this 
bug too.

Re: My codebase have reached the critical size

[deadalnix]

On Sunday, 17 February 2013 at 05:25:28 UTC, kenji hara wrote:

Just now, I posted another fix for bug 8997.
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1667



I have to go now, but will test it this evening. Thank a lot for 
your hard work !

Re: My codebase have reached the critical size

[kenji hara]

2013/2/17 deadalnix 

> On Saturday, 16 February 2013 at 09:54:10 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>
>> On 2/16/2013 1:37 AM, deadalnix wrote:
>>
>>> I cannot use separate compilation to mitigate the problem as some symbol
>>> are not
>>> emitted properly (so I get linker errors).
>>>
>>
>> Are there bugzilla entries for these?
>>
>
> So reduced thing with dmd from git, and this still boils down to that :
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/**show_bug.cgi?id=8997
>

Just now, I posted another fix for bug 8997.
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1667

Kenji Hara

Re: My codebase have reached the critical size

[deadalnix]

On Saturday, 16 February 2013 at 09:54:10 UTC, Walter Bright 
wrote:

On 2/16/2013 1:37 AM, deadalnix wrote:
I cannot use separate compilation to mitigate the problem as 
some symbol are not

emitted properly (so I get linker errors).


Are there bugzilla entries for these?


So reduced thing with dmd from git, and this still boils down to 
that : http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8997

Re: My codebase have reached the critical size

[H. S. Teoh]

On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 12:12:38PM +0100, Maxim Fomin wrote:
> On Saturday, 16 February 2013 at 09:37:12 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> >And that critical size isn't very large.
> >
> >I cannot compile anymore :
> >Unable to fork: Cannot allocate memory
> >
> >I cannot use separate compilation to mitigate the problem as some
> >symbol are not emitted properly (so I get linker errors).
> >
> >Hopefully, dmd is fast because it doesn't use any GC.
> 
> Wasn't this a problem long before? My D environment on linux fails
> to unittest Phobos code with exactly same error message and I
> remember this was discussed in newsgroups.

This is still the situation, depending on how much memory your machine
has. I used to run the Phobos unittests with make -j6 to speed things
up, but recently I can't do it anymore without getting the above error
message, because std.algorithm will consume all the memory, leaving no
room for the others.

I remember having DMD do that on me as well, when one time I used
std.regex.ctRegex a bit too eagerly. I think (part of?) the problem is
that CTFE allocates memory but never frees it, so too much CTFE will
cause DMD to run out of memory.


T

-- 
Spaghetti code may be tangly, but lasagna code is just cheesy.

Re: My codebase have reached the critical size

[Maxim Fomin]

On Saturday, 16 February 2013 at 09:37:12 UTC, deadalnix wrote:

And that critical size isn't very large.

I cannot compile anymore :
Unable to fork: Cannot allocate memory

I cannot use separate compilation to mitigate the problem as 
some symbol are not emitted properly (so I get linker errors).


Hopefully, dmd is fast because it doesn't use any GC.


Wasn't this a problem long before? My D environment on linux 
fails to unittest Phobos code with exactly same error message and 
I remember this was discussed in newsgroups.

Re: My codebase have reached the critical size

[deadalnix]

On Saturday, 16 February 2013 at 09:54:10 UTC, Walter Bright 
wrote:

On 2/16/2013 1:37 AM, deadalnix wrote:
I cannot use separate compilation to mitigate the problem as 
some symbol are not

emitted properly (so I get linker errors).


Are there bugzilla entries for these?


They are for released version of dmd. For the new beta, things 
have changed, but it didn't reduced them to a simple test case 
yet.

Re: My codebase have reached the critical size

[Walter Bright]

On 2/16/2013 1:37 AM, deadalnix wrote:

I cannot use separate compilation to mitigate the problem as some symbol are not
emitted properly (so I get linker errors).


Are there bugzilla entries for these?

My codebase have reached the critical size

[deadalnix]

And that critical size isn't very large.

I cannot compile anymore :
Unable to fork: Cannot allocate memory

I cannot use separate compilation to mitigate the problem as some 
symbol are not emitted properly (so I get linker errors).


Hopefully, dmd is fast because it doesn't use any GC.