Re: The new DWT2
Saaa schrieb: dmd 2.026 phobos newest ruby one-click :) What am I doing wrong ? C:\_D\Compiler\dwt2rake (in C:/_D/Compiler/dwt2) Cleaning Building dwt-base Building org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32.x86 C:\_D\Compiler\dwt2\org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32.x86\src\org\eclipse\swt\internal\ole\win32\COMTYPES.d(19): Error: org.eclipse.swt.internal.win32.WINTYPES.IID at C:\_D\Compiler\dwt2\org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32.x86\src\org\eclipse\swt\internal\win32\WINTYPES.d(190) conflicts with org.eclipse.swt.internal.ole.win32.extras.IID at C:\_D\Compiler\dwt2\org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32.x86\src\org\eclipse\swt\internal\ole\win32\extras.d(54) C:\_D\Compiler\dwt2\org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32.x86\src\org\eclipse\swt\internal\ole\win32\OBJIDL.d(125): Error: org.eclipse.swt.internal.ole.win32.extras.IID at C:\_D\Compiler\dwt2\org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32.x86\src\org\eclipse\swt\internal\ole\win32\extras.d(54) conflicts with org.eclipse.swt.internal.win32.WINTYPES.IID at C:\_D\Compiler\dwt2\org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32.x86\src\org\eclipse\swt\internal\win32\WINTYPES.d(190) C:\_D\Compiler\dwt2\org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32.x86\src\org\eclipse\swt\internal\ole\win32\OBJIDL.d(382): Error: org.eclipse.swt.internal.ole.win32.extras.IID at C:\_D\Compiler\dwt2\org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32.x86\src\org\eclipse\swt\internal\ole\win32\extras.d(54) conflicts with org.eclipse.swt.internal.win32.WINTYPES.IID at C:\_D\Compiler\dwt2\org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32.x86\src\org\eclipse\swt\internal\win32\WINTYPES.d(190) C:\_D\Compiler\dwt2\org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32.x86\src\org\eclipse\swt\internal\ole\win32\OBJIDL.d(785): Error: org.eclipse.swt.internal.ole.win32.extras.IID at C:\_D\Compiler\dwt2\org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32.x86\src\org\eclipse\swt\internal\ole\win32\extras.d(54) conflicts with org.eclipse.swt.internal.win32.WINTYPES.IID at C:\_D\Compiler\dwt2\org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32.x86\src\org\eclipse\swt\internal\win32\WINTYPES.d(190) C:\_D\Compiler\dwt2\org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32.x86\src\org\eclipse\swt\internal\ole\win32\ifs.d(65): Error: org.eclipse.swt.internal.win32.WINTYPES.IID at C:\_D\Compiler\dwt2\org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32.x86\src\org\eclipse\swt\internal\win32\WINTYPES.d(190) conflicts with org.eclipse.swt.internal.ole.win32.extras.IID at C:\_D\Compiler\dwt2\org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32.x86\src\org\eclipse\swt\internal\ole\win32\extras.d(54) C:\_D\Compiler\dwt2\org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32.x86\src\org\eclipse\swt\events\SelectionListener.d(19): module Traits cannot read file 'tango\core\Traits.d' rake aborted! compile error C:/_D/Compiler/dwt2/rakefile:138:in `buildTree' Meanwhile the org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32.x86 tree builds for D2. But will not be usable until the missing impls are done.
I'm curious: when will D2 be declared stable?
In my limit knowledge, D2 has invariant+pure integrated already, to support functional paradigm. Is there any 'feature', cooking in backyard, so that d2 can't be declared stable? This is purely speculation: 1. Concurrent support? 2. Operator overhaul? 3. Add more paradigm??? :D 4. Something to assimilate Martian people? :D
Re: I'm curious: when will D2 be declared stable?
== Quote from The Anh Tran (trthe...@gmail.com)'s article In my limit knowledge, D2 has invariant+pure integrated already, to support functional paradigm. Is there any 'feature', cooking in backyard, so that d2 can't be declared stable? This is purely speculation: 1. Concurrent support? 2. Operator overhaul? 3. Add more paradigm??? :D 4. Something to assimilate Martian people? :D Well, this _was_ supposed to happen in April of this year b/c that's when Andrei's book was supposed to come out. Whether that's still feasible, IDK.
Re: I'm curious: when will D2 be declared stable?
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:07:02 +0300, The Anh Tran trthe...@gmail.com wrote: In my limit knowledge, D2 has invariant+pure integrated already, to support functional paradigm. Is there any 'feature', cooking in backyard, so that d2 can't be declared stable? This is purely speculation: 1. Concurrent support? 2. Operator overhaul? 3. Add more paradigm??? :D 4. Something to assimilate Martian people? :D I believe memory model (shared/thread-local separation etc) is not fully implemented yet. Other than that it's quite stable already and last few releases broke (almost) none of my code. P.S. Please, start new topic by clicking Compose, not Reply next time.
Re: I'm curious: when will D2 be declared stable?
The Anh Tran wrote: In my limit knowledge, D2 has invariant+pure integrated already, to support functional paradigm. Is there any 'feature', cooking in backyard, so that d2 can't be declared stable? This is purely speculation: 1. Concurrent support? 2. Operator overhaul? 3. Add more paradigm??? :D 4. Something to assimilate Martian people? :D Concurrency support.
Re: I'm curious: when will D2 be declared stable?
Walter Bright: Concurrency support. Is it possible for you to find a sponsor willing to pay you to implement exceptions on Windows inside LLVM? I think LLVM interests enough people, and exceptions can then be used in C++ code too. I have no idea of the amount of work required, but maybe one or two months of work may suffice to do that. Once LLVM has them, LDC can use them and can be used on Windows too. So LDC may become the reference D compiler (and it can grow support for D2 language in some months). LLVM isn't as efficient as GCC, but it's modern and actively developed. (Eventually a project like dil too (D front-end for LLVM written in D) may become viable, but that's for the future). Bye, bearophile
Re: I'm curious: when will D2 be declared stable?
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 5:50 PM, bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote: Jarrett Billingsley: What makes you have any expectation that Walter has anything to do with LLVM? Isn't LLVM open source? So anyone can help, especially if such person finds someone willing to pay for such work. Suuure, but do you honestly think Walter's going to drop everything he's doing and work on a project that he is currently not involved in in any way, to support a compiler that he didn't make? It just seems very unlikely, is all.
