Re: Programming in D book is about 78% translated
On 02/01/2013 03:55 AM, Philippe Sigaud wrote: I like how you introduce the new syntax for 'alias' and 'alias this'. I just learned that 'alias this' has been converted to the old syntax in 2.062. I can't find any obvious indicator in the changelog. Ali
Re: Programming in D book is about 78% translated
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Ali Çehreli acehr...@yahoo.com wrote: On 02/01/2013 03:55 AM, Philippe Sigaud wrote: I like how you introduce the new syntax for 'alias' and 'alias this'. I just learned that 'alias this' has been converted to the old syntax in 2.062. I can't find any obvious indicator in the changelog. *sigh* Wasn't it only 'alias this = symb;' that got ditched?
Re: Programming in D book is about 78% translated
On 02/22/2013 11:29 AM, Philippe Sigaud wrote: On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Ali Çehreliacehr...@yahoo.com wrote: On 02/01/2013 03:55 AM, Philippe Sigaud wrote: I like how you introduce the new syntax for 'alias' and 'alias this'. I just learned that 'alias this' has been converted to the old syntax in 2.062. I can't find any obvious indicator in the changelog. *sigh* Wasn't it only 'alias this = symb;' that got ditched? That's correct. Ali
Re: Programming in D book is about 78% translated
On Friday, 22 February 2013 at 20:00:58 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote: On 02/22/2013 11:29 AM, Philippe Sigaud wrote: On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Ali Çehreliacehr...@yahoo.com wrote: On 02/01/2013 03:55 AM, Philippe Sigaud wrote: I like how you introduce the new syntax for 'alias' and 'alias this'. I just learned that 'alias this' has been converted to the old syntax in 2.062. I can't find any obvious indicator in the changelog. *sigh* Wasn't it only 'alias this = symb;' that got ditched? That's correct. Ali After recent messages I realize that original depreciation discussion on github was really far away from community which is sign of proper announcement procedure failure. By the way, this also indicates that situation with D changelog is not satisfactory either.
Re: February 20, 2013—Component Programming in D—Walter Bright - slides video
I just received this from Lloyd, who runs NWCPP: - Folks, First off I would like to thank everyone who donated to our camera drive. This month was the first session recorded using the new camera setup and I think you will agree it is a BIG improvement. Also please note we are still experimenting with the camera, processing software and uploads to improve the experience, I expect this will take a couple more sessions to pin down fully. If you happen to spot something you can see us doing better please let us know. To help support the improved camera we have also moved away from Vimeo as our video host to YouTube. The free account on YouTube will allow us to upload much higher quality video! A channel has been created on YouTube to hold all of our videos, the channel name is “NWCPP”. The slides and video from the NWCPP meeting this week have been posted. They are available here: Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0cX1f41Fnkc Slides: http://nwcpp.org/static/talks/2013/ComponentProgrammingInD.pdf Thanks, Lloyd
Re: Programming in D book is about 78% translated
On 2/22/13, Maxim Fomin ma...@maxim-fomin.ru wrote: By the way, this also indicates that situation with D changelog is not satisfactory either. Yes, hopefully we can improve this. As a start I made this pull which lists language changes at the top: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/d-programming-language.org/pull/284
Re: February 20, 2013—Component Programming in D—Walter Bright - slides video
+1! Also might I suggest making NWCPP accounts on Facebook/Twitter/Google+ from which you can push out these sorts of announcements? The great thing about having the meeting announcements on those is that people can really easily reshare them to all their followers, thereby expanding the reach of the announcements. ---bb On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.comwrote: I just received this from Lloyd, who runs NWCPP: --**--- Folks, First off I would like to thank everyone who donated to our camera drive. This month was the first session recorded using the new camera setup and I think you will agree it is a BIG improvement. Also please note we are still experimenting with the camera, processing software and uploads to improve the experience, I expect this will take a couple more sessions to pin down fully. If you happen to spot something you can see us doing better please let us know. To help support the improved camera we have also moved away from Vimeo as our video host to YouTube. The free account on YouTube will allow us to upload much higher quality video! A channel has been created on YouTube to hold all of our videos, the channel name is “NWCPP”. The slides and video from the NWCPP meeting this week have been posted. They are available here: Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?**v=0cX1f41Fnkchttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0cX1f41Fnkc Slides: http://nwcpp.org/static/talks/**2013/ComponentProgrammingInD.**pdfhttp://nwcpp.org/static/talks/2013/ComponentProgrammingInD.pdf Thanks, Lloyd
Re: February 20, 2013—Component Programming in D—Walter Bright - slides video
Whoops, thought I was replying to the message from Lloyd that I saw in my inbox earlier today. On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Bill Baxter wbax...@gmail.com wrote: +1! Also might I suggest making NWCPP accounts on Facebook/Twitter/Google+ from which you can push out these sorts of announcements? The great thing about having the meeting announcements on those is that people can really easily reshare them to all their followers, thereby expanding the reach of the announcements. ---bb On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote: I just received this from Lloyd, who runs NWCPP: --**--- Folks, First off I would like to thank everyone who donated to our camera drive. This month was the first session recorded using the new camera setup and I think you will agree it is a BIG improvement. Also please note we are still experimenting with the camera, processing software and uploads to improve the experience, I expect this will take a couple more sessions to pin down fully. If you happen to spot something you can see us doing better please let us know. To help support the improved camera we have also moved away from Vimeo as our video host to YouTube. The free account on YouTube will allow us to upload much higher quality video! A channel has been created on YouTube to hold all of our videos, the channel name is “NWCPP”. The slides and video from the NWCPP meeting this week have been posted. They are available here: Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?**v=0cX1f41Fnkchttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0cX1f41Fnkc Slides: http://nwcpp.org/static/talks/**2013/ComponentProgrammingInD.** pdf http://nwcpp.org/static/talks/2013/ComponentProgrammingInD.pdf Thanks, Lloyd
Re: February 20, 2013—Component Programming in D—Walter Bright - slides video
Walter Bright: http://nwcpp.org/static/talks/2013/ComponentProgrammingInD.pdf Thank you for the slides. Regarding slide 38, in D code like this I often forget what's the source and the destination: foo.copy(bar); A copyTo function name is more clear for me: foo.copyTo(bar); Regarding slide 41 Reducers: the reduction with a + is a so common that I think Phobos should have a sum() function (as Haskell, Python and several other languages have). Bye, bearophile
