Re: D/Objective-C 64bit
What happens if you declare "doubleClickAction" like this:
void doubleClickAction(NSTableView sender) { ... }
That will probably require a cast when passing the selector to
"setDoubleAction".
Hi Jacob
This just "delegates" the "problem" to another place. The
target/action paradigm in Cocoa programming gets a lot from the
fact that any object can be the sender of an action. In this
particular case I'd even prefer the conditional if the sender
"is" the local table view member var, which then basically has
the same effect as what you suggested above.
I think the best thing will be to fix the interface-to-class
casts in the compiler, as Michel suggests above.
Thanks again
Christian
porting nanomsg bindings to dlang
Hi. Everyone has heard of ZeroMQ, but the creator (or one of the main guys) has been working on a successor framework written in C. (He has an interesting paper on why using C++ was a mistake - perhaps we should get him to look at D if he has not done so already). In any case, I could not see a set of D bindings so I wrote a very rough first draft of them last night. I only picked up D a couple of months back, and it's been about twenty years since I wrote much C (I am not a developer by trade), so be kind if the results are not yet quite up to scratch. Link to the repository is here - not even worthy of alpha status: https://github.com/Laeeth/d-nanomsg/tree/master So far I have tried the first example from here (which works), and am working my way down to test the others: http://tim.dysinger.net/posts/2013-09-16-getting-started-with-nanomsg.html
porting nanomsg bindings to dlang
examples here all work: https://github.com/dysinger/nanomsg-examples/blob/master/README.org but I have not tried any larger projects.
Re: porting nanomsg bindings to dlang
On 11/05/2014 01:12 PM, Laeeth Isharc wrote: > Hi. > > Everyone has heard of ZeroMQ, but the creator (or one of the main guys) has > been working on a successor framework written in C. (He has an interesting > paper on why using C++ was a mistake - perhaps we should get him to look at D > if he has not done so already). > > In any case, I could not see a set of D bindings so I wrote a very rough > first draft of them last night. I only picked up D a couple of months back, > and it's been about twenty years since I wrote much C (I am not a developer > by trade), so be kind if the results are not yet quite up to scratch. > > Link to the repository is here - not even worthy of alpha status: > https://github.com/Laeeth/d-nanomsg/tree/master > > So far I have tried the first example from here (which works), and am working > my way down to test the others: > > http://tim.dysinger.net/posts/2013-09-16-getting-started-with-nanomsg.html > A few small suggestions: Use a .gitignore so you're not tracking the objects and executables Convert to a dub package to make it easier for other people to incorporate into their projects Split out the "test" code from the "library" code -- Matt Soucy http://msoucy.me/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: porting nanomsg bindings to dlang
Thanks. I am slowly getting to grips with all these post-stone age innovations... On Wednesday, 5 November 2014 at 20:24:41 UTC, Matt Soucy wrote: On 11/05/2014 01:12 PM, Laeeth Isharc wrote: Hi. Everyone has heard of ZeroMQ, but the creator (or one of the main guys) has been working on a successor framework written in C. (He has an interesting paper on why using C++ was a mistake - perhaps we should get him to look at D if he has not done so already). In any case, I could not see a set of D bindings so I wrote a very rough first draft of them last night. I only picked up D a couple of months back, and it's been about twenty years since I wrote much C (I am not a developer by trade), so be kind if the results are not yet quite up to scratch. Link to the repository is here - not even worthy of alpha status: https://github.com/Laeeth/d-nanomsg/tree/master So far I have tried the first example from here (which works), and am working my way down to test the others: http://tim.dysinger.net/posts/2013-09-16-getting-started-with-nanomsg.html A few small suggestions: Use a .gitignore so you're not tracking the objects and executables Convert to a dub package to make it easier for other people to incorporate into their projects Split out the "test" code from the "library" code
