Re: Project Highlight: Derelict
On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 14:55:25 UTC, arturg wrote: s/you don't tend find/you don't tend to find/ s/As the D has evolved/As D has evolved/ Thanks!
Re: Project Highlight: Derelict
On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 14:30:13 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: I've just published a wall of text about Derelict. I don't think I've ever written so much about it in one sitting, so it was a fun post to write. As well as (the reminder of how fast time is slipping away aside) a nice walk down memory lane. The Blog: https://dlang.org/blog/2017/06/26/project-highlight-derelict/ Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/6jldos/derelict_a_collection_of_d_bindings_to_c_libraries/ s/you don't tend find/you don't tend to find/ s/As the D has evolved/As D has evolved/
Project Highlight: Derelict
I've just published a wall of text about Derelict. I don't think I've ever written so much about it in one sitting, so it was a fun post to write. As well as (the reminder of how fast time is slipping away aside) a nice walk down memory lane. The Blog: https://dlang.org/blog/2017/06/26/project-highlight-derelict/ Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/6jldos/derelict_a_collection_of_d_bindings_to_c_libraries/
Re: past.code123.org new service for sharing D code.
On Saturday, 24 June 2017 at 12:59:50 UTC, Suliman wrote: Sorry! Domain should be not `past` `but` `paste` http://paste.code123.org/ version 0.2 split-view support: http://paste.code123.org/86fc5ded-90e1 P.S. WIP
Re: Beta 2.075.0-b1
On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 11:53:57 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: First beta for the 2.075.0 release. This release comes with various phobos additions, a repackaged std.datetime, configurable Fiber stack guard pages (now also on Posix), and optional precise scanning for the DATA/TLS segment (static data) on Windows. http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta http://dlang.org/changelog/2.075.0.html Please report any bugs at https://issues.dlang.org - -Martin Martin, there's a PR for the changelog which needs to be merged: https://github.com/dlang/druntime/pull/1821
Beta 2.075.0-b1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 First beta for the 2.075.0 release. This release comes with various phobos additions, a repackaged std.datetime, configurable Fiber stack guard pages (now also on Posix), and optional precise scanning for the DATA/TLS segment (static data) on Windows. http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta http://dlang.org/changelog/2.075.0.html Please report any bugs at https://issues.dlang.org - -Martin -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJZUPXVAAoJELJzgRYSuxk5m9oP/0kj1oTeNQeILn3MB54GHXI8 bl8wm5JlZAyuIyMlcIU2ZL8sWhVdiTK0TvBGp0GH7o5pDxj+Kg06Pd5YG2OS9Ynh YyEisLqD9e+ssYYfYSwo5lasbl1pluM+TYZnaokqSeOkmKoBDy13/caM4DV7Kmmj YWxBPa4F6RCH2ogD80QRdk13w2TOUYxRiBTobUquNNMJDG2Dj2FxSKJ5E4qSOiVm WK2rUulyumx+I+So4AkBdc4sy7UUdiDI3Jp7TgrDrXLn7Z/J3fL6uL5zEKTeWSyF 8k1PrxgichrNODEd2VA7qF4ibkGgr2jAC89isdiIFVOCjF84A5mAFnHbYojE6Rzp 4lEfB2kxmoN4mQ+K4JpEhZhxPD05pT2UycJGp1iRFchSpqKjyqtdZq5cdRzlkSFC v5N4k8xX3AC+slVRqdGP3v326wCYCEmEeyKd7V0Er6nch2ZochZt0Y2xa5St9t4S KzL57rdP1IWwkW0a4tHyRlAsBiqBTuUeqZlvpdOhaCO494WW8OdhVzkHpzPkKQTV NpbtNecw+lzMFLijQJuZVUcwbWGUtuQ1A0nD58kNRYIs6rQpXEEdpWE6XOAbE1X5 SExrViP8+7OK6EsFzK8r3lNykw+3Fylc9JgiIR6dFnfGTdLyXUA7luROMrTeKtHl 0ARAwLlU3ZwTB6sZRbUD =z0ku -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: The DLang Tour translated into Russian
On Thursday, 15 June 2017 at 09:48:48 UTC, Dmitry wrote: On Wednesday, 14 June 2017 at 06:54:23 UTC, Vadim Lopatin wrote: Кто-нибудь из переводчиков хочет написать статью на Хабре? В принципе, я мог бы заняться, но не раньше следующей недели. Если кто-то хочет раньше - пишите. Запостил новость на Хабр: https://habrahabr.ru/post/331670/
Re: RedMonk language rankings June 15, 2017
On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 10:23:05 UTC, Martin Tschierschke wrote: This is only partially true, as I know from a friend, he is physicist @ DESY Hamburg, he is programming exactly with this pair of languages for data analysis. (Could not convince him to try D jet :-)) If the comparison was broken down into usage domains (such as physics) then it could be quite interesting. Which languages are popular in different field and why? Would interesting to know something about that. But when all usage domains are included, and only one public source repository is taken into account, then it doesn't really say much.
Re: RedMonk language rankings June 15, 2017
On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 10:14:42 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 09:51:37 UTC, Wulfklaue wrote: They are comparing the old, newer and newest ( in that order ). Yes, that was confusing too. But it makes no sense to plot ranking on a linear scale, they should plot actual numbers. The plot they provide says nothing meaningful about the relative position of the various languages IMO. Unfortunately for "D", it is also a language that is often misclassified in these shallow analyses. For instance the ".d" file extension is used for other things than dlang etc. And does it actually make any sense to compare languages like Python and C++? Completely different domains. This is only partially true, as I know from a friend, he is physicist @ DESY Hamburg, he is programming exactly with this pair of languages for data analysis. (Could not convince him to try D jet :-)) Regards mt.
Re: RedMonk language rankings June 15, 2017
On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 09:51:37 UTC, Wulfklaue wrote: They are comparing the old, newer and newest ( in that order ). Yes, that was confusing too. But it makes no sense to plot ranking on a linear scale, they should plot actual numbers. The plot they provide says nothing meaningful about the relative position of the various languages IMO. Unfortunately for "D", it is also a language that is often misclassified in these shallow analyses. For instance the ".d" file extension is used for other things than dlang etc. And does it actually make any sense to compare languages like Python and C++? Completely different domains.
Re: RedMonk language rankings June 15, 2017
On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 09:30:04 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: It is flawed. Clearly, there should be far more Go github projects than D. It is correct. I assume you looked at the first Red Chart. That is a very, very old one. The article even mentioned that this. You need to look down for the newer from 2017 and Go has clearly plenty more git projects. They are comparing the old, newer and newest ( in that order ).
Re: RedMonk language rankings June 15, 2017
On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 09:30:04 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: On Sunday, 25 June 2017 at 00:52:14 UTC, Wulfklaue wrote: On Saturday, 24 June 2017 at 22:05:44 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: http://i-programmer.info/news/98-languages/10859-redmonk-rankings-reveal-the-languages-we-love.html -- Andrei It looks like D almost never moved on those rankings. It is flawed. Clearly, there should be far more Go github projects than D. As in, plotting ranks does not make much sense... If they plotted actual number of projects then it would be useful.
Re: RedMonk language rankings June 15, 2017
On Sunday, 25 June 2017 at 00:52:14 UTC, Wulfklaue wrote: On Saturday, 24 June 2017 at 22:05:44 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: http://i-programmer.info/news/98-languages/10859-redmonk-rankings-reveal-the-languages-we-love.html -- Andrei It looks like D almost never moved on those rankings. It is flawed. Clearly, there should be far more Go github projects than D.
