Re: D IDE dexed - v3.7.10 available
On Monday, 10 June 2019 at 20:34:14 UTC, Basile B. wrote: [1] https://github.com/Basile-z/dexed [2] https://github.com/Basile-z/dexed/releases/tag/v3.7.10 Thank you, very interesting. But... lazbuild -B -r dexed.lpi TEditorToolBarOptions.Load: Using old configuration in editortoolbar.xml. Hint: (lazarus) [RunTool] /usr/bin/fpc "-iWTOTP" Hint: (lazarus) [RunTool] /usr/bin/fpc "-va" "-Fr/usr/lib64/fpc/msg/errore.msg" "compilertest.pas" Error: (lazbuild) Broken dependency: DexedDesignControls
Re: Beta 2.086.1
On Thursday, 13 June 2019 at 03:48:05 UTC, Eugene Wissner wrote: On Wednesday, 12 June 2019 at 23:51:39 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: Glad to announce the first beta for the 2.086.1 point release, ♥ to the 20 contributors. http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta http://dlang.org/changelog/2.086.1.html As usual please report any bugs at https://issues.dlang.org -Martin Mathis Beer and FeepingCreature are the same person. And "Suleyman Sahmi" is listed twice.
Re: Beta 2.086.1
On Wednesday, 12 June 2019 at 23:51:39 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: Glad to announce the first beta for the 2.086.1 point release, ♥ to the 20 contributors. http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta http://dlang.org/changelog/2.086.1.html As usual please report any bugs at https://issues.dlang.org -Martin Mathis Beer and FeepingCreature are the same person.
Beta 2.086.1
Glad to announce the first beta for the 2.086.1 point release, ♥ to the 20 contributors. http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta http://dlang.org/changelog/2.086.1.html As usual please report any bugs at https://issues.dlang.org -Martin
Re: DIP 1013--The Deprecation Process--Formal Assessment
On Wednesday, 12 June 2019 at 11:40:27 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote: On Wednesday, June 12, 2019 2:47:23 AM MDT Nicholas Wilson via Digitalmars- d-announce wrote: On Monday, 10 June 2019 at 13:49:27 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: > DIP 1013, "The Deprecation Process", has been accepted. > ... > https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/accepted/DIP1013.md So what is the "version" in @@@DEPRECATED_[version]@@@ supposed to be? That still seems to be ambiguous. How is it ambiguous? It says right in the same sentence that @@@DEPRECATED_[version]@@@ is mentioned. - Jonathan M Davis Wow. Note to self, don't read post and sleep all at the same time.
Re: DIP 1013--The Deprecation Process--Formal Assessment
On Wednesday, June 12, 2019 2:47:23 AM MDT Nicholas Wilson via Digitalmars- d-announce wrote: > On Monday, 10 June 2019 at 13:49:27 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: > > DIP 1013, "The Deprecation Process", has been accepted. > > ... > > https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/accepted/DIP1013.md > > So what is the "version" in @@@DEPRECATED_[version]@@@ supposed > to be? That still seems to be ambiguous. How is it ambiguous? It says right in the same sentence that @@@DEPRECATED_[version]@@@ is mentioned. - Jonathan M Davis
Re: DIP 1013--The Deprecation Process--Formal Assessment
On Monday, 10 June 2019 at 13:49:27 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: DIP 1013, "The Deprecation Process", has been accepted. ... https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/accepted/DIP1013.md So what is the "version" in @@@DEPRECATED_[version]@@@ supposed to be? That still seems to be ambiguous.
Re: Let's celebrate Dlang on D day
On 6/11/2019 11:03 PM, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote: My grandfather and *at least* one (to my immediate knowledge) of my great uncles were WW2 veterans. For all I know, they could have been D-Day, or any other involvement, but nobody in our family would ever know because they made a point of never talking about it (hence my uncertainty about how many more there may have been). One of them even declined a major award (purple star or metal of honor, was never clear on which)...or maybe it was that he was sent one, but never acknowledged it...either way, same sentiment. They're both gone now for unrelated old-age reasons, but from what I've been able to piece together, the idea was that their participation was something that needed to be done, but should NEVER involve taking pride in - as that would be an unethical validation of war and the unspeakable actions that it made necessary. (That, and the whole "true heroes don't survive" thing.) Frankly, I think that's a rather appropriate attitude to take toward such service. I understand the sentiment (as much as someone who was never in combat can), and respect your uncles for taking that path.
