Re: bindbc-raylib3 version 2.0.0 (raylib 4.2.0) released

2022-09-02 Thread o3o via Digitalmars-d-announce

On Friday, 2 September 2022 at 18:32:49 UTC, Sergey wrote:

On Friday, 2 September 2022 at 16:09:15 UTC, o3o wrote:
after the excellent work of 
[Steven](https://forum.dlang.org/post/teg1cn$12e8$1...@digitalmars.com) I released version 2.0.0 of the [bindbc-raylib3](https://github.com/o3o/bindbc-raylib3), based on raylib 4.2.0.


See 
[changelog](https://github.com/o3o/bindbc-raylib3/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md) and [version note](https://github.com/o3o/bindbc-raylib3/wiki/version).


Just curious - why in code.Dlang.org so many versions of raylib 
bindings? How are they differ from each other?

Some guide or how-to choose the “right” version for user..


See 
[here](https://github.com/o3o/bindbc-raylib3/wiki/raylib-D-bindings)


TL;DR
we have 5 packages: 3 are static binding and two are 
dynamic/static binding.


Static packages are very similiar,  the most up-to-date is 
raylib-d that it is based on raylib 4.2.0


The two "dynamic" packages have different loaders: dynalib for 
dynalib-raylib and bindbc-loader for bindbc-raylib3




Re: bindbc-raylib3 version 2.0.0 (raylib 4.2.0) released

2022-09-02 Thread Sergey via Digitalmars-d-announce

On Friday, 2 September 2022 at 16:09:15 UTC, o3o wrote:
after the excellent work of 
[Steven](https://forum.dlang.org/post/teg1cn$12e8$1...@digitalmars.com) I released version 2.0.0 of the [bindbc-raylib3](https://github.com/o3o/bindbc-raylib3), based on raylib 4.2.0.


See 
[changelog](https://github.com/o3o/bindbc-raylib3/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md) and [version note](https://github.com/o3o/bindbc-raylib3/wiki/version).


Just curious - why in code.Dlang.org so many versions of raylib 
bindings? How are they differ from each other?

Some guide or how-to choose the “right” version for user..


bindbc-raylib3 version 2.0.0 (raylib 4.2.0) released

2022-09-02 Thread o3o via Digitalmars-d-announce
after the excellent work of 
[Steven](https://forum.dlang.org/post/teg1cn$12e8$1...@digitalmars.com) I released version 2.0.0 of the [bindbc-raylib3](https://github.com/o3o/bindbc-raylib3), based on raylib 4.2.0.


See 
[changelog](https://github.com/o3o/bindbc-raylib3/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md) and [version note](https://github.com/o3o/bindbc-raylib3/wiki/version).


Re: D Language Foundation July 2022 Quarterly Meeting Summary

2022-09-02 Thread Bastiaan Veelo via Digitalmars-d-announce

On Sunday, 28 August 2022 at 10:37:03 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:

This summary is quite a bit overdue. Sorry for the delay.


Thanks for this, and for keeping all the details. Good work!

— Bastiaan.



Re: D Language Foundation July 2022 Quarterly Meeting Summary

2022-09-02 Thread Bastiaan Veelo via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Sunday, 28 August 2022 at 11:04:45 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer 
wrote:

On 8/28/22 6:37 AM, Mike Parker wrote:
SARC has marked a major milestone in that their 500KLOC 
Extended Pascal codebase has been completely transcompiled to D


This is awesome! I remember that talk, and it was very 
interesting.


Congratulations!

-Steve


Thank you!

The process takes several times longer than anticipated, but we 
are not giving up :-)


Although it is an important milestone, it doesn’t mean we can now 
all code in D. Almost all commits still happen in Pascal. I have 
started transpiling every commit separately, to create a commit 
history in D that overlaps the Pascal history for some period.


Next week we plan on using the D versions of our software 
internally, to expose a larger surface area to testing and 
scrutiny. This is arguably a bigger milestone.


What we all look forward to the most is the last milestone 
though, where we’ll freeze the Pascal repository and switch from 
programming in Pascal to programming in D overnight.


— Bastiaan.


Re: DConf '22 Slide Links and Update on Videos

2022-09-02 Thread Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-announce

On Thursday, 18 August 2022 at 15:26:20 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:

I was hoping to start editing those in the next couple of days, 
but there may be a bit of delay.


As of today, I finally have access to the raw footage from the 
main camera and I've downloaded all of it. I'm a bit busy with 
life this weekend, so I don't expect to start in on the editing 
until Monday. If all goes well, I'll have all of the talks edited 
and uploaded by the end of the month, but it could end up 
stretching into October.