Re: Phobos 3 Development is Open!
On Thursday, 29 February 2024 at 13:44:37 UTC, Andrew wrote: On Wednesday, 28 February 2024 at 20:41:46 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote: I am totally on board with this if the community thinks there are improvements to be had here. Head on over to the Design repo and you can either submit a PR to the design document, or start a discussion if there is disagreement on how to handle this. I'll see if I can check it out next weekend, if that's not too late. Studying for my private pilot exam takes priority sadly. As a fellow pilot, I agree with this prioritization.
Re: Phobos 3 Development is Open!
On Wednesday, 28 February 2024 at 15:45:06 UTC, ryuukk_ wrote: https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/8925/files#diff-647aa2ce9ebedd6759a2f1c55752f0279de8ae7ba55e3c270bd59e1f8c1a5162R131 Why can't D have its own types? Just importing this introduces dependencies on other system modules ```D import core.stdc.config; import core.stdc.stddef; // for wchar_t import core.stdc.signal; // for sig_atomic_t import core.stdc.wchar_; // for wint_t ``` Wich makes phobos harder to use on platforms without these I think Phobos as a base shouldn't depend on libc, only specific parts eg: network/event modules for example, so it becomes easier to port when required +1 My current setup in wasm has a broken libc and that makes most the std useless unleast I want to go wack a mole in the depths of core.math
Re: Phobos 3 Development is Open!
On Wednesday, 28 February 2024 at 20:41:46 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote: I am totally on board with this if the community thinks there are improvements to be had here. Head on over to the Design repo and you can either submit a PR to the design document, or start a discussion if there is disagreement on how to handle this. I'll see if I can check it out next weekend, if that's not too late. Studying for my private pilot exam takes priority sadly.
Re: Minor note, D on NASA Goddard software page
On Thursday, 29 February 2024 at 03:27:14 UTC, Tejas wrote: So now we can add NASA in the list of organisations that use D, right?... # яла Well not quite yet*, but it is supporting a few payloads on some rather well known robotic spacecraft. *AFAIK
Re: The New DIP Process
On Thursday, 29 February 2024 at 05:44:08 UTC, Brad Roberts wrote: I set them up earlier today. It's entirely possible I missed something while configuring them as it's been just over 6 years since the last new group was added, so do shout if anything looks off. I see that the first two messages already posted made it through, so my confidence is reasonably high. Also worth noting, the news group names are NOT dip.idea and dip.development. They're actually digitalmars.dip.ideas (note the plural) and digitalmars.dip.development. I made the list names just dip.ideas@ and dip.development@ for brevity. Later, Brad Much appreciated, Brad!
