Re: D 2.066 new behavior

2014-08-22 Thread Paul D Anderson via Digitalmars-d-announce

On Friday, 22 August 2014 at 02:26:38 UTC, safety0ff wrote:
On Friday, 22 August 2014 at 01:54:55 UTC, Paul D Anderson 
wrote:


Is this expected behavior that has never been enforced before, 
or is it something new?


And is anyone else having the same problem?

Paul


Looks like a regression, I've filed it here: 
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13351


Seems to be a duplicate of bug 13294:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13294


D 2.066 new behavior

2014-08-21 Thread Paul D Anderson via Digitalmars-d-announce
In all previous versions through 2.066 beta 5, the following code 
compiled and ran correctly:


import std.stdio;

T add(T)(in T x, in T y)
{
T z;
z = x + y;
return z;
}

void main()
{
const double a = 1.0;
const double b = 2.0;
double c;
c = add(a,b);
writefln(c = %s, c);// 3.0
c = 1.0;
writefln(c = %s, c);// 1.0
}

From beta 6 onward it no longer compiles. The problem seems to be 
const qualifiers being carried into the template type. Since a 
and b are const double, the function template parameter T is 
const double. So x and y are const, no problem, but z is now 
const also. The following error message is given.


T add(T)(in T x, in T y)
{
T z;
z = x + y;  // Error: Can't modify const expression z
return z;
}

The same problem shows up elsewhere as 'cannot implicitly convert 
const x to x'
and 'none of the overloads are callable using argument types (x) 
const'.


Is this expected behavior that has never been enforced before, or 
is it something new?


And is anyone else having the same problem?

Paul


Re: D 2.066 new behavior

2014-08-21 Thread safety0ff via Digitalmars-d-announce

On Friday, 22 August 2014 at 01:54:55 UTC, Paul D Anderson wrote:


Is this expected behavior that has never been enforced before, 
or is it something new?


And is anyone else having the same problem?

Paul


Looks like a regression, I've filed it here: 
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13351