Re: LDC 1.17.0
On Sunday, 25 August 2019 at 14:00:08 UTC, kinke wrote: Glad to announce LDC 1.17: * Based on D 2.087.1. * The DMD fix wrt. 'local templates can now receive local symbols' hasn't been ported yet. * LLVM upgraded to v8.0.1. * Fix for v1.16.0 regression when returning void expressions. * Init symbols, TypeInfos and vtables of non-exported aggregates are now hidden with `-fvisibility=hidden`. * Don't ignore some options like `-lowmem` in response files. * Proper Unicode support for LDC/LDMD itself on Windows. * More fixes... Full release log and downloads: https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/releases/tag/v1.17.0 Thanks to all contributors! Thank you!
Re: LDC 1.17.0
On Wednesday, 4 September 2019 at 20:54:40 UTC, kinke wrote: There's a new v1.17 Termux package for Android. Thanks for the keep the great work. without LDC, there is not so much d users.
Re: LDC 1.17.0
On Wednesday, 4 September 2019 at 20:54:40 UTC, kinke wrote: There's a new v1.17 Termux package for Android. Cool !!!
Re: LDC 1.17.0
There's a new v1.17 Termux package for Android.
Re: LDC 1.17.0-beta1
On Saturday, 10 August 2019 at 15:51:28 UTC, kinke wrote: Glad to announce the first beta for LDC 1.17: * Based on D 2.087.1+ (stable from some days ago). * The DMD fix wrt. 'local templates can now receive local symbols' hasn't been ported yet. * LLVM upgraded to v8.0.1. * Fix for v1.16.0 regression when returning void expressions. * Don't ignore some options like `-lowmem` in response files. * Proper Unicode support for LDC/LDMD itself on Windows. * More fixes... Full release log and downloads: https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/releases/tag/v1.17.0-beta1 Please help test, and thanks to all contributors! Passing all tests in intel-intrinsics! This seem to support Catalina, very glad about this :) THANKS
Re: LDC 1.17.0-beta1
On Saturday, 10 August 2019 at 17:04:15 UTC, aliak wrote: Are there plans to port this or is it just too unworkable as is? And if it is too unworkable is there anything that can be done to get it in? It needs analysis first, to estimate whether a different implementation in the front-end is feasible and worth it, or whether porting the required codegen modifications (to each non-DMD compiler) is less trouble and acceptable. I haven't looked at it in detail yet and am not looking forward to it.
Re: LDC 1.17.0-beta1
On Saturday, 10 August 2019 at 15:51:28 UTC, kinke wrote: Glad to announce the first beta for LDC 1.17: ... Please help test, and thanks to all contributors! No changes in my standard performance tests (good). All functional tests pass as well.
Re: LDC 1.17.0-beta1
On Saturday, 10 August 2019 at 15:51:28 UTC, kinke wrote: Glad to announce the first beta for LDC 1.17: Nice! * Based on D 2.087.1+ (stable from some days ago). * The DMD fix wrt. 'local templates can now receive local Are there plans to port this or is it just too unworkable as is? And if it is too unworkable is there anything that can be done to get it in? symbols' hasn't been ported yet. * LLVM upgraded to v8.0.1. * Fix for v1.16.0 regression when returning void expressions. * Don't ignore some options like `-lowmem` in response files. * Proper Unicode support for LDC/LDMD itself on Windows. * More fixes... Full release log and downloads: https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/releases/tag/v1.17.0-beta1 Please help test, and thanks to all contributors!
