Re: Mono-D v0.4.1.2 - Heavily improved performance + Completion bugs removed
On 24/08/2012 00:18, alex wrote: Hi everyone, Right after the GSoC finished (I'm really sure I passed :)), I've just found more time to improve things drastically: I also have to extend my congratulations for the work you have done. I tried Mono-D several releases ago (before Summmer), and even then it was already very good in its semantic functionality (autocomplete etc.). It was the only D IDE to come anywhere close to what DDT and Descent had in terms of semantic functionality (sorry VisualD and others :P ), and even more, it actually didn't just come close but actually surpassed it significantly! -- Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
Re: Mono-D v0.4.1.2 - Heavily improved performance + Completion bugs removed
On Friday, 24 August 2012 at 02:40:43 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 01:18:25 +0200
"alex" wrote:
class D : C!(A!int.SubClass) { } // is not allowed, but A!int
is -- why?
IIRC, I've had problems doing anything complex in a no-paren
template
parameter. I always figured if you're doing no-parens, it had
to be a
single token (Maybe I'm wrong?). Does it work if you do this?:
A!(int.SubClass)
It's working just with the subclass marked as static and without
any further template paramters, not with A!(int.SubClass) but
with A!int.SubClass :)
Re: Mono-D v0.4.1.2 - Heavily improved performance + Completion bugs removed
On Friday, 24 August 2012 at 00:10:03 UTC, Piotr Szturmaj wrote: F i L wrote: http://i3.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/004/128/BRILLIANT_.jpg Great work as always, Alex :D Yes! This is really good project! :) Thanks :D
Re: Mono-D v0.4.1.2 - Heavily improved performance + Completion bugs removed
IIRC, I've had problems doing anything complex in a no-paren template parameter. I always figured if you're doing no-parens, it had to be a single token (Maybe I'm wrong?). Does it work if you do this?: A!(int.SubClass) primitive or identifier, iirc
Re: Mono-D v0.4.1.2 - Heavily improved performance + Completion bugs removed
On 2012-08-24 01:18, alex wrote:
Hi everyone,
Right after the GSoC finished (I'm really sure I passed :)), I've just
found more time to improve things drastically:
By using a nice combination of storing AST children both sorted by name
in a dictionary and in normal list, I was able to increase the
resolution performance extremely - that means it takes ~0.3 milliseconds
instead of ~3ms to resolve a normal symbol like a local variable or a
local class definition.
As a side effect, UFCS completion and preparation right after startup
gained a maximum of performance boost! Tooltips and (later on) semantic
highlighting could be done even more faster :)
Then I fixed several issues with template parameter deduction - and
figured out several bugs or a kinda undefined behaviour of dmd:
class A(T) {
class SubClass {}
}
class C(U: A!W.SubClass, W){}
class D : C!(A!int.SubClass) { } // is not allowed, but A!int is -- why?
Furthermore I fixed the parameter completion on this() and super()
expressions, what implies a great usability bonus imho. Not to forget
all the classic null-check issues and smaller bugs.
That sounds great. I think it's time I give Mono-D a try.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
Re: Mono-D v0.4.1.2 - Heavily improved performance + Completion bugs removed
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 01:18:25 +0200
"alex" wrote:
>
> class D : C!(A!int.SubClass) { } // is not allowed, but A!int is
> -- why?
>
IIRC, I've had problems doing anything complex in a no-paren template
parameter. I always figured if you're doing no-parens, it had to be a
single token (Maybe I'm wrong?). Does it work if you do this?:
A!(int.SubClass)
Re: Mono-D v0.4.1.2 - Heavily improved performance + Completion bugs removed
F i L wrote: http://i3.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/004/128/BRILLIANT_.jpg Great work as always, Alex :D Yes! This is really good project! :)
Re: Mono-D v0.4.1.2 - Heavily improved performance + Completion bugs removed
http://i3.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/004/128/BRILLIANT_.jpg Great work as always, Alex :D
Re: Mono-D v0.4.1.2 - Heavily improved performance + Completion bugs removed
On Thursday, 23 August 2012 at 23:23:39 UTC, Piotr Szturmaj wrote:
alex wrote:
Then I fixed several issues with template parameter deduction
- and
figured out several bugs or a kinda undefined behaviour of dmd:
class A(T) {
class SubClass {}
}
class C(U: A!W.SubClass, W){}
class D : C!(A!int.SubClass) { } // is not allowed, but A!int
is -- why?
try marking SubClass with static keyword.
This works indeed, but nervertheless not for templated sub
classes like
... { static class SubClass(U) {} }
Re: Mono-D v0.4.1.2 - Heavily improved performance + Completion bugs removed
alex wrote:
Then I fixed several issues with template parameter deduction - and
figured out several bugs or a kinda undefined behaviour of dmd:
class A(T) {
class SubClass {}
}
class C(U: A!W.SubClass, W){}
class D : C!(A!int.SubClass) { } // is not allowed, but A!int is -- why?
try marking SubClass with static keyword.
