Re: dmd 1.049 and 2.034 release
Walter Bright Wrote: > Rainer Schuetze wrote: > > Hi, > > > > the problem is related to a change that was probably done to improve > > > > http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1170 > > > > see my comments there for more details. > > I checked into svn a compiler change folding in your patch. Can you try > it out with QtD? I commented on this in the bugzilla on #1170, that I tested QtD with dmd rev 205 yesterday, and it compiles fine. Thank you for separate commits!
Re: dmd 1.049 and 2.034 release
Walter Bright, el 13 de octubre a las 14:16 me escribiste: > Rainer Schuetze wrote: > >Hi, > > > >the problem is related to a change that was probably done to improve > > > >http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1170 > > > >see my comments there for more details. > > I checked into svn a compiler change folding in your patch. Can you > try it out with QtD? Thanks for the small commits :) BTW, unless you're planning to skip DMD 2.035, I think you increased the DMD 2 version accidentally to 2.036 ;) -- Leandro Lucarella (AKA luca) http://llucax.com.ar/ -- GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145 104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05) -- Yeah, I'm a great quitter. It's one of the few things I do well. I come from a long line of quitters. My father was a quitter, my grandfather was a quitter... I was raised to give up. -- George Constanza
Re: dmd 1.049 and 2.034 release
Rainer Schuetze wrote: Hi, the problem is related to a change that was probably done to improve http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1170 see my comments there for more details. I checked into svn a compiler change folding in your patch. Can you try it out with QtD?
Re: dmd 1.049 and 2.034 release
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html The link within "Download latest D 2.0 alpha D compiler for Win32 and x86 linux" is still pointing to 2.027. Ali
Re: dmd 1.049 and 2.034 release
On 2009-10-13 01:56:11 +0200, Moritz Warning said:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:29:06 -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Moritz Warning" wrote in message
news:hb01mo$23g...@digitalmars.com...
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:53:28 -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Moritz Warning" wrote in message
news:havc43$9a...@digitalmars.com...
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 21:43:36 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
[..]
If you're using tango trunk,
then I don't know what the problem is either...
It's trunk.
Maybe this?:
http://www.dsource.org/projects/tango/forums/topic/809
No, this is the first error:
/home/mwarning/trunk/build/runtime/../../runtime/common/tango/core/
Thread.d(659): Error: e2ir: cannot cast from tango.core.Thread.Thread to
void*
/home/mwarning/trunk/build/runtime/../../runtime/common/tango/core/
Thread.d(659): Error: e2ir: cannot cast from tango.core.Thread.Thread to
void*
Though, these cases work:
class Foo{}
Foo foo = new Foo();
auto x = cast(void*) foo;
A{ void* x(){ return cast(void*)this; } }
yet that is a strange error, I was not really able to reduce it, on one
side it is clearly a compiler error
(it does not allow cast(void*)this which is valid), on the other all
smaller cases that I could think of seem to work...
submitted it as
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3392
Fawzi
Re: dmd 1.049 and 2.034 release
Rainer Schuetze wrote: Hi, the problem is related to a change that was probably done to improve http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1170 see my comments there for more details. Yeah, makes sense.
Re: dmd 1.049 and 2.034 release
Hi, the problem is related to a change that was probably done to improve http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1170 see my comments there for more details. Rainer Eldar Insafutdinov Wrote: > Walter Bright Wrote: > > > Eldar Insafutdinov wrote: > > > Despite the application of #3301 patch that fixed compilation of QtD, > > > the new release introduces a new regression, that causes the compiler > > > to hang while compiling it. This release therefore remains broken. > > > > What's the bugilla entry? > > I haven't put my hands onto creating a testcase. QtD is very big amount of > modules with the pretty uniform code. Some modules import up to 60 other > modules. It's difficult to create a testcase out of this, especially as in > case of last regressions, which were about module imports.
Re: dmd 1.049 and 2.034 release
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:29:06 -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "Moritz Warning" wrote in message
> news:hb01mo$23g...@digitalmars.com...
>> On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:53:28 -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>>
>>> "Moritz Warning" wrote in message
>>> news:havc43$9a...@digitalmars.com...
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 21:43:36 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
>> [..]
>>> If you're using tango trunk,
>>> then I don't know what the problem is either...
>>
>> It's trunk.
>
> Maybe this?:
> http://www.dsource.org/projects/tango/forums/topic/809
No, this is the first error:
/home/mwarning/trunk/build/runtime/../../runtime/common/tango/core/
Thread.d(659): Error: e2ir: cannot cast from tango.core.Thread.Thread to
void*
/home/mwarning/trunk/build/runtime/../../runtime/common/tango/core/
Thread.d(659): Error: e2ir: cannot cast from tango.core.Thread.Thread to
void*
Though, these cases work:
class Foo{}
Foo foo = new Foo();
auto x = cast(void*) foo;
A{ void* x(){ return cast(void*)this; } }
Re: dmd 1.049 and 2.034 release
"Moritz Warning" wrote in message news:hb01mo$23g...@digitalmars.com... > On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:53:28 -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote: > >> "Moritz Warning" wrote in message >> news:havc43$9a...@digitalmars.com... >>> On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 21:43:36 -0700, Walter Bright wrote: >>> > [..] >> If you're using tango trunk, >> then I don't know what the problem is either... > > It's trunk. Maybe this?: http://www.dsource.org/projects/tango/forums/topic/809
Re: dmd 1.049 and 2.034 release
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:53:28 -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote: > "Moritz Warning" wrote in message > news:havc43$9a...@digitalmars.com... >> On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 21:43:36 -0700, Walter Bright wrote: >> [..] > If you're using tango trunk, > then I don't know what the problem is either... It's trunk.
Re: dmd 1.049 and 2.034 release
"Moritz Warning" wrote in message news:havc43$9a...@digitalmars.com... > On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 21:43:36 -0700, Walter Bright wrote: > >> Folding in patches to compiler faults from bugzilla. >> >> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html >> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.049.zip >> >> >> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html >> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.034.zip >> >> Many thanks to the numerous people who contributed to this update. > > Thanks to Walter and those who contributed all those numerous patches. > > But Tango is still broken due to regressions (since 1.047?). > Maybe someone can take look into this. Are you using Tango 0.99.8 or trunk? If you're using 0.99.8 then it's because DMD 1.044 had some sort of breaking change which Tango did make an adjustment to work with, but that was after 0.99.8 came out and they still have yet to put out a new release. If you're using tango trunk, then I don't know what the problem is either...
Re: dmd 1.049 and 2.034 release
Walter Bright Wrote: > Eldar Insafutdinov wrote: > > Despite the application of #3301 patch that fixed compilation of QtD, > > the new release introduces a new regression, that causes the compiler > > to hang while compiling it. This release therefore remains broken. > > What's the bugilla entry? I haven't put my hands onto creating a testcase. QtD is very big amount of modules with the pretty uniform code. Some modules import up to 60 other modules. It's difficult to create a testcase out of this, especially as in case of last regressions, which were about module imports.
Re: dmd 1.049 and 2.034 release
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:24:38 -0700, Walter Bright wrote: > Moritz Warning wrote: >> But Tango is still broken due to regressions (since 1.047?). > > What's the bugzilla entry? I don't know what the regressions are exactly. It looks like a few different regressions to me. Unfortunately, I'm short of time. So someone else has to check it out.
Re: dmd 1.049 and 2.034 release
Moritz Warning wrote: But Tango is still broken due to regressions (since 1.047?). What's the bugzilla entry?
Re: dmd 1.049 and 2.034 release
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote: Despite the application of #3301 patch that fixed compilation of QtD, the new release introduces a new regression, that causes the compiler to hang while compiling it. This release therefore remains broken. What's the bugilla entry?
Re: dmd 1.049 and 2.034 release
On 2009-10-12 06:43:36 +0200, Walter Bright said: Folding in patches to compiler faults from bugzilla. http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.049.zip http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.034.zip Many thanks to the numerous people who contributed to this update. Thanks to all involved for the nice stream of bugfixes!
Re: dmd 1.049 and 2.034 release
Walter Bright Wrote: > Folding in patches to compiler faults from bugzilla. > > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html > http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.049.zip > > > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html > http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.034.zip > > Many thanks to the numerous people who contributed to this update. Despite the application of #3301 patch that fixed compilation of QtD, the new release introduces a new regression, that causes the compiler to hang while compiling it. This release therefore remains broken.
Re: dmd 1.049 and 2.034 release
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 21:43:36 -0700, Walter Bright wrote: > Folding in patches to compiler faults from bugzilla. > > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html > http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.049.zip > > > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html > http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.034.zip > > Many thanks to the numerous people who contributed to this update. Thanks to Walter and those who contributed all those numerous patches. But Tango is still broken due to regressions (since 1.047?). Maybe someone can take look into this.
Re: dmd 1.049 and 2.034 release
Walter Bright Wrote: > Folding in patches to compiler faults from bugzilla. > > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html > http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.049.zip > > > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html > http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.034.zip > > Many thanks to the numerous people who contributed to this update. Wow ! Huge thanks for fixing bug #258 ! I was going to rewrite all my code.
Re: dmd 1.049 and 2.034 release
Ary Borenszweig wrote: Don wrote: Walter Bright wrote: Folding in patches to compiler faults from bugzilla. http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.049.zip http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.034.zip Many thanks to the numerous people who contributed to this update. A small milestone -- This release fixes the last remaining compiler segfaults and internal compiler errors from DStress. This will probably be the last "stability release" -- there aren't many ICE bugs left in Bugzilla. Cool!! Where is DStress so I can download it? I might want to run tests against it with Descent (we did that in the past but with an older implementation it's no longer in use). http://www.dsource.org/projects/dstress Part of my motivation for fixing the crashing bugs was knowing how important it is for IDEs.
Re: dmd 1.049 and 2.034 release
Don wrote: Walter Bright wrote: Folding in patches to compiler faults from bugzilla. http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.049.zip http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.034.zip Many thanks to the numerous people who contributed to this update. A small milestone -- This release fixes the last remaining compiler segfaults and internal compiler errors from DStress. This will probably be the last "stability release" -- there aren't many ICE bugs left in Bugzilla. Cool!! Where is DStress so I can download it? I might want to run tests against it with Descent (we did that in the past but with an older implementation it's no longer in use).
Re: dmd 1.049 and 2.034 release
Walter Bright wrote: Folding in patches to compiler faults from bugzilla. http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.049.zip http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.034.zip Many thanks to the numerous people who contributed to this update. A small milestone -- This release fixes the last remaining compiler segfaults and internal compiler errors from DStress. This will probably be the last "stability release" -- there aren't many ICE bugs left in Bugzilla.
Re: dmd 1.049 and 2.034 release
Jeremie Pelletier wrote: What already? Seems like 2.033 was only a week ago.. oh wait. It was only a week ago!
Re: dmd 1.049 and 2.034 release
Walter Bright wrote: Folding in patches to compiler faults from bugzilla. http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.049.zip http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.034.zip Many thanks to the numerous people who contributed to this update. What already? Seems like 2.033 was only a week ago.. oh wait.
