Re: unit-threaded v0.6.13 - tags, autotags and support for integration tests

2016-05-17 Thread Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce

On 05/17/2016 10:22 AM, Meta wrote:

On Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 09:54:15 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:

You surely mean "used to be destroy", right?


Good question... If I write this:

struct Test
{
 ~this() { writeln("destroying Test"); }
}

with (Test())
{
 //Do stuff
}

Will Test's destructor be run once we exit the `with` scope?


Should.


Re: unit-threaded v0.6.13 - tags, autotags and support for integration tests

2016-05-17 Thread Marc Schütz via Digitalmars-d-announce

On Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 14:22:51 UTC, Meta wrote:

On Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 09:54:15 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:

You surely mean "used to be destroy", right?


Good question... If I write this:

struct Test
{
~this() { writeln("destroying Test"); }
}

with (Test())
{
//Do stuff
}

Will Test's destructor be run once we exit the `with` scope?


Yes, it was fixed almost two years ago:

https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/3855


Re: unit-threaded v0.6.13 - tags, autotags and support for integration tests

2016-05-17 Thread Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d-announce

On Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 14:22:51 UTC, Meta wrote:

On Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 09:54:15 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:

You surely mean "used to be destroy", right?


Good question... If I write this:

struct Test
{
~this() { writeln("destroying Test"); }
}

with (Test())
{
//Do stuff
}

Will Test's destructor be run once we exit the `with` scope?


It did for me on the latest release.

Atila


Re: unit-threaded v0.6.13 - tags, autotags and support for integration tests

2016-05-17 Thread Meta via Digitalmars-d-announce

On Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 09:54:15 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:

You surely mean "used to be destroy", right?


Good question... If I write this:

struct Test
{
~this() { writeln("destroying Test"); }
}

with (Test())
{
//Do stuff
}

Will Test's destructor be run once we exit the `with` scope?


Re: unit-threaded v0.6.13 - tags, autotags and support for integration tests

2016-05-17 Thread Marc Schütz via Digitalmars-d-announce

On Monday, 16 May 2016 at 14:39:22 UTC, Meta wrote:

On Monday, 16 May 2016 at 08:37:48 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:

with(immutable Sandbox()) {
writeFile("foo.txt", "foobarbaz\ntoto"); // can also pass 
string[] for lines

shouldExist("foo.txt");
shouldNotExist("bar.txt");
shouldEqualLines("foo.txt", ["foobarbaz", "toto"]);
}


That's a really neat trick and an interesting use of `with`. I 
remember that variables initialized in the argument list of 
`with` used to not be destroyed after exiting the scope, I'm 
guessing that's not the case anymore? I vaguely remember a PR 
that fixed that.


You surely mean "used to be destroy", right? Yes, that's been 
fixed.




Anyway, congratulations on the new release!





Re: unit-threaded v0.6.13 - tags, autotags and support for integration tests

2016-05-16 Thread Meta via Digitalmars-d-announce

On Monday, 16 May 2016 at 08:37:48 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:

with(immutable Sandbox()) {
writeFile("foo.txt", "foobarbaz\ntoto"); // can also pass 
string[] for lines

shouldExist("foo.txt");
shouldNotExist("bar.txt");
shouldEqualLines("foo.txt", ["foobarbaz", "toto"]);
}


That's a really neat trick and an interesting use of `with`. I 
remember that variables initialized in the argument list of 
`with` used to not be destroyed after exiting the scope, I'm 
guessing that's not the case anymore? I vaguely remember a PR 
that fixed that.


Anyway, congratulations on the new release!