Re: dmd 1.071 and 2.056 release
+1
Re: dmd 1.071 and 2.056 release
On 26/10/2011 19:34, Walter Bright wrote: snip http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html snip Version D 2.056 Sep 10, 2011 New/Changed Features Druntime Bugs Fixed Library Bugs Fixed DMD Bugs Fixed ??? Stewart.
Re: dmd 1.071 and 2.056 release
I'm only saddened that my std.socket cleanup pull request[1] wasn't merged, despite being ready for merging for over a month of inactivity. Vladimir, What's new and different in your std.sockets. Should I be using it for the native MySQL client? Steve
Re: dmd 1.071 and 2.056 release
On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 17:44:22 +0200, Steve Teale steve.te...@britseyeview.com wrote: What's new and different in your std.sockets. There's a list in this post: http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/Clean-up_of_std.socket_144324.html Should I be using it for the native MySQL client? If you use name lookup in your code, you should probably switch to the new API when the next DMD comes out. -- Best regards, Vladimirmailto:vladi...@thecybershadow.net
Re: dmd 1.071 and 2.056 release
On 27.10.2011 08:48, Jacob Carlborg wrote: On 2011-10-26 20:34, Walter Bright wrote: 100 bugs fixed! http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.071.zip http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.056.zip Impressive as always. I noticed there seem to be a couple of D2 related fixes in the D1 changelog: Bugzilla 6073: Cannot pass __traits(parent, ...) as a template parameter if it is a module Then there are a couple of fixes related to regressions for D2, don't know if they apply to D1 as well, just look for Regression(2.0xy). They do apply. In every case, some code was modified on the D1 compiler. Not all of the test cases apply to D1 though (sometimes there are bugs in the compiler internals, where we don't have a D1 test case that triggers them).
Re: dmd 1.071 and 2.056 release
On 10/30/2011 11:01 PM, Don wrote: They do apply. In every case, some code was modified on the D1 compiler. Not all of the test cases apply to D1 though (sometimes there are bugs in the compiler internals, where we don't have a D1 test case that triggers them). Just to chime in, whenever I fix a bug in D2 I check to see if it is applicable to D1, and merge the patch into D1 if it is.
Re: dmd 1.071 and 2.056 release
On 2011-10-31 07:01, Don wrote: On 27.10.2011 08:48, Jacob Carlborg wrote: On 2011-10-26 20:34, Walter Bright wrote: 100 bugs fixed! http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.071.zip http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.056.zip Impressive as always. I noticed there seem to be a couple of D2 related fixes in the D1 changelog: Bugzilla 6073: Cannot pass __traits(parent, ...) as a template parameter if it is a module Then there are a couple of fixes related to regressions for D2, don't know if they apply to D1 as well, just look for Regression(2.0xy). They do apply. In every case, some code was modified on the D1 compiler. Not all of the test cases apply to D1 though (sometimes there are bugs in the compiler internals, where we don't have a D1 test case that triggers them). Ok, I see. -- /Jacob Carlborg
Re: dmd 1.071 and 2.056 release
On 10/27/11 5:16 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote: On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 21:34:35 +0300, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote: 100 bugs fixed! I'm only saddened that my std.socket cleanup pull request[1] wasn't merged, despite being ready for merging for over a month of inactivity. That's a few more months for my open-source network code not building with a stock DMD. Oh well, I guess I'll move the new std.socket to my network library if it comes to that. [1]: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/260 Let's make sure we review and pull that in soon. Andrei
Re: dmd 1.071 and 2.056 release
On 10/26/11 4:25 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote: On Wednesday, October 26, 2011 14:20 Nick Sabalausky wrote: http://www.d-programming-language.org/phobos/std_string.html Have the docs just not been updated yet, or did I do something wrong in the doc comments for my std.string changes? It's Andrei that manages the site, whereas Walter does the dmd release, and it's been less than 3 hours since the release, so I expect that Andrei hasn't had the chance to update the site yet. - Jonathan M Davis Site updated. Andrei
Re: dmd 1.071 and 2.056 release
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote in message news:j8c7gj$2ctn$2...@digitalmars.com... On 10/27/2011 7:00 AM, Mike James wrote: Yeh, a simple app I've written has gone from 514k to 1098k in release. Where has all the extra 'goodness' come from :-O Take a look at the .map file (run dmc with -map). It'll tell you where the size comes from. More interestingly if you open up the executable in a hex editor there are huge chunks of the .exe padded with zeros... -=mike=-
Re: dmd 1.071 and 2.056 release
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 11:42:33 +0300, Mike James f...@bar.com wrote: More interestingly if you open up the executable in a hex editor there are huge chunks of the .exe padded with zeros... Most likely related to this issue: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2254 -- Best regards, Vladimirmailto:vladi...@thecybershadow.net
Re: dmd 1.071 and 2.056 release
On 2011-10-26 20:34, Walter Bright wrote: 100 bugs fixed! http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.071.zip http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.056.zip Impressive as always. I noticed there seem to be a couple of D2 related fixes in the D1 changelog: Bugzilla 6073: Cannot pass __traits(parent, ...) as a template parameter if it is a module Then there are a couple of fixes related to regressions for D2, don't know if they apply to D1 as well, just look for Regression(2.0xy). -- /Jacob Carlborg
Re: dmd 1.071 and 2.056 release
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 21:34:35 +0300, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote: 100 bugs fixed! I'm only saddened that my std.socket cleanup pull request[1] wasn't merged, despite being ready for merging for over a month of inactivity. That's a few more months for my open-source network code not building with a stock DMD. Oh well, I guess I'll move the new std.socket to my network library if it comes to that. [1]: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/260 -- Best regards, Vladimirmailto:vladi...@thecybershadow.net
Re: dmd 1.071 and 2.056 release
John Chapman j...@ch.com wrote in message news:j8a00m$176m$1...@digitalmars.com... Anyone else experience slow compiles? Seems about 2-3 times slower than 2.055. Also, resulting executables are nearly twice as large on Windows. John. Yeh, a simple app I've written has gone from 514k to 1098k in release. Where has all the extra 'goodness' come from :-O -=mike=-
Re: dmd 1.071 and 2.056 release
On 10/27/2011 3:16 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote: I'm only saddened that my std.socket cleanup pull request[1] wasn't merged, despite being ready for merging for over a month of inactivity. That's a few more months for my open-source network code not building with a stock DMD. Oh well, I guess I'll move the new std.socket to my network library if it comes to that. [1]: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/260 Sorry about that. There are still a lot of great outstanding pull requests. There's nothing dramatic that marked this release, it's simply that enough was pulled to justify putting out a release.
Re: dmd 1.071 and 2.056 release
On 10/27/2011 7:00 AM, Mike James wrote: Yeh, a simple app I've written has gone from 514k to 1098k in release. Where has all the extra 'goodness' come from :-O Take a look at the .map file (run dmc with -map). It'll tell you where the size comes from.
Re: dmd 1.071 and 2.056 release
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 14:20:09 -0400, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote: On 10/27/2011 3:16 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote: I'm only saddened that my std.socket cleanup pull request[1] wasn't merged, despite being ready for merging for over a month of inactivity. That's a few more months for my open-source network code not building with a stock DMD. Oh well, I guess I'll move the new std.socket to my network library if it comes to that. [1]: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/260 Sorry about that. There are still a lot of great outstanding pull requests. There's nothing dramatic that marked this release, it's simply that enough was pulled to justify putting out a release. *ahem* inout working? -Steve
Re: dmd 1.071 and 2.056 release
- Using --build-only, by default, places the exe in the current directory rather than the usual tmp directory. The --build-only option is frequently (always, AFAIK) used like an alternate to bud/rebuild/xfbuild/etc Yep, build-only should be the default! And running the exe afterwards an option.
Re: dmd 1.071 and 2.056 release
This is the only section that seem to have a big difference in length: 2.055: Length Name Class 00071CAEH _TEXT CODE 32-bit 2.056: Length Name Class 00101A1AH _TEXT CODE 32-bit Hurray, template bloat ;)
Re: dmd 1.071 and 2.056 release
On 10/27/2011 12:27 PM, Trass3r wrote: Hurray, template bloat ;) Actually, likely not. I did make a change reduced the granularity of the object files (multiobj). If that's the source of the large size increase, I need to revisit that.
Re: dmd 1.071 and 2.056 release
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:30:16 +0300, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote: Actually, likely not. I did make a change reduced the granularity of the object files (multiobj). If that's the source of the large size increase, I need to revisit that. What are the benefits of reducing smart linkage granularity? -- Best regards, Vladimirmailto:vladi...@thecybershadow.net
Re: dmd 1.071 and 2.056 release
On 10/27/2011 1:48 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote: On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:30:16 +0300, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote: Actually, likely not. I did make a change reduced the granularity of the object files (multiobj). If that's the source of the large size increase, I need to revisit that. What are the benefits of reducing smart linkage granularity? Fixing a bug where static ctors/dtors needed to be referenced by the ModuleInfo.
Re: dmd 1.071 and 2.056 release
On 10/27/11, Trass3r u...@known.com wrote: Hurray, template bloat ;) You bet. And I thought I was clever writing all those templates. The linker flashed me internals just recently, that's a sure sign it's had enough templates for one day. lol.
dmd 1.071 and 2.056 release
100 bugs fixed! http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.071.zip http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.056.zip
Re: dmd 1.071 and 2.056 release
This is the first release in a while that hasn't broken any of my code. Yay!
Re: dmd 1.071 and 2.056 release
Great release :) Although it's not in the changelog (I didn't even think to check for it there until now), there's a bunch of RDMD issues fixed too: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/tools/pull/14 (Don't pass .di files to DMD.) This fixes a problem that frequently made RDMD fail to work on projects that import a static lib and .di files. Real-world examples of the problem are here: http://www.dsource.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5856 http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/programming-9/d-is-d-programming-language-just-too-much-898862/#post4452127 https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/tools/pull/14 (rdmd fixes) This is killer pull request from CyberShadow, improving a number of things: - Fixes usage of rdmd by multiple users on the same Posix system. - Using --build-only, by default, places the exe in the current directory rather than the usual tmp directory. The --build-only option is frequently (always, AFAIK) used like an alternate to bud/rebuild/xfbuild/etc, so this default makes much more sense. - RDMD should now work within VisualD - Don't append a second extension to -of path on Windows - A couple of things that had been fixed in an old pre-github patch, but failed to get applied correctly (thank god we're on github now!!): 1. Don't mistake .map filenames as the .d file to build. 2. Don't use std.getopt.config.stopOnFirstNonOption. As CyberShadow says: rdmd already scans the command line to find the point where option parsing should stop. Including this getopt option breaks using rdmd with e.g. DMD's -map option.
Re: dmd 1.071 and 2.056 release
http://www.d-programming-language.org/phobos/std_string.html Have the docs just not been updated yet, or did I do something wrong in the doc comments for my std.string changes?
Re: dmd 1.071 and 2.056 release
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote in message news:mailman.517.1319656575.24802.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com... This is the first release in a while that hasn't broken any of my code. Yay! It broke one thing in mine...but that's just because I was accidentally doing something that violated immutable and DMD didn't catch it until now. So Yay! from here, too :)
Re: dmd 1.071 and 2.056 release
On Wednesday, October 26, 2011 14:20 Nick Sabalausky wrote: http://www.d-programming-language.org/phobos/std_string.html Have the docs just not been updated yet, or did I do something wrong in the doc comments for my std.string changes? It's Andrei that manages the site, whereas Walter does the dmd release, and it's been less than 3 hours since the release, so I expect that Andrei hasn't had the chance to update the site yet. - Jonathan M Davis
Re: dmd 1.071 and 2.056 release
Anyone else experience slow compiles? Seems about 2-3 times slower than 2.055. Also, resulting executables are nearly twice as large on Windows. John.
Re: dmd 1.071 and 2.056 release
On 10/26/11, Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote: Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote in message news:mailman.517.1319656575.24802.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com... This is the first release in a while that hasn't broken any of my code. Yay! It broke one thing in mine...but that's just because I was accidentally doing something that violated immutable and DMD didn't catch it until now. So Yay! from here, too :) Actually I had one little problem, that outdated Gdi32 import lib. I quickly replaced it with a new one though. I hope we can start putting newer import libs into future DMD releases, there are several projects out there that depend on it (DGUI and maybe even DWT, I think they both distribute import libs).
Re: dmd 1.071 and 2.056 release
On 10/27/11, John Chapman j...@ch.com wrote: Anyone else experience slow compiles? Seems about 2-3 times slower than 2.055. So far I'm getting only slightly slower builds (on the order of +100 msecs), but it does seem to be consistently slower. Also, resulting executables are nearly twice as large on Windows. On one of my apps: 2.055: no flags: 545 kb -g: 1567 kb 2.056: no flags: 1115 kb -g: 2143 kb I thought -g was to blame but they've doubled regardless.
