Re: mir.complex
On Monday, 30 August 2021 at 13:26:09 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote: [snip] Why wasn't fixing the linking bugs considered an alternative to forking std.complex? What are the other remaining reasons for not using std.complex? It doesn't look like any bug reports were filed. Hopefully that can happen...
Re: mir.complex
On Friday, 20 August 2021 at 17:02:33 UTC, 9il wrote: There are few reasons. The main one is that linking bugs caused by a compiler mangling/generation bugs makes std.complex unusable for us. Initially I have updated all packages with std.complex, however it failed to link in a private project. Why wasn't fixing the linking bugs considered an alternative to forking std.complex? What are the other remaining reasons for not using std.complex?
Re: mir.complex
On Friday, 20 August 2021 at 17:03:52 UTC, 9il wrote: On Friday, 20 August 2021 at 16:55:57 UTC, David Gileadi wrote: On 8/20/21 9:54 AM, Dennis wrote: On Friday, 20 August 2021 at 16:44:53 UTC, 9il wrote: Builtin complex numbers have been replaced with mir.complex in the following packages: Out of curiosity, how did std.complex fall short? Maybe it was too complex? Sorry, I'll see myself out. Yes, it was hard to make std.complex works. This is starting to get too real for me ***runs away***
Re: mir.complex
On Friday, 20 August 2021 at 16:55:57 UTC, David Gileadi wrote: On 8/20/21 9:54 AM, Dennis wrote: On Friday, 20 August 2021 at 16:44:53 UTC, 9il wrote: Builtin complex numbers have been replaced with mir.complex in the following packages: Out of curiosity, how did std.complex fall short? Maybe it was too complex? Sorry, I'll see myself out. Yes, it was hard to make std.complex works.
Re: mir.complex
On Friday, 20 August 2021 at 16:54:07 UTC, Dennis wrote: On Friday, 20 August 2021 at 16:44:53 UTC, 9il wrote: Builtin complex numbers have been replaced with mir.complex in the following packages: Out of curiosity, how did std.complex fall short? There are few reasons. The main one is that linking bugs caused by a compiler mangling/generation bugs makes std.complex unusable for us. Initially I have updated all packages with std.complex, however it failed to link in a private project.
Re: mir.complex
On 8/20/21 9:54 AM, Dennis wrote: On Friday, 20 August 2021 at 16:44:53 UTC, 9il wrote: Builtin complex numbers have been replaced with mir.complex in the following packages: Out of curiosity, how did std.complex fall short? Maybe it was too complex? Sorry, I'll see myself out.
Re: mir.complex
On Friday, 20 August 2021 at 16:44:53 UTC, 9il wrote: Builtin complex numbers have been replaced with mir.complex in the following packages: Out of curiosity, how did std.complex fall short?
mir.complex
mir.complex [1] has been added to mir-core v1.1.80 Builtin complex numbers have been replaced with mir.complex in the following packages: - cblas, - lapack - mir-blas - mir-lapack - lubeck [1] http://mir-core.libmir.org/mir_complex.html MRs are welcome. Kind regards, Ilya
