[Issue 3402] Please bring back canFind in std.algorithm
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3402 Max Samukha samu...@voliacable.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||samu...@voliacable.com --- Comment #2 from Max Samukha samu...@voliacable.com 2009-10-14 23:39:33 PDT --- It is. But a note in the docs would be nice. An example would be enough: // Checking if the element can be found in the range assert(find(a, 5).empty); -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3401] Compiler crash on invariant + method overload
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3401 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au OS/Version|Linux |All Severity|normal |regression -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3401] Segfault(expression.c) on invariant + method overload
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3401 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Compiler crash on invariant |Segfault(expression.c) on |+ method overload |invariant + method overload --- Comment #2 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2009-10-15 01:57:40 PDT --- Crashing in VarExp::VarExp(). var is NULL. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3401] Segfault(expression.c) on invariant + method overload
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3401
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #3 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2009-10-15 02:07:03 PDT ---
func.c, line 1568 (DMD 1.050), in mergeFensure(): Need to check fdensure as
well as fensure.
FuncDeclaration *fdv = (FuncDeclaration *)foverrides.data[i];
sf = fdv-mergeFensure(sf);
-if (fdv-fensure)
+if (fdv-fensure fdv-fdensure)
{
//printf(fdv-fensure: %s\n, fdv-fensure-toChars());
// Make the call: __ensure(result)
Expression *eresult = NULL;
Likewise in mergeFrequire, line 1524 should probably be:
FuncDeclaration *fdv = (FuncDeclaration *)foverrides.data[i];
sf = fdv-mergeFrequire(sf);
-if (fdv-frequire)
+if (fdv-frequire fdv-fdrequire)
{
//printf(fdv-frequire: %s\n, fdv-frequire-toChars());
/* Make the call:
* try { __require(); }
* catch { frequire; }
*/
Expression *eresult = NULL;
Expression *e = new CallExp(loc, new VarExp(loc, fdv-fdrequire),
eresult);
Statement *s2 = new ExpStatement(loc, e);
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3397] Unintended function call to static opCall
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3397 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- Comment #1 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-10-15 02:29:09 PDT --- Why is it a blocker if using stack.pop() works? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3404] New: JSON output should retain original alias names
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3404
Summary: JSON output should retain original alias names
Product: D
Version: 1.050
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: a...@esperanto.org.ar
--- Comment #0 from Ary Borenszweig a...@esperanto.org.ar 2009-10-15 02:54:38
PDT ---
For this input:
---
module main;
alias int myInt;
myInt x;
---
The JSON output is:
---
{
name : main,
kind : module,
file : main.d,
members : [
{
name : myInt,
kind : alias,
type : int,
line : 5}
,{
name : x,
kind : variable,
type : int,
line : 7}
]
}
---
But the last one should be:
---
{
name : x,
kind : variable,
type : myInt,
line : 7}
---
That is, aliases should not be forgotten. This is especially important for
binding libraries where aliases are heavily used.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3397] Unintended function call to static opCall
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3397 --- Comment #3 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-10-15 03:12:12 PDT --- I've checked in a fix to this one, but not 3367. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 2479] Badcode regression: closure corrupts _argptr value
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2479
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Phobos |DMD
Summary|sformat is broken |Badcode regression: closure
||corrupts _argptr value
--- Comment #5 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2009-10-15 05:21:36 PDT ---
Reduced test case. This does not seem to be a Phobos bug.
If you remove any reference to s from the delegate (so that it stops being a
closure), the code works correctly.
void doFormat(void delegate() myputc, void * argptr){
assert(!(*cast(string*)argptr is null));
}
void sformat(string s, ...){
void putc() { assert(s[0]==s[0]); }
doFormat(putc, _argptr);
}
void main(){
sformat(xxx, hi);
}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 2479] Badcode regression: closure corrupts _argptr value
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2479 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 2852] Cannot pass temporary result by reference (regression)
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2852 --- Comment #3 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2009-10-15 05:25:26 PDT --- This is the same as bug 3167. Although this report is older, it's the later one which Walter commented on. So I'm closing this one. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3167] Passing result of a function call as ref argument no longer works
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3167 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||2kor...@gmail.com --- Comment #9 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2009-10-15 05:27:05 PDT --- *** Issue 2852 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3405] New: DMD crashes during compilation
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3405 Summary: DMD crashes during compilation Product: D Version: 1.050 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com ReportedBy: m...@krej.cz --- Comment #0 from Martin Krejcirik m...@krej.cz 2009-10-15 13:41:19 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=473) source files DMD crashes when trying to compile attached program. Extract the zip and run crash.bat. I was not able to find out the exact cause of this problem, but it does compile, when you change the order of source files. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3405] DMD crashes during compilation
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3405 Moritz Warning moritzwarn...@web.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||moritzwarn...@web.de --- Comment #1 from Moritz Warning moritzwarn...@web.de 2009-10-15 14:02:41 PDT --- @Martin: Remove the invariant scope and it will compile. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3405] DMD crashes during compilation
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3405 Moritz Warning moritzwarn...@web.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Moritz Warning moritzwarn...@web.de 2009-10-15 14:03:32 PDT --- *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 3401 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3406] New: [tdpl] Cannot compile Hello, world or even less with -safe
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3406
Summary: [tdpl] Cannot compile Hello, world or even less with
-safe
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: and...@metalanguage.com
--- Comment #0 from Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com 2009-10-15
17:23:52 PDT ---
This program:
import std.stdio;
void main() {
}
fails to compile if the -safe switch is used with the error:
/home/andrei/code/dmd/druntime/import/core/stdc/signal.d(25): Error: cast from
int to void C function(int) not allowed in safe mode
/home/andrei/code/dmd/druntime/import/core/stdc/signal.d(26): Error: cast from
int to void C function(int) not allowed in safe mode
/home/andrei/code/dmd/druntime/import/core/stdc/signal.d(27): Error: cast from
int to void C function(int) not allowed in safe mode
We must define and implement the Trusted Computing Base model for druntime and
phobos.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3407] New: [tdpl] Compiling with -safe -release must keep all bound checks
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3407
Summary: [tdpl] Compiling with -safe -release must keep all
bound checks
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: and...@metalanguage.com
--- Comment #0 from Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com 2009-10-15
17:30:43 PDT ---
The following program completes successfully when compiled with -safe -release:
void main() {
auto a = new int[2];
auto b = a[3];
}
When the -safe flag is present, all bound checks must be present.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
