[Issue 2977] std.random.unpredictableSeed() should use thread ID somewhere
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2977 David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com 2009-12-01 06:21:29 PST --- Fixed SVN. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3311] std.range.chain shouldn't have opIndexAssign if arguments aren't mutable.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3311 David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com 2009-12-01 06:21:48 PST --- Fixed SVN. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 2802] VariantN.opCmp!(T) fails when T != VariantN
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2802 David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #2 from David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com 2009-12-01 06:21:07 PST --- Fixed SVN. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3427] Chain doesn't work w/ arrays with immutable elements.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3427 David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com 2009-12-01 09:53:31 PST --- This should be fixed along with bug 3311 in SVN. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3553] ICE when a function argument defaults to __LINE__
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3553 --- Comment #4 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2009-12-01 11:17:08 PST --- (In reply to comment #3) Hrm.. what's that entire block of code in the 'if' doing? TOKfile and TOKline are handled down through the layers of expression parsing (primarily in parsePrimaryExp) just fine, from a quick study of the code. That block is dealing with __LINE__ as a default parameter. In that case only, __LINE is the line that the function is instantiated in, rather than the line it appeared in. So the other uses of TOKfile and TOKline are completely different. Might it be better to change the two parts of parsePrimaryExp to create FileInitExp and LineInitExp's rather than StringExp and IntegerExp's respectively? FileInitExp, LineInitExp are only handled when they're a default function parameter. Lots of stuff would need to change if they were used throughout. Basically, the whole thing seems to be a quick hack to get int line = __LINE__ working as a default parameter, which is by far the most important use case. Dealing with the more complicated, obscure cases would be *much* more work. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
