[Issue 2816] Sudden-death static assert is not very useful
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2816 Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||llu...@gmail.com --- Comment #12 from Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com 2009-12-15 07:14:58 PST --- http://www.dsource.org/projects/dmd/changeset/294 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3579] Broken Links to Compiler
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3579 Jesse Phillips jesse.k.phillip...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | --- Comment #2 from Jesse Phillips jesse.k.phillip...@gmail.com 2009-12-15 07:17:58 PST --- Unless there has been a delay in updating the website, this has not been fixed. This is on the standard homepage http://www.digitalmars.com/d/ and in the section below: There are currently four implementations: 1. Digital Mars dmd for Windows, x86 Linux, Mac OSX 10.5, and x86 FreeBSD for D versions 1 and 2. 2. LLVM D Compiler ldc for D version 1. 3. Gnu D compiler gdc for several platforms, including Windows and Mac OS X for D versions 1.030 and 2.014. 4. D.NET compiler alpha for .NET for D version 2. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3580] Update docs s/invariant/immutable/
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3580 Jesse Phillips jesse.k.phillip...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | --- Comment #3 from Jesse Phillips jesse.k.phillip...@gmail.com 2009-12-15 13:05:57 PST --- Found another. Invariant appears on this page a number of times. http://digitalmars.com/d/2.0/const-faq.html -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3579] Broken Links to Compiler
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3579 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #3 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-12-15 13:19:42 PST --- Fixed again. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3580] Update docs s/invariant/immutable/
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3580 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #4 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-12-15 13:23:22 PST --- Fixed again. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3617] New: CTFE: wrong code for if(x) where x is int or smaller
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3617
Summary: CTFE: wrong code for if(x) where x is int or smaller
Product: D
Version: 1.051
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: patch, wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: clugd...@yahoo.com.au
--- Comment #0 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2009-12-15 14:12:33 PST ---
Applies to while(), if(), assert(), etc.
Also happens if you have (say) uint u = 0x8000_; u=1;
-- since this sets the high bit of the value to 1.
TEST CASE:
int foo() {
int u = cast(int)(0x1__L);
while (u) {
if (u) {
assert(u!=0);
}
assert(u!=0);
}
return 2;
}
static assert(foo()==2);
PATCH: expression.c, around line 1575.
Need to convert the value to an appropriate sized integer.
int IntegerExp::isBool(int result)
{
+toInteger();
return result ? value != 0 : value == 0;
}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 869] Cast of a parenthesized expression combined with !is is mistaken for a C style cast and a template specialization
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=869 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #3 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2009-12-15 14:22:17 PST --- This was fixed between 1.030 and 1.036. No spec change is required (precedence is implied in the BNF descriptions). -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3618] New: Can't call constructor on immutable/const struct
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3618
Summary: Can't call constructor on immutable/const struct
Product: D
Version: 2.036
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: tomeks...@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Tomasz Sowiński tomeks...@gmail.com 2009-12-15 16:08:25
PST ---
I have problems when using an explicit constructor with structs. It manifests
itself when creating a stack variable.
immutable struct Strukt {
this(int pole) { this.pole = pole; }
int pole;
}
void main() {
auto nowy = new Strukt(6); // OK
auto s = Strukt(8); // Error: constructor test.Strukt.this (int pole)
is not callable using argument types (int) immutable
}
Same story for const. Side note: If you take off immutable/const, it compiles.
Looks similar to Bug 2610.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3580] Update docs s/invariant/immutable/
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3580 --- Comment #5 from Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com 2009-12-15 16:49:17 PST --- http://www.dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/1386 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3514] opApply should be the first-choice foreach iteration method.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3514 --- Comment #8 from Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com 2009-12-15 16:52:04 PST --- http://www.dsource.org/projects/dmd/changeset/295 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3617] CTFE: wrong code for if(x) where x is int or smaller
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3617 Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||llu...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com 2009-12-15 16:50:30 PST --- http://www.dsource.org/projects/dmd/changeset/296 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
