[Issue 3726] Regression: ICE(mangle.c 81): struct forward reference with static this
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3726 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #4 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-01-21 23:58:24 PST --- Fixed in svn 345. Never appeared in a released version of DMD. Thanks for the bug report! -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3569] DMD Stack Overflow with a struct member function inside a C-style struct initializer
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3569 --- Comment #3 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-01-22 00:09:28 PST --- Svn commit 337 gets rid of the stack overflow, and turns it into a rejects-valid bug. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3282] The overload and override issue of const/immutable member functions
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3282 Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||r.sagita...@gmx.de --- Comment #2 from Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de 2010-01-22 00:37:37 PST --- This kind of works now with changeset 344. But both f() and f() const overload f() in the base class, and the last one wins. I think dmd should either issue an error or add another entry to the vtbl for the non-exact but covariant match. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3674] forward reference error with multiple overloads with same name
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3674 --- Comment #7 from Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de 2010-01-22 00:39:03 PST --- Thanks, it works now. This also fixes issue 3282 which is what happened if you did not use final to produce an error at compile time. See comments there for another quirk. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3728] getOverloads and identifier traits
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3728 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- Comment #5 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2010-01-22 02:37:22 PST --- Changeset 346 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3726] Regression: ICE(mangle.c 81): struct forward reference with static this
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3726 Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||llu...@gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com 2010-01-22 07:33:28 PST --- It looks like beta releases are already paying off ;) -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3732] Not all COM interfaces inherit from IUnknown.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3732 --- Comment #2 from Burton Radons burton-rad...@shaw.ca 2010-01-22 08:25:15 PST --- Nope. I've since found that this is also common to most of the interfaces used in the reflection API for DirectX 10 and 11, which you're not supposed to implement. I think the intent is the same, just the opposite direction - they're trying to serve objects whose lifetimes are completely dependent on the root object. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3716] Regression with multi dimensional array literals
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3716 --- Comment #1 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-01-22 13:39:10 PST --- This also worked in DMD2.035. Haven't checked intermediate versions. The regression was probably introduced in 2.037. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 2928] Swap order of paramaters for std.range's take
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2928 Kyle Foley k-fo...@onu.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k-fo...@onu.edu --- Comment #5 from Kyle Foley k-fo...@onu.edu 2010-01-22 16:58:03 PST --- What is the status on this? I would like to see it it changed to Take!(R) take(R)(R input, size_t n); Take!(Repeat!(T)) replicate(T)(T value, size_t n); -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 2928] Swap order of paramaters for std.range's take
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2928 --- Comment #6 from Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com 2010-01-22 17:16:25 PST --- I'll change that soon. Thanks! -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3734] New: [patch] src/traits.c does not compile with gcc (Ubuntu 4.4.1-4ubuntu8) 4.4.1
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3734 Summary: [patch] src/traits.c does not compile with gcc (Ubuntu 4.4.1-4ubuntu8) 4.4.1 Product: D Version: 2.040 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com ReportedBy: jason.james.ho...@gmail.com --- Comment #0 from Jason House jason.james.ho...@gmail.com 2010-01-22 20:06:10 PST --- It looks parenthesis were accidentally forgotten. This would probably manifest itself as some kind of bug in the future... diff traits.c.bk traits.c 57c57 if (p-ident == Id::getVirtualFunctions !f-isVirtual) --- if (p-ident == Id::getVirtualFunctions !f-isVirtual()) -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3728] getOverloads and identifier traits
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3728 --- Comment #7 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2010-01-22 20:25:36 PST --- Added the (), changeset 347 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3734] [patch] src/traits.c does not compile with gcc (Ubuntu 4.4.1-4ubuntu8) 4.4.1
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3734 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- Comment #1 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2010-01-22 21:23:58 PST --- Changeset 347 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3727] lots of deffering SomeStructName messages when compiling
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3727 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- Comment #1 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2010-01-22 21:25:40 PST --- Debug printf inadvertently left in. Just comment it out. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3724] bug in Expression::arraySyntaxCopy (null pointer dereference on struct-union-struct
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3724 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- Comment #1 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2010-01-22 21:50:46 PST --- Changeset 348 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
