[Issue 3805] std.format writeUpToFormatSpec function has subtle loop index bug, will drop character after a %%
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3805 Andrei Alexandrescu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||and...@metalanguage.com --- Comment #1 from Andrei Alexandrescu 2010-02-15 21:54:21 PST --- Awesome, thank you. It is very subtle indeed. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3807] New: typedef still listed as keyword, but not present anywhere in grammar
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3807 Summary: typedef still listed as keyword, but not present anywhere in grammar Product: D Version: 2.040 Platform: All URL: http://digitalmars.com/d/2.0/lex.html OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: spec Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: www.digitalmars.com AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com ReportedBy: jlqu...@optonline.net --- Comment #0 from Jerry Quinn 2010-02-15 21:50:10 PST --- I believe I saw messages saying that typedef was being eliminated from the language. It is no longer present in the section on declarations. However, it is still present in the list of keywords. It should be removed from keywords as well if it is no longer part of the language. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3806] New: TypeInfo_Const has member base in object_.d and member next in object.di
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3806 Summary: TypeInfo_Const has member base in object_.d and member next in object.di Product: D Version: 2.040 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: druntime AssignedTo: s...@invisibleduck.org ReportedBy: y0uf00...@gmail.com --- Comment #0 from Michael Rynn 2010-02-15 20:52:55 PST --- TypeInfo_Const in object_.d inherits function next(). It has a member, TypeInfo base.This is useful for unwrapping Invariant and Const types. But object.di TypeInfo_Const has no member base but has member next, which would occupy same memory layout as the member base in object.d.Trying to access TypeInfo_Const next, confuses with inherited next, which returns base.next. Would like direct access to the member base please (rename from next in object.di), just like in TypeInfo_Typedef. Workaround is just to fix it, edit object.di, TypeInfo_Const, and change name of member next to base. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3805] New: std.format writeUpToFormatSpec function has subtle loop index bug, will drop character after a %%
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3805
Summary: std.format writeUpToFormatSpec function has subtle
loop index bug, will drop character after a %%
Product: D
Version: 2.040
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Phobos
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: y0uf00...@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Michael Rynn 2010-02-15 20:32:00 PST
---
private void writeUpToFormatSpec(OutRange, S)(ref OutRange w, ref S fmt)
{
for (size_t i = 0; i < fmt.length; ++i)
{
if (fmt[i] != '%') continue;
if (fmt[++i] != '%')
{
// spec found, print and bailout
w.put(fmt[0 .. i - 1]);
fmt = fmt[i .. $];
return;
}
// doubled! Now print whatever we had, then update the string
// and move on
w.put(fmt[0 .. i]);
fmt = fmt[i + 1 .. $];
/// BUG !! unable to ever reset a size_t for loop index value to zero, because
it is always incremented to 1 at start of next iteration. This means next
character after a '%%' will be dropped.
i = 0;
}
/// A better version might look like this.
/// Take the i++ out of the for loop top, move it to the first test case.
for (size_t i = 0; i < fmt.length;)
{
if (fmt[i++] != '%') continue;
if (fmt[i] != '%')
{
// spec found, print and bailout
w.put(fmt[0 .. i - 1]);
fmt = fmt[i .. $];
return;
}
// doubled! Now print whatever we had, then update the string
// and move on
w.put(fmt[0 .. i]);
fmt = fmt[i + 1 .. $];
i = 0; // OK now, will be 0 at the top of the loop
}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3745] Linking error with associative array of arrays
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3745
--- Comment #1 from Alexey Ivanov 2010-02-15 12:50:16 PST
---
If rewrite a.d as:
module a;
class A {
private int[][int] n;
public int[] foo() {
return n.keys;
}
public int[][int] foo() {
return n;
}
}
It compiles fine.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 2451] Adding structs that use opAssign or postblit to an AA is broken
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2451 GG changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ggcod...@gmail.com --- Comment #4 from GG 2010-02-15 12:14:09 PST --- import std.variant; Variant[char[]][int] aa; aa[0]["a"] = "bla0"; aa[0]["b"] = 100; aa[1]["a"] = "bla1"; aa[1]["b"] = 200; With 32-bit Linux and dmd2.039 or dmd2.040 Compile : success Running : core.exception.rangeer...@test(30): Range violation -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3701] Incorrect initialisation of static arrays of floating-point values
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3701 ggcod...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ggcod...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from ggcod...@gmail.com 2010-02-15 12:00:44 PST --- --With 32-bit Linux and dmd 2.040 it prints: 0 0 1.6749e-4932 --With 32-bit Linux and dmd 2.039 it prints: nan nan nan -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3804] New: Recent versions of GNU C Library have execvpe() implemented.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3804 Summary: Recent versions of GNU C Library have execvpe() implemented. Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P2 Component: Phobos AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com ReportedBy: ibuc...@ubuntu.com --- Comment #0 from Iain Buclaw 2010-02-15 03:26:57 PST --- Recent versions of GNU C Library have execvpe() implemented, so std/process.d should be updated to reflex this in POSIX systems by allowing D to use the system's own implementation. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3662] Wrong compile error within struct constructor and C-style initializer
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3662 Don changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lud...@informatik.uni-luebe ||ck.de --- Comment #1 from Don 2010-02-15 02:03:08 PST --- *** Issue 3802 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3802] Error message without line number when using struct initializers for a struct with constructors.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3802 Don changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Don 2010-02-15 02:03:08 PST --- *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 3662 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3701] Incorrect initialisation of static arrays of floating-point values
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3701 --- Comment #2 from Lars T. Kyllingstad 2010-02-15 01:28:56 PST --- Well, I'll be... Now I can't reproduce it either -- not even with DMD 2.039, which was the version I was using when I reported the bug. I swear, I tried this several times before I reported it, both on my regular OS, 64-bit Linux, and in two virtual machines, 32-bit Linux and Windows XP. There was no bug on Windows, which is why I marked the report as Linux-specific. If nobody else can reproduce this it should just be closed. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3803] compiler segfaults
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3803 Don changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au --- Comment #1 from Don 2010-02-15 01:16:22 PST --- This was a regression since 1.053. Suprisingly, it is fixed by bug 3767, in svn 367. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3701] Incorrect initialisation of static arrays of floating-point values
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3701 Don changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au --- Comment #1 from Don 2010-02-15 00:45:45 PST --- Can someone confirm this? The code works correctly on Windows on 2.038 and every other version I've tried. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
