[Issue 3274] dmd fails to emit code for templates into object file if several files are compiled at once
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3274 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2011-04-04 23:17:05 PDT --- The compiler does this as a compile performance optimization. Otherwise, template instantiations have to be done over and over, filling the object files, and then the linker has to remove the duplicates. The workaround for an incremental build system is straightforward - put only one source module on a command to dmd at a time. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
Language Reference
After clicking on Template in the left menu of Language Reference on http://d-programming-language.org/ page, the menu collapses to start menu, while for other items it remains visible.
Language Reference: Usual Arithmetic Conversions
The following section from the Language Reference does not correspond to the current dmd compiler (v2.052, Windows) behaviour: Integer values cannot be implicitly converted to another type that cannot represent the integer bit pattern after integral promotion. For example: ubyte u1 = cast(byte)-1; // error, -1 cannot be represented in a ubyte ushort u2 = cast(short)-1; // error, -1 cannot be represented in a ushort uint u3 = cast(int)-1;// ok, -1 can be represented in a uint ulong u4 = cast(ulong)-1; // ok, -1 can be represented in a ulong Both byte and short casts work all right.
[Issue 2990] TypeInfo.init() returns invalid array
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2990 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- Comment #2 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2011-04-05 11:31:07 PDT --- This is deliberate, see the typinf.c code: // void[] init; dtsize_t(pdt, sd-structsize); // init.length if (sd-zeroInit) dtsize_t(pdt, 0);// NULL for 0 initialization else dtxoff(pdt, sd-toInitializer(), 0, TYnptr);// init.ptr I'll fix the documentation. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
Re: Language Reference: Usual Arithmetic Conversions
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 20:10:19 +0200, Morlan h...@valentimex.com wrote: The following section from the Language Reference does not correspond to the current dmd compiler (v2.052, Windows) behaviour: Integer values cannot be implicitly converted to another type that cannot represent the integer bit pattern after integral promotion. For example: ubyte u1 = cast(byte)-1; // error, -1 cannot be represented in a ubyte ushort u2 = cast(short)-1; // error, -1 cannot be represented in a ushort uint u3 = cast(int)-1;// ok, -1 can be represented in a uint ulong u4 = cast(ulong)-1; // ok, -1 can be represented in a ulong Both byte and short casts work all right. Please use bugzilla to file issues: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/enter_bug.cgi -- Simen
[Issue 2990] TypeInfo.init() returns invalid array
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2990 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #3 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2011-04-05 11:41:20 PDT --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/commit/a771c11bfe357ac2c6c87e96b39e8986286222f5 https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/50a73bef9ac0e6f8bbc713c1ded85a8254175feb -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
Re: Language Reference
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 20:04:43 +0200, Morlan h...@valentimex.com wrote: After clicking on Template in the left menu of Language Reference on http://d-programming-language.org/ page, the menu collapses to start menu, while for other items it remains visible. Please use bugzilla to file issues: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/enter_bug.cgi -- Simen
[Issue 5812] Power expression optimisation: constant fold (x^^0) = 1
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5812 --- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com 2011-04-05 16:00:43 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=937) implement noted foldable code in this report -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5812] Power expression optimisation: constant fold (x^^0) = 1
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5812 Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #937 is|0 |1 obsolete|| --- Comment #3 from Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com 2011-04-05 16:08:49 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=938) just noticed previous patch allows to bypass an error - fixed -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3831] writeln of a delegate typeid
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3831 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com Resolution|DUPLICATE | --- Comment #5 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2011-04-05 20:39:25 PDT --- 3086 doesn't fix it. It could be fixed by having toString() demangle the deco. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3543] : ? operator can't find common type for classes/interfaces
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3543 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- Comment #5 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2011-04-05 21:21:03 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) This also fails if you're doing this with classes (just replace interface with class in the example above). With classes, this should definitely work, but it fails. It works with classes when I try it. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3543] : ? operator can't find common type for classes/interfaces
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3543 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #6 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2011-04-05 21:39:01 PDT --- I'm going to mark this as an enhancement. When the inheritance graph is non-trivial, I don't think it's so obvious which, if any, of the ancestors should be picked. Perhaps the user should decide. So I'm skeptical this is a good idea. Meanwhile, it does work for classes, which make sense because classes are single inheritance. A common root, if there is one, would be only one. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3712] Error message without filename or line numbers on invalid code
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3712 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com Resolution||WORKSFORME --- Comment #2 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2011-04-05 22:06:40 PDT --- dmd 1.068 and 2.053 produce test.d(3): Error: undefined identifier DmdFails test.d(8): Error: template instance test.foo!(int) error instantiating -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4028] delegates with differing default arguments lead to same template instantiation
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4028 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- Comment #6 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2011-04-05 22:15:35 PDT --- (In reply to comment #4) The two delegates *are* the same type, so they are supposed to lead to the same template instantiation. Introducing a default parameter does not create a new type. I'm not sure why function pointers with default parameters are accepted at all. I think it should be an error. I suspect the only way to deal with this is, as you suggest, disallowing default arguments for function pointers. I don't know what the downside of that is, though. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4039] Another possible DWARF issue
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4039 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- Comment #3 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2011-04-05 22:24:35 PDT --- Curiously, neither dwarfdump nor objdump complain about either a.o or b.o individually. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4062] can call method without this pointer inside is()
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4062 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- Comment #1 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2011-04-05 22:48:42 PDT --- It's definitely a bug. Fixing it requires moving the check for the error from e2ir.c to semantic(). -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
