[Issue 8549] Bad error message with const methods
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8549 --- Comment #3 from Andrej Mitrovic 2012-10-19 21:40:56 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Issue6707 covers this, the error message is now: > > I agree with closing this as dupe. > > But I think adding "const" at the end is not nearly enough to make the error > message clear. I would take a bigger pull to fix this since there's a lot of code duplication in DMD. Personally I would change the message to: Error: function test.Foo.opSlice () is not callable using const(this) What do you think? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8549] Bad error message with const methods
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8549 --- Comment #4 from Andrej Mitrovic 2012-10-19 21:41:21 PDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > I would take *It* would take. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8549] Bad error message with const methods
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8549 --- Comment #2 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-10-19 21:36:07 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Issue6707 covers this, the error message is now: I agree with closing this as dupe. But I think adding "const" at the end is not nearly enough to make the error message clear. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6707] Error message for mismatch of const/non-const property functions needs to improve
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6707 Andrej Mitrovic changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc --- Comment #3 from Andrej Mitrovic 2012-10-19 20:57:42 PDT --- *** Issue 8549 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8549] Bad error message with const methods
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8549 Andrej Mitrovic changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic 2012-10-19 20:57:41 PDT --- Issue6707 covers this, the error message is now: test.d(11): Error: function test.Foo.opSlice () is not callable using argument types () const *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 6707 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8856] import inside function sometimes causes link errors
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8856
--- Comment #4 from Andrej Mitrovic 2012-10-19
20:34:14 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> snip
The problem is DMD's -v option doesn't output dependencies when an import is
function local.
test.d:
module test;
import foo;
void main() { }
foo.d:
module foo;
import bar;
bar.d is empty
$ dmd -c -v test.d
> importfoo (foo.d)
> importbar (bar.d)
Now use a local import in foo.d:
foo.d:
module foo;
void loc() { import bar; }
$ dmd -c -v test.d
> importfoo (foo.d)
DMD doesn't output the import to bar.d when using -v. That has to be fixed.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8856] import inside function sometimes causes link errors
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8856 --- Comment #3 from thelastmamm...@gmail.com 2012-10-19 20:20:57 PDT --- In the above post, DFLAGS is just the usual import path to dmdroot/phobos, druntime/import and phobos library path. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8856] import inside function sometimes causes link errors
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8856
--- Comment #2 from thelastmamm...@gmail.com 2012-10-19 20:18:49 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> We'll need a failing test-case. What contents cause the linker error?
here's a failure case which I simplified to the maximum.
Note that link error occurs with rdmd, not with dmd, as shown below. So that is
a problem with rdmd failing to find dependencies in some cases.
rdmd ${DFLAGS} main
=>Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
"_D9main_aux24fun1FZv", referenced from:
_D8main_aux4testFZv in main.o
ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
dmd ${DFLAGS} main main_aux main_aux2
=> works
Here are the files:
.
├── main.d
├── main_aux.d
└── main_aux2.d
cat main.d
import main_aux;
void main(){
test;
}
cat main_aux.d
module main_aux;
//putting the main function here removes link error
//void main(){
//test;
//}
//import main_aux2; //uncomment removes link error
void test(){
import main_aux2;
fun1();
}
cat main_aux2.d
module main_aux2;
void fun1() {
}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8856] import inside function sometimes causes link errors
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8856 Andrej Mitrovic changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic 2012-10-19 18:44:09 PDT --- We'll need a failing test-case. What contents cause the linker error? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8856] New: import inside function sometimes causes link errors
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8856
Summary: import inside function sometimes causes link errors
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: thelastmamm...@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from thelastmamm...@gmail.com 2012-10-19 18:18:13 PDT ---
I sometimes get link errors eg:
void fun(){
import mypackage.mymodule;
mypackage.mymodule.myfun(); //might cause link error, depending on contents
of myfun
}
(cf http://forum.dlang.org/thread/xdonaxnahmonhyafh...@forum.dlang.org)
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4542] [tdpl] TDPL NVI example results in linker error
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4542 --- Comment #13 from Andrej Mitrovic 2012-10-19 15:35:23 PDT --- What should have been done from day #1 is to implement the 'virtual' keyword and make methods non-virtual by default. It goes hand in hand with 'override'. I really don't know why virtual is on by default, maybe someone thought polymorphism would be used a lot in D but it turns out templates are much cooler to work with these days rather than OOP, just look at Phobos for example. (ok the last part is highly subjective :) ) (In reply to comment #12) > at the cost of performance in pretty much all programs. I wonder what would happen to performance if we suddenly switched behavior and made methods non-virtual by default (and require a 'virtual' keyword). Of course you'd have to fix your code and add 'virtual' to base methods, but this is practically an error-free refactoring since 'override' was already required. You would get CT errors rather than weird runtime behavior (like C++03). -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8850] Nested struct creation by a template
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8850
timon.g...@gmx.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||timon.g...@gmx.ch
--- Comment #3 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-10-19 15:30:32 PDT ---
I think it is supposed to work, the following does work:
T fun(T, alias f)(){
T s;
return s;
}
void main() {
int x=2;
void f(){}
struct R { int f() { return x; } }
auto m = fun!(R,f)();
}
(The reason why it works is that the alias function parameter forces local
template instantiation.)
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6894] ICE(cod1.c) with immutable and static
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6894
--- Comment #2 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-10-19 14:02:41 PDT ---
With dmd 2.061alpha it gives:
Internal error: backend\cod1.c 1718
- - - - - - - - -
Maybe related:
bool foo(int[3] data) {
return true;
}
struct Bar(T...) if (foo(T[0])) {}
void main() {
immutable int[3] array = [1, 2, 3];
Bar!array b;
}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8850] Nested struct creation by a template
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8850
monarchdo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||monarchdo...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2012-10-19 13:14:58 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> I'm not sure the intended behavior but currently is inconsistent. The
> following
> code fails to compile with:
>
> bad.d(2): Error: function D main is a nested function and cannot be accessed
> from bad.fun!(R).fun
>
> T fun(T)() if(is(T == struct)) {
> T s;
> return s;
> }
>
> void main() {
> struct R {
> void f() { }
> }
>
> auto m = fun!R();
> }
>
> However removing the function from the struct definition (include other values
> if desired) then it will compile. I'd think we'd want templates to have the
> ability to create a nested struct.
Nested structs keep a frame pointer (or something alike) to be able to access
anything inside main, from outside of main. As such, you can't use them (as is)
as a template parameter.
HOWEVER, you can declare your struct as "static" explicitly stating that the
struct does not keep any extra info, at which point it becomes useable:
T fun(T)() if(is(T == struct)) {
T s;
return s;
}
void main() {
static struct R {
void f() { }
}
auto m = fun!R();
}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8855] New: cannot define a function name that matches a package name in import statements
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8855
Summary: cannot define a function name that matches a package
name in import statements
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: thelastmamm...@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from thelastmamm...@gmail.com 2012-10-19 11:47:54 PDT ---
When I define a function name (eg test() ) that matches a package name in
import statements (eg test.fun), I get a CT error: function main.test conflicts
with import main.test at main.d(1).
Not only is the CT error misleading, causing headaches in larger projects, but
also, is that an intended restriction?
suppose the following files:
├── main.d
└── test
└── fun.d
cat main.d:
import test.fun;
void test(){} //CT error: function main.test conflicts with import main.test at
main.d(1)
void main(){}
cat test/fun.d:
module test.fun;
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8799] Give example of Tuple mapped to a function
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8799 --- Comment #1 from Jesse Phillips 2012-10-19 11:28:57 PDT --- Sorry I miss understood and did not remember that Tuples do auto expand. The actual request is mapping the Tuple to a function, as requested on SO: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12888263/mapping-variadic-template-arguments-in-d -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8850] Nested struct creation by a template
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8850 Jesse Phillips changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jesse.k.phillip...@gmail.co ||m --- Comment #1 from Jesse Phillips 2012-10-19 11:24:26 PDT --- May be duplicating or related to: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8542 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8854] New: incomprehensible bug on windows with import side effect
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8854
Summary: incomprehensible bug on windows with import side
effect
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: thelastmamm...@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from thelastmamm...@gmail.com 2012-10-19 11:24:45 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=1150)
zip containing all 4 files to reproduce bug
I've attached a set of 4 files I've simplified as much as I could. This gives
rise to a very weird bug (only on windows 32 bits). Here's the contents of the
readme:
steps to reproduce bug:
cd to directory containing this readme
rdmd --force -I.\tests main
note:
dmd -I.\tests main main_aux1 tests/main_testfun and then running main still has
the bug
note:
any of the following changes will remove the bug (ie the assert will pass):
rename tests/main_testfun to tests/main_aux2 (or probably other stuff) and
reflecting this in main_testfun.d and the import statement in main.d)
rename directory tests to test123 (or something else) and reflecting this in
the -I flag
remove the (useless) import main_aux1; in main_testfun.d
remove the (useless) import std.stdio in main_aux1.d
replace assert([0].map!(a=>b.length)[0]==1); by assert(b.length==1); in
main_testfun.d
├── main.d
├── main_aux1.d
├── readme.txt
└── tests
└── main_testfun.d
contents of each file:
cat main.d
import main_testfun;
void main(){
testfun;
}
cat main_aux1.d
module main_aux1;
import std.stdio;//works wo this
cat tests/main_testfun.d
module main_testfun;
import main_aux1;
import std.algorithm:map;
void testfun(){
auto b=[1];
assert([0].map!(a=>b.length)[0]==1);
}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8542] crosstalk between template instantiations
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8542 Jesse Phillips changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jesse.k.phillip...@gmail.co ||m --- Comment #5 from Jesse Phillips 2012-10-19 11:23:02 PDT --- I may have duplicated this issue: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8850 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8853] New: Unable to use std.concurrency.receive with Tuple!(immutable(int[]))
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8853
Summary: Unable to use std.concurrency.receive with
Tuple!(immutable(int[]))
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Phobos
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: lomerei...@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Artem Tarasov 2012-10-19 11:01:09
PDT ---
The following code compiles, but the program hangs (because the message is not
received by foo()). Without wrapping array into struct everything works. If
immutable(int[]) is changed to immutable(int)[] -- also works.
import std.concurrency;
struct A {
immutable(int[]) a;
}
void foo(Tid tid) {
receive(
(A a) {
send(tid, true);
});
}
void main() {
Tid tid = spawn(&foo, thisTid);
immutable(int[]) a = [1];
send(tid, A(a));
receiveOnly!bool();
}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8836] function called with argument types ((void function())) matches both f(void function() fn) and f(void delegate() dg)
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8836 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #2 from Kenji Hara 2012-10-19 08:22:49 PDT --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1193 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8836] function called with argument types ((void function())) matches both f(void function() fn) and f(void delegate() dg)
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8836
Kenji Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
--- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara 2012-10-19 06:49:29 PDT ---
Reduced test case:
int f(void function () fn) { return 1; }
int f(void delegate () dg) { return 2; }
void foo() {} // unsafe, impure, and may throw
void main()
{
f({ foo(); });
}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8257] __traits(compiles) gives compile error
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8257
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au
--- Comment #1 from Don 2012-10-19 04:14:25 PDT ---
The error is not coming from __traits(compiles), it happens while generating
the obj file.
If you compile with dmd -c -o-
then no error occurs.
The error message itself should I think be regarded as an internal compiler
error.
Here's the root cause.
struct S { static void g() { } static int w;}
void main()
{
S s;
auto k = &s.g;
pragma(msg, typeof(&s.g));
}
This compiles with -c -o-
According to the pragma, &s.g is a delegate. But, since g is a static function,
it cannot be a valid delegate. The error is detected only at the glue layer.
I believe that &s.g should be a function pointer, and s should be ignored,
since already:
int *x = &s.w; // accepted, s is ignored
s.g(); // accepted, s is ignored.
This would mean the __traits in the original code would continue to return
true, but the function f!"g"() would actually be valid and would return a
function pointer, not a delegate.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8851] std.string.join should allow 'char' as joiner
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8851 monarchdo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@puremagic.com|monarchdo...@gmail.com --- Comment #4 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2012-10-19 02:45:07 PDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #1) > > I expect that this stems from the stupidity of character literals > > defaulting to > > char rather than dchar, and when you couple that with the fact that > > templates > > always use the _exact_ type of what you give them, it's going to try and > > instantiate join with a separator of char, which doesn't work with ranges of > > dchar. I'm not sure how you'd go about fixing that. > > I investigated, and that's not it. > > It's *just* that std.array.join, like std.algorithm.joiner, expects the > separator to be a range. > > The enhancement request here would be for both "std.array.join" > std.algorithm.joiner" to accept a single element as a separator. > > In the meantime, of course, a simple workaround is to just "join([sep])". > > I think this needlessly allocates a 1 element array though, no? > > > On a side note, the current restrictions in join are overly restrictive, > requiring an *exact* ElementType match, making this illegal: > >int[] sep = [1]; >double[] z = [[0.1], [0.2]].join(sep); > > The implementation actually perfectly supports it. As a matter of fact, joiner > supports it. I'll see into relaxing the restraints for now, and taking the > opportunity to investigate using an element as a separator. That was fast actually. Both the fix and the enhancement are trivially trivial. I believe in the change, so I'm assigning to self. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8848] Array literals and AA literals are rejected as template value parameters
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8848
--- Comment #2 from Don 2012-10-19 02:40:26 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > The template spec says that they are valid (both D1 and D2),
>
> So are associative arrays accepted, but simple arrays aren't?
>
> template Foo(int[] X) {}
> template Bar(int[5] X) {}
> void main() {}
No, the current DMD accepts neither arrays or AAs in declarations. But both can
be passed in template tuple parameters.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8851] std.string.join should allow 'char' as joiner
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8851 --- Comment #3 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2012-10-19 02:39:28 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > I expect that this stems from the stupidity of character literals defaulting > to > char rather than dchar, and when you couple that with the fact that templates > always use the _exact_ type of what you give them, it's going to try and > instantiate join with a separator of char, which doesn't work with ranges of > dchar. I'm not sure how you'd go about fixing that. I investigated, and that's not it. It's *just* that std.array.join, like std.algorithm.joiner, expects the separator to be a range. The enhancement request here would be for both "std.array.join" std.algorithm.joiner" to accept a single element as a separator. In the meantime, of course, a simple workaround is to just "join([sep])". I think this needlessly allocates a 1 element array though, no? On a side note, the current restrictions in join are overly restrictive, requiring an *exact* ElementType match, making this illegal: int[] sep = [1]; double[] z = [[0.1], [0.2]].join(sep); The implementation actually perfectly supports it. As a matter of fact, joiner supports it. I'll see into relaxing the restraints for now, and taking the opportunity to investigate using an element as a separator. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8851] std.string.join should allow 'char' as joiner
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8851 monarchdo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||monarchdo...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2012-10-19 02:36:28 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > I expect that this stems from the stupidity of character literals defaulting > to > char rather than dchar, and when you couple that with the fact that templates > always use the _exact_ type of what you give them, it's going to try and > instantiate join with a separator of char, which doesn't work with ranges of > dchar. I'm not sure how you'd go about fixing that. I investigated, and that's not it. It's *just* that std.array.join, like std.algorithm.joiner, expects the separator to be a range. The enhancement request here would be for both "std.array.join" std.algorithm.joiner" to accept a single element as a separator. In the meantime, of course, a simple workaround is to just "join([sep])". I think this needlessly allocates a 1 element array though, no? On a side note, the current restrictions in join are overly restrictive, requiring an exact match, making this illegal: int[] sep = [1]; double[] z = [[0.1], [0.2]].join(sep); When it is perfectly supported: joiner supports it. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8774] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: Unable to join thread
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8774
--- Comment #8 from luka8088 2012-10-19 00:33:58 PDT ---
Here is a simple test case:
-
module program;
import std.stdio;
import core.thread;
void main () {
Thread t1, t2;
t1 = new Thread(delegate { t2.start(); });
t2 = new Thread(delegate { Thread.sleep(dur!"seconds"(1)); });
t1.start();
t2.join();
}
-
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/0d24dd06
output:
core.thread.ThreadException@src/core/thread.d(780): Unable to join thread
if t2.join occurs after t2 already finished then exception is not thrown, hence
the sleep
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8774] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: Unable to join thread
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8774 luka8088 changed: What|Removed |Added CC||luka8...@owave.net --- Comment #7 from luka8088 2012-10-19 00:32:12 PDT --- *** Issue 8852 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6116] May not join spawn()'ed threads
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6116 Alex R�nne Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC||a...@lycus.org Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #5 from Alex R�nne Petersen 2012-10-19 09:31:01 CEST --- Closing this then. Please reopen if the bug resurfaces. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8852] Unable to join thread (started by another thread)
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8852 luka8088 changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from luka8088 2012-10-19 00:32:12 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Possibly related to #8774. Yes, thank you for the note *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 8774 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8852] New: Unable to join thread (started by another thread)
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8852
Summary: Unable to join thread (started by another thread)
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Phobos
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: luka8...@owave.net
--- Comment #0 from luka8088 2012-10-19 00:28:36 PDT ---
module program;
import std.stdio;
import core.thread;
void main () {
Thread t1, t2;
t1 = new Thread(delegate { t2.start(); });
t2 = new Thread(delegate { Thread.sleep(dur!"seconds"(1)); });
t1.start();
t2.join();
}
-
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/0d24dd06
output:
core.thread.ThreadException@src/core/thread.d(780): Unable to join thread
if t2.join occurs after t2 already finished then exception is not thrown, hence
the sleep
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8852] Unable to join thread (started by another thread)
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8852 Alex R�nne Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a...@lycus.org --- Comment #1 from Alex R�nne Petersen 2012-10-19 09:29:58 CEST --- Possibly related to #8774. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
